Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T06:32:00.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil as Herbicide Carrier for Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Control in Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Birhanu Kinfe
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078

Abstract

The efficacy of herbicides applied broadcast by hand with a soil carrier or sprayed with water carrier were compared for Italian ryegrass control in winter wheat in central Oklahoma. Italian ryegrass was controlled 77 to 100% with BAY SMY 1500, chlorsulfuron, and CGA-131036 applied with both carriers. Metribuzin applied POST with 187 L ha–1 water was less phytotoxic to Italian ryegrass and wheat than with 200 kg ha–1 soil. All herbicides applied with 200 kg ha–1 silt loam soil as carrier at two locations controlled Italian ryegrass 96 to 100%. Increasing herbicide rate, soil carrier quantity, or broadcasting soil-carried herbicide in two directions rather than one did not significantly improve herbicide efficacy over that of conventional spraying.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. L. 1986. Metribuzin and chlorsulfuron effect on grain of treated winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:734737.Google Scholar
2. Appleby, A. P., Olson, P. D., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68:463466.Google Scholar
3. Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Differential tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to cyanazine and triazinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:569575.Google Scholar
4. Biljon, J. J. van, Hugo, K. J., and Iwanzik, W. 1988. Triasulfuron: a new broadleaf herbicide in wheat and barley. Appl. Plant Sci. 2:4952.Google Scholar
5. Dale, J. E. 1987. Smooth cone spreader for application of dry herbicide formulations. Weed Sci. 35:438443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Danielson, L. L. 1955. Comparison of granular and spray applications of herbicides on vegetable crops. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 121:8995.Google Scholar
7. Ellen, H. J. 1982. Assessment of longitudinal distribution by granular pesticides applicators. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 27:397413.Google Scholar
8. Griffin, J. L. 1986. Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:98100.Google Scholar
9. Holm, L. 1971. The role of weeds in human affairs. Weed Sci. 19:485490.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, R. R. 1983. Granular application equipment, the state of the art and current problems. p. 5559. in Syemour, K. G., ed. Pesticides Formulations and Application Systems: Second Conf. ASTM.Google Scholar
11. Khalifa, M. A., Wittmuss, H. D., and Burnside, O. D. 1983. Subsurface placement methods for metribuzin and trifluralin. Weed Sci. 31:840844.Google Scholar
12. Khodayari, K., Frans, R. E., and Collins, F. C. 1983. Diclofop – a selective herbicide for Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 31:436438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kinfe, B., and Megenasa, T. 1984. Frequency of handweeding on weed control and yield of tef (Eragrostis tef). Ethiopian J. Agric. Sci. 6:88100.Google Scholar
14. Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, A. D. 1987. Interference of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed. Sci. 35:819823.Google Scholar
15. Lowery, R. F. 1987. Granular formulations and application. p. 165176. in McWhorter, C. G., and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. Monogr. Ser. No. 4, Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Google Scholar
16. Nelson, L. R. 1986. Control of annual ryegrass in winter wheat with herbicides. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. 4354, 9 p.Google Scholar
17. Parker, C. 1972. The role of weed science in developing countries. Weed Sci. 20:408413.Google Scholar
18. Polon, J. A. 1973. Pesticide formulations. p. 143219. in Van Volkensburg, , ed. Formulation of Pesticidal Dusts, Wettable Powders and Granules. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
19. Ross, H. W. 1983. Available granular carriers properties and general processing methods. p. 3234. in Syemour, K. G. ed. Pesticides Formulations and Application Systems, Second Conf. ASTM.Google Scholar
20. Ross, M. A., and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. MacMillan, New York. p. 107109.Google Scholar
21. Roy, C. 1986. Triasulfuron: a new molecule for weed control in small grains. Comptes Rendus de la 13e Conference du COLUMA from Weed Abstr. 37:445(3801).Google Scholar
22. Runyan, T. J., McNeil, W. L., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:9497.Google Scholar
23. Sawyer, E. W. 1983. Introduction to granular pesticide formulations and processing. p. 2631. in Syemour, K. G., ed. Pesticides Formulations and Applications Systems: Second Conf., ASTM.Google Scholar
24. Selleck, G. W. 1961. Recent advances in the chemical control of wild oats. Weeds 9:6071.Google Scholar
25. Sweet, R. D., Garvin, C., and Donald, C. 1958. A comparison of granular and liquid carriers for herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 12:2532.Google Scholar
26. Tanji, A., and Regehr, D. L. 1988. Weeding and nitrogen effects on farmers' wheat crops in semi-arid Morocco. Weed Res. 28:101109.Google Scholar
27. Young, D. S., Fisher, M. H., and Shenk, M. 1978. Selecting appropriate weed control systems for developing countries. Weed Sci. 26:209212.Google Scholar