Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:37:40.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Effects on Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum Ptycanthum) and Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adrienne M. Rich
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Karen A. Renner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: renner@msu.edu

Abstract

Reducing seeding rates in 19- or 76-cm row soybean below the optimum rate may reduce soybean competitiveness with weeds, and indirectly increase production costs to the grower. Field studies in 2001 and 2002 evaluated the effect of soybean seeding rate and row spacing on the emergence, growth, and competitiveness of eastern black nightshade (EBN) in soybean. EBN emergence ceased within 45 d after planting (DAP), and was similar across soybean seeding rates and row spacing. EBN control by glyphosate was not affected by soybean population or row spacing. Soybean planted in 19-cm rows was more competitive with EBN, regardless of seeding rate. Increasing the soybean seeding rate in 76-cm rows from 185,000 seeds/ha to 432,000 seeds/ha reduced EBN dry weight threefold at East Lansing and nearly twofold at Clarksville in 2002. There was no increase in EBN density or dry weight in 19-cm row soybean planted at 308,000 seeds/ha compared with 556,000 seeds/ha, whereas a seeding rate of 432,000 seeds/ha in 76-cm row soybean did not suppress EBN dry weight or increase soybean yield in the presence of EBN compared with a seeding rate of 308,000 seeds/ha.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:394398.Google Scholar
Bertram, M. G. and Pedersen, P. 2004. Adjusting management practices using glyphosate-resistance soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 96:462468.Google Scholar
Crotser, M. P. and Witt, W. W. 2000. Effect of Glycine max canopy characteristics, G. max interference and weed-free period on Solanum ptycanthum growth. Weed Sci. 48:2026.Google Scholar
Dalley, C. D., Kells, J. J., and Renner, K. A. 2004a. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on weed growth in corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 18:177182.Google Scholar
Dalley, C. D., Kells, J. J., and Renner, K. A. 2004b. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) yield. Weed Technol. 18:165176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Fjell, D. L., Shroyer, J. P., Gordon, W. B., Marsh, B. H., Maddux, L. D., Martin, V. L., and Duncan, S. R. 1995. Row spacing and seeding rates for soybean in low and high yielding environments. J. Prod. Agric. 8:215222.Google Scholar
Harper, JohnL. 1977. Influence of density on yield and mortality. in Harper, J.L., ed. Population Biology of Plants. San Diego, CA Academic. 151194.Google Scholar
Jachetta, J. J., VanHeertum, J. C., and Gerwick, B. C. 1995. Cloransulam-methyl: a new herbicide for soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:8.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003. Row spacing influences the critical timing for weed removal in soybean. Weed Technol. 17:666673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochvil, R. J., Pearce, J. T., and Harrison, M. R. 2004. Row-spacing and seeding rate effects on glyphosate-resistant soybean for mid-Atlantic production systems. Agron. J. 96:10291038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 2001. Influence of weed competition and herbicides on glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:530534.Google Scholar
Lee, T. K. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1983. Some preliminary studies on the biology and control of black nightshade. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:441.Google Scholar
Légère, A. and Shreiber, M. M. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 37:8492.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Renner, K. A. 1997. Weed control using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in narrow- and wide-row soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 10:431437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Boerboom, C. M. 2000. Critical time of weed removal in glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:3542.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 1999. Cost-effective weed management in wide-and narrow-row glyphosate resistance soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 12:460465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Frederick, J. R. 2002. Reduced seeding rate for glyphosate-resistant, drilled soybean on the southeastern coastal plain. Agron. J. 94:12821288.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2001. Effect of seeding rate of drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) on seed yield and gross profit margin. Weed Technol. 15:284292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr and Dawson, J. A. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327335.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:2558.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. G., Walker, R. A., Colvin, D. L., Wehtje, G., and McGuire, J. A. 1988. Comparison of soybean (Glycine max)–weed interference from large and small plots. Weed Sci. 36:836839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984a. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 32:638645.Google Scholar
Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984b. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32:529533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, S. J., Hanway, J. J., Thompson, H. E., and Benson, G. O. 1997. How a Soybean Plant Develops. Ames, IA Iowa State University of Science and Technology Cooperative Extension Service. Special Report 53. 20.Google Scholar
Shibles, R. M. and Weber, C. R. 1965. Leaf area, solar radiation, interception, and dry matter production by soybeans. Crop Sci. 5:575578.Google Scholar
Shibles, R. M. and Weber, C. R. 1966. Interception of solar radiation and dry matter production by various soybean planting patterns. Crop Sci. 6:5559.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989a. Response of soybean (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570574.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989b. Effects of shading and soybean interference on eastern black nightshade growth and development. Weed Res. 29:307316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. M. 1980. Soybean growth and yield as affected by row spacing and by seasonal water supply. Agron. J. 72:543547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. M., Mason, W. K., Bennie, A. T. P., and Rowse, H. R. 1982. Response of soybean to two row spacings and two soil water levels. I. An analysis of biomass accumulation, canopy development, solar radiation interception, and components of seed yield. Field Crops Res. 5:114.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. E. and Witt, W. W. 1987. Germination of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata), smooth groundcherry (Physalis virginianca) and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 35:5862.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Young, J. M., Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., Wax, L. M., and Kapusta, G. 2001. Weed management in narrow- and wide-row glyphosate resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:112121.Google Scholar