Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:29:35.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) Cultivars to Multiple Plant Growth Regulator Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Belly J. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Univ. Ga., Ga. Stn., Griffin, GA 30223–1797

Abstract

Plant growth regulators were evaluated on common and African ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass. Flurprimidol plus mefluidide applied at 1.1 plus 0.14 kg ha-1 and followed by 0.56 plus 0.14 kg ha-1 at 2- to 3-week interval suppressed vegetative growth of mowed common bermudagrass for 5 wk (17 to 23%) and unmowed turf for 6 wk (40%), but severely injured the turf. The injury ranged from 25 to 32% from 2 to 6 wk after treatment. The plant growth regulators that injured common bermudagrass less than flurprimidol plus mefluidide did not suppress the mowed turf for as long a period. Vegetative growth of common bermudagrass not mowed was suppressed for 6 wk when treated once with flurprimidol plus mefluidide and twice with flurprimidol, mefluidide, imazethapyr, paclobutrazol (1.1 plus 1.1 kg ha-1), and paclobutrazol plus mefluidide. Of the plant growth regulators evaluated, only imazethapyr suppressed common bermudagrass seedheads. The suppression was 70% for 4 wk, but reduced to <70% by 5 wk. Paclobutrazol applied initially at 1.1 kg ha-1 and followed at 0.56 kg ha-1 suppressed vegetative growth of mowed Tifway bermudagrass for 5 wk and unmowed turf for 8 wk without causing severe injury. The suppression of mowed Tifway bermudagrass with two applications of paclobutrazol was as good or better than with any other plant growth regulator. All plant growth regulators suppressed vegetative growth of unmowed Tifway bermudagrass for 8 wk.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Batten, S. M. 1983. Growth regulators–new tools for the ‘80s? USGA Green Section 21(3):13.Google Scholar
2. DiPaola, J. M., Gilbert, W. B., and Lewis, W. M. 1985. Turfgrass response to growth retardants. Fact Sheet, Fla. Turf Digest 2(1).Google Scholar
3. Hield, H., Hemstreet, S., Gibeault, V. A., and Younger, V. B. 1979. Warm-season turf growth control with Embark. Calif. Agric. 33(10): 1516.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, B. J. 1989. Response of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) to plant growth regulators. Weed Technol. 3:440444.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, B. J. 1988. Influence of nitrogen on the response of Tifway' bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) to flurprimidol. Weed Technol. 2:5358.Google Scholar
6. SAS Institute. 1982. SAS User's Guide, SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
7. Wu, Chu-huange, Meyers, H. R., and Santelmann, P. W. 1976. Chemical retardation of bermudagrass turf. Agron. J. 68:949952.Google Scholar