Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:08:07.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Sulfonylurea-Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max) and Selected Weed Species to Imazethapyr and Thifensulfuron Combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. M. Simpson  and
E. W. Stoller
D. M. Simpson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Univ. of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
E. W. Stoller
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Agronomy Dep., Univ. of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean (STS soybean) tolerance to imazethapyr (70 g/ha) plus thifensulfuron (4.4 g/ha) tank mixture was evaluated in 1993 and 1994 at two locations in Illinois. Thifensulfuron injury was reduced from 27% in non-STS soybean to 1% in STS soybean 14 days after treatment (DAT). STS and non-STS soybean did not differ in response to imazethapyr alone with < 6% injury 14 DAT. Injury from the tank mix was reduced from 40% in non-STS soybean to 24% in STS soybean 14 DAT. However, a synergistic interaction between the herbicides exists in STS soybean. The yield of injured soybean was not reduced in either STS or non-STS soybean. Injury to STS soybean from the tank mix was decreased by reducing the rate of imazethapyr from 70 g/ha to 52.5 or 35 g/ha. Reducing the thifensulfuron rate mixed with imazethapyr at 70 g/ha did not decrease injury in STS soybean. Control of smooth pigweed, common lambsquarters, and common cocklebur was not affected by reducing the rate of either herbicide in the tank mixture.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcommon cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. # XANSTcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACHsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Interactionssynergismtank mixturesSTS soybean
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 582 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. 1990. Enhancement of soybean (Glycine max) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron-insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4:524–528.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, D., McGlamery, M., Knake, E., Pike, D., and Hager, A. 1994. Weed control for corn, soybeans, and sorghum. p. 65–101 in Steffey, K., ed. Illinois Agricultural Pest Control Handbook. Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1994. Agric. Chem. Usage 1993 Field Crops Summary. U.S. Dep. Agric., Natl. Agric. Statistics Serv., Washington, D.C. p. 61–80.Google Scholar
4. Beckett, T. H. and Stoller, E. W. 1991. Effects of methylammonium and urea ammonium nitrate on foliar uptake of thifensulfuron in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 39:333–338.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
6. Fielding, R. J. and Stoller, E. W. 1990. Effects of additives on the efficacy, uptake, and translocation of the methyl ester of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:172–178.Google Scholar
7. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York. p. 108–116.Google Scholar
8. Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Bruff, S. A. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control with AC263,222. Weed Technol. 7:331–336.Google Scholar
9. Griffin, J. L. and Habett, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:459–462.Google Scholar
10. Hahn, K. L. and Hughes, M. R. 1993. Weed control options for “STS” soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:80.Google Scholar
11. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
12. Kent, L. M., Wills, G. D., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effect of ammonium sulfate, imazapyr, and environment on the phytotoxicity of imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:202–205.Google Scholar
13. Maxwell, D. J., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., McGlamery, M. D., and Stoller, E. W. 1993. Annu. Weed Control Res. Rep. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. p. 86–190.Google Scholar
14. Newsome, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) response to chlorimuron and imazethapyr as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Technol. 6:389–395.Google Scholar
15. Sebastian, S. A., Fader, G. M., Ulrich, J. F., Forney, D. R., and Chaleff, R. S. 1989. Semidominant soybean mutation for resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Crop Sci. 29:1403–1408.Google Scholar
16. Wilms, W. C. and Chicoine, T. K. 1992. Update on thifensulfuron treatments for postemergence use in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:117.Google Scholar
17. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effect of adjuvants on weed control and soybean (Glycine max) tolerance with AC263,222. Weed Technol. 5:817–822.Google Scholar
18. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean. Weed Technol. 5:434–438.Google Scholar