Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:55:43.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal Variations in Jack Pine (Pinus banksiana) and White Spruce (Picea glauca) Tolerance to Glyphosate and Triclopyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. G. Willis ,
G. R. Stephenson ,
R. A. Fletcher  and
R. Prasad
R. G. Willis
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
G. R. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
R. A. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
R. Prasad
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Serv., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seasonal variations in tolerance of jack pine and white spruce to glyphosate and triclopyr were investigated in field and growthroom studies. Foliar injury was higher in both species following field applications of herbicides in July during periods of active growth than in September and October when the plants were not growing actively. Herbicides applied to trees in the growthroom 3 weeks after bud break caused greater injury than applications either before or 14 weeks after bud break. White spruce tolerated both glyphosate and triclopyr better than jack pine. Triclopyr injured both species more than glyphosate. Chemical analysis and electron micrographs showed that the cuticular wax deposition on both species was greater in field-grown trees than in growthroom-grown trees and was greater at 14 weeks after bud break than at 3 weeks. Increased wax deposition with time after bud break may reduce herbicide uptake and may account partially for the increased tolerance of both species to glyphosate and triclopyr.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine; triclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acidjack pine, Pinus banksiana L.white spruce, Picea glauca (Moench) VossElectron microscopycuticular wax
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 33 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barring, U. 1979. Results of country wide trials in forestry trials into aerial application of glyphosate and triclopyr amine. Proc. 20th Swed. Weed Control Conf.:82–93.Google Scholar
2. Campbell, R. 1972. Electron microscopy of the epidermis and cuticle of the needles of Pinus nigra in relation to infection by Lophodermella sulcigena . Ann. Bot. 36:307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gratkowski, H. J. 1977. Seasonal effects of phenoxy herbicides on ponderosa pine and associated brush species. For. Sci. 23:3–12.Google Scholar
4. Kolattukudy, P. E. 1965. Biosynthesis of wax in Brassica oleracea . Biochemistry 4:1844–1845.Google Scholar
5. Lehela, A., Day, R. J., and Koran, Z. 1972. A close up of the stomatal regions of white spruce and jack pine. For. Chron. 48:32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lund-Hoie, K. 1975. N-phosphonomethylglycine (glyphosate) an alternative to commercial pre- and post-emergence herbicides for the control of unwanted plant species in forest plantations in Norway. Sci. Rep. Agric. Univ. Norway 54:1–14.Google Scholar
7. Lund-Hoie, K. 1976. The correlation between the tolerance of Norway spruce (Picea abies) to glyphosate (N-phosphonomethylglycine), and the uptake, distribution and metabolism of the herbicide in the spruce plants. Sci. Rep. Agric. Univ. Norway 55:1–26.Google Scholar
8. Lund-Hoie, K. 1984. Growth responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies) to different vegetation managements programmes – preliminary results. Aspects Appl. Biol. 5:127–133.Google Scholar
9. Lund-Hoie, K. 1985. Efficacy of glyphosate in forest plantations. p. 328–338 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworth & Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
10. McCavish, W. J. 1980. Herbicides for woody weedy control by foliar application. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, p. 729–737.Google Scholar
11. Paley, S. M., and Radosevich, S. R. 1984. Effect of physiological status and growth of Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and greenleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos patula) on herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 32:395–402.Google Scholar
12. Radosevich, S. R., Roncoroni, E. J., Conrad, S. G., and McHenry, W. B. 1980. Seasonal tolerance of six coniferous species to eight foliage-active herbicides. For. Sci. 26:3–9.Google Scholar
13. Sutton, R. F. 1978. Glyphosate herbicide: An assessment of forestry potential. For. Chron. 54:24–28.Google Scholar