Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:39:32.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening Procedure for Soils and Pesticides for Potential Water Quality Impacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Don W. Goss*
Affiliation:
National Water Quality Technology Development Staff, USDA Soil Conserv. Serv., P.O. Box 6567, Fort Worth, TX 76115

Abstract

A screening procedure has been developed to evaluate the relative loss of pesticides from soils, to assist the Soil Conservation Service in implementing water quality for conservation planning. This screening procedure is a first-tier evaluation of the impact of using a particular pesticide on a specified soil. The screening procedure was developed from evaluating pesticide loss from over 40 thousand runs of the GLEAMS (Groundwater Loading Efects of Agricultural Management Systems) model. The model input data were a combination of soils and pesticides with a wide range of properties. The estimated pesticide losses were categorized into losses by leaching, losses adsorbed on sediment in runoff, and losses in the solution phase of runoff. Algorithms using soil properties were developed to rate soils into four loss potential classes for leaching and three loss potential classes for the two categories of runoff. Also, algorithms using pesticide properties were developed to rate pesticides into four loss potential classes for leaching and three loss potential classes for runoff. The soil and pesticide groupings are combined in a matrix to give an overall loss potential rating. Statistics of the overall loss potential indicate the low loss potential class is pure, that is, it does not contain occurrences that have medium or high losses. The medium loss potential classes does not contain occurrences of high loss, but does contain many occurrences of low loss. The high loss potential class contains incidences of medium and low loss.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Goss, D. W. and Wauchope, R. D. 1990. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database: II. Using it with soils data in a screening procedure. p. 471493 in Weigmann, D. L., ed. Pesticides in the Next Decade: The Challenges Ahead. Virginia Water Resources Research Center, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
2. Gustafson, D. I. 1989. Groundwater ubiquity score: a simple method for assessing pesticide teachability. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8:339357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Leonard, R. A., Knisel, W. G., and Still, D. A. 1987. GLEAMS: Ground Water Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 30:14031418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Musgrave, G. W. 1955. How much of the rain enters the soil? p. 151159 in Water, Yearbook of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
5. Wauchope, R. D., Buttler, T. M., Hornsby, A. G., Augustijn-Beckers, P.W.M., and Burt, J. P. 1992. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database for environmental decision-making. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 123:1164.Google ScholarPubMed