Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:58:29.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulated controlled-release mesotrione for turfgrass tolerance and weed control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2021

Matthew J.R. Goddard ,
Clebson G. Gonçalves Open the ORCID record for Clebson G. Gonçalves [Opens in a new window]  and
Shawn D. Askew Open the ORCID record for Shawn D. Askew [Opens in a new window]
Matthew J.R. Goddard
Affiliation:
Technology Development Manager, Bayer U.S.–Crop Science, Creve CoeurMO, USA
Clebson G. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Shawn D. Askew*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Shawn D. Askew, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 675 Old Glade Road, Virginia Tech Box 0330, Blacksburg, VA24061. Email: saskew@vt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mesotrione typically requires multiple applications to control emerged weeds in turfgrass. As it is absorbed by both foliage and roots, a controlled-release (CR) formulation could eliminate the need for multiple applications. Research was conducted to evaluate simulated-release scenarios that mimic a potential CR mesotrione formulation. A soluble-concentrate formulation of mesotrione was titrated to produce a stepwise change in mesotrione rates, which were applied daily to mimic predetermined release scenarios over a 3-wk period. CR scenarios were compared to a broadcast treatment of mesotrione at 280 g ai ha–1 applied twice at 3-wk intervals, and a nontreated. Mesotrione applied in three temporal-release scenarios controlled creeping bentgrass, goosegrass, nimblewill, smooth crabgrass, and white clover equivalent to the standard sprayed mesotrione treatment in every comparison. However, each CR scenario injured tall fescue two to seven times more than the standard treatment. Soil- and foliar-initiated repeat treatments were equivalent in most comparisons. Our data indicate that mesotrione applied in a temporal range to simulate controlled-release scenarios can deliver desired weed control efficacy comparable to sequential broadcast applications. More research is needed to elucidate proper timings and release scenarios to minimize turfgrass injury.

Keywords

Mesotrionedandelion, Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg. TAROFgoosegrass, Eleusine indica L. ELEINnimblewill, Muhlenbergia schreberi J.F. Gmel. MUHSCsmooth crabgrass, Digitaria ischaemum Schreb. ex Muhl. DIGISwhite clover, Trifolium repens L. TRFREcreeping bentgrass, Agrostis stolonifera L. AGSSTtall fescueFestuca arundinacea Schreb. FESARBleaching herbicidestriketone herbicidesslow releaseturfgrass injury
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2021 , pp. 582 - 588
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Scott McElroy, Auburn University

References

Akobundu, IO (1981) Weed control in direct-seeded lowland rice under poor water control conditions. Weed Res 21:273–278 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1981.tb00128.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2011) Tenacity® herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 100-1267. Greensboro, NC 27419. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. 6 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2018) Callisto® herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 100-1131. Greensboro, NC 27419. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. 6 pGoogle Scholar
Armel, GR, Wilson, HP, Richardson, RJ, Hines (2003) Mesotrione combinations in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 17:111–116 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0111:MCINTC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, RA (1992) Controlled release starch granule formulations reduce herbicide leaching in soil columns. Weed Technol 6:317–321 10.1017/S0890037X00034795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, JR, Willis, J, Rana, SS, Askew, SD (2017) Response of six turfgrass species and four weeds to three HPPD-inhibiting herbicides. Agron J 109:1777–1784 10.2134/agronj2016.06.0345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosnan, JT, Armel, GR, Klingeman, WE, Breeden, GK, Vargas, JJ, Flanagan, PC (2010) Selective star-of-bethlehem control with sulfentrazone and mixtures of mesotrione and topramezone with bromoxynil and bentazon in cool-season turfgrass. HortTechnol 20:315–318 10.21273/HORTTECH.20.2.315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, R, Hermosín, MC, Carrizosa, MJ, Cornejo, J (2002) Inorganic and organic clays as carriers for controlled release of the herbicide hexazinone. J Agric Food Chem 50:2324–2330 10.1021/jf011360oCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, RL, Doglia, S, Mazak, RA, Samulski, ET (1973) Controlled release of herbicides—theory. Weed Sci 21:1–5 10.1017/S0043174500031556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, RF, Wauchope, RD, Johnson, AW, Burgoa, B, Pepperman, AB (1996) Release of fenamiphos, atrazine, and alachlor into flowing water from granules and spray deposits of conventional and controlled-release formulations. J Agric Food Chem 44:2900–2907 10.1021/jf950131xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, E, Giraudo, M, Goujon, E, Halma, M, Knhili, E, Stauffert, M, Batisson, I, Besse-Hoggan, P, Bohatier, J, Bouchard, P, Celle-Jeanton, H (2017) Fate and ecotoxicological impact of new generation herbicides from the triketone family: an overview to assess the environmental risks. J Hazard Mater 325:136–156 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.059CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duray, SA, Davies, F (1987) Efficacy of prodiamine for weed control in container grown landscape plants under high temperature production conditions. J Environ Hort 5:82–84 Google Scholar
Elmore, MT, Brosnan, JT, Kopsell, DA, Breeden, GK (2011) Methods of assessing bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) responses to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides. Crop Sci 51:2840–2845 10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmore, MT, Brosnan, JT, Breeden, GK, Patton, AJ (2013) Mesotrione, topramezone, and amicarbazone combinations for postemergence annual bluegrass (Poa annua) control. Weed Technol 27:596–603 10.1614/WT-D-12-00153.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Research Methods in Weed Science. Pp 29–46 Google Scholar
Galán-Jiménez, MC, Morillo, E, Bonnemoy, F, Mallet, C, Undabeytia, T (2020) A sepiolite-based formulation for slow release of the herbicide mesotrione. Appl Clay Sci 189:105503 10.1016/j.clay.2020.105503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstl, Z, Nasser, A, Mingelgrin, U (1998) Controlled release of pesticides into water from clay−polymer formulations. J Agric Food Chem 46:3803–3809 10.1021/jf980184pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, MJ, Askew, SD, Willis, JB, Keese, RJ, James, JR (2007) Effect of dew and granular formulation on mesotrione efficacy for lawn weed control. Page 84 in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Baltimore, MD: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Goddard, MJ, Willis, JB, Askew, SD (2010) Application placement and relative humidity affects smooth crabgrass and tall fescue response to mesotrione. Weed Sci 58:67–72 10.1614/WS-09-107.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, CG, Ricker, DB, Askew, SD (2021) Perennial ryegrass phytotoxicity increases with mesotrione rate and growth-promoting environmental conditions. Crop Science, https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermosin, MC, Calderón, MJ, Aguer, JP, Cornejo, J (2001) Organoclays for controlled release of the herbicide fenuron. Pest Manag Sci 57:803–809 10.1002/ps.359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarrell, WM, Boersma, L (1980) Release of urea by granules of sulfur-coated urea. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:418–422 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020042xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnok, KJ (1986) The segregation of homogeneous and blended granular fertilizers from a rotary spreader. Agron J 78:258–260 10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800020008xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koscelny, JA, Peeper, TF (1996) Herbicides impregnated onto granular fertilizer carriers for broadleaf weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 10:526–530 10.1017/S0890037X00040380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J, Li, Y, Dong, H (2008) Controlled release of herbicide acetochlor from clay/carboxylmethylcellulose gel formulations. J Agric Food Chem 56:1336–1342 10.1021/jf072530lCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, MA, Smeda, RJ, Howard, KD, Reddy, KN (1996) Clomazone volatilization under varying environmental conditions. Chemosphere 33:1213–1225 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00260-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughner, DL, Nolting, SP (2010) Influence of foliar moisture on postemergent granule herbicide control of white clover and dandelion in cool-season turf. Appl Turf Sci 7:1–6 10.1094/ATS-2010-0713-01-RSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, JS, Breeden, GK, Sorochan, JC (2007) Hybrid bluegrass tolerance to postemergence applications of mesotrione and quinclorac. Weed Technol 21:807–811 10.1614/WT-06-200.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, MS (1983) Analysis of combined experiments. Agron J 75:153–155 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500010041xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G, Bartlett, DW, Fraser, TEM, Hawkes, TR, Holt, DC, Townson, JK, Wichert, RA (2001) Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag Sci 57:120–128 10.1002/1526-4998(200102)57:2<120::AID-PS254>3.0.CO;2-E3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prado, AG, Moura, AO, Nunes, AR (2011) Nanosized silica modified with carboxylic acid as support for controlled release of herbicides. J Agric Food Chem 59:8847–8852 10.1021/jf202509gCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashidzadeh, A, Olad, A, Hejazi, MJ (2017) Controlled release systems based on intercalated paraquat onto montmorillonite and clinoptilolite clays encapsulated with sodium alginate. Adv Polym Technol 36:177–185 10.1002/adv.21597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, MM, White, MD, Wing, RE, Trimnell, D, Shasha, BS (1988) Bioactivity of controlled release formulations of starch-encapsulated EPTC. J Control Release 7:237–242 10.1016/0168-3659(88)90056-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirvani, M, Farajollahi, E, Bakhtiari, S, Ogunseitan, OA (2014) Mobility and efficacy of 2,4-D herbicide from slow-release delivery systems based on organo-zeolite and organo-bentonite complexes. J Environ Sci Health B 49:255–262 10.1080/03601234.2014.868275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sopeña, F, Cabrera, A, Maqueda, C, Morillo, E (2005) Controlled release of the herbicide norflurazon into water from ethylcellulose formulations. J Agric Food Chem 53:3540–3547 10.1021/jf048007dCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sopeña, F, Cabrera, A, Maqueda, C, Morillo, E (2007) Ethylcellulose formulations for controlled release of the herbicide alachlor in a sandy soil. J Agric Food Chem 55:8200–8205 10.1021/jf071459gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, TM, Meyer, WA, McCullough, PE, Yu, J (2019) Evaluation of mesotrione tolerance levels and [14C]mesotrione absorption and translocation in three fine fescue species. Weed Sci 67:497–503 10.1017/wsc.2019.39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, KD, Kells, JJ, Penner, D (1988) Comparison of application methods and tillage practices on volatilization of clomazone. Weed Technol 2:323–326 10.1017/S0890037X00030670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J, Wilkins, RM (2000) Controlled release of a herbicide from matrix granules based on solvent-fractionated organosolv lignins. J Agric Food Chem 48:3651–3661 10.1021/jf0004208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J, Wilkins, RM (2003) Controlled release of the herbicide, fluometuron, from matrix granules based on fractionated organosolv lignins. J Agric Food Chem 51:4023–4028 10.1021/jf026092oCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed