Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:28:18.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Insecticide and Placement Influence Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance to Nicosulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John A. Bailey  and
George Kapusta
John A. Bailey
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate corn tolerance to nicosulfuron following in-furrow or surface-band applications of seven soil-applied insecticides. The organophosphate insecticides evaluated included terbufos (15G and 20CR formulations), phorate, chlorpyrifos, fonofos, and DPX-43898, as well as the synthetic pyrethroid tefluthrin. Potential for a nicosulfuron/ insecticide interaction to injure corn was ranked as follows: terbufos 15G = phorate > terbufos 20CR > fonofos. Chlorpyrifos, DPX-43898, or tefluthrin followed by nicosulfuron caused no significant corn injury. Corn injury and yield reduction were greater in corn treated in-furrow compared with surface-band. Soil moisture at nicosulfuron application was more influential in causing corn injury and loss of yield than growth stage of corn at nicosulfuron application.

Keywords

Chlorpyrifos O,O-diethyl-O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioateDPX-43898 O-O-diethyl O-(1,2,2,2-tetrachloro-ethyl)phosphorothioatefonofos O-ethyl S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioatenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamidephorate O,O-diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl]phosphorodithioatetefluthrin, (2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-methylphenyl)methyl-(1α,3α)-(Z-(±)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylateterbufos, S-[(tert-butylthio)methyl]-O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioatecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3394.’Insecticideinsecticide-herbicide interactionchlorpyrifosDPX-43898fonofosphoratetefluthrinterbufos
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 598 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Biediger, D. L., Baumann, P. A., Weaver, D. N., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1992. Interactions between primisulfuron and selected soil-applied insecticides in corn. Weed Technol. 6:807–812.Google Scholar
2. Bowling, C. C. and Flinchum, W. T. 1968. Interaction of propanil with insecticides applied as seed treatments on rice. J. Econ. Entomol. 16:67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brown., H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chaleff, R. S. and Ray, T. B. 1987. Herbicide-resistant mutants from tobacco cell cultures. Science 223:1148–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chiou, C. T., Peters, L. J., and Freed, V. H. 1979. A physical concept of soil water equilibria for nonionic organic compounds. Science. 206:831–832.Google Scholar
6. El-Refai, A. R. and Movafy, M. 1973. Interaction of propanil with insecticides absorbed from soil and translocated into rice plants. Weed Sci. 21:246–248.Google Scholar
7. Felsot, A. S. and Dahm, P. A. 1979. Sorption of organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides by soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:557–563.Google Scholar
8. Felsot, A. S. and Lew, A. 1989. Factors affecting bioactivity of soil insecticides: relationships among uptake, desorption, and toxicity of carbofuran and terbufos. J. Econ. Entomol. 82:389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Frazier, T. L., Smart, J. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Meinke, L. J. 1991. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron activity as influenced by terbufos formulation and application method. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:216–218.Google Scholar
10. Hacskaylo, J., Walker, J. K. Jr., and Pires, E. G. 1964. Response of cotton seedlings to combinations of preemergence herbicides and systemic insecticides. Weeds 12:288–291.Google Scholar
11. Hammond, R. B. 1983. Phytotoxicity of soybean caused by the interaction of insecticide-nematicides and metribuzin. J. Econ. Entomol. 76:17–19.Google Scholar
12. Hayes, R. M., Yeargan, K. V., Witt, W. W., and Raney, H. B. 1979. Interaction of selected insecticide-herbicide combinations on soybeans. Weed Sci. 27:51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Holshouser, D. L., Chandler, J. M., and Smith, H. R. 1991. The influence of terbufos on the response of five corn cultivars to CGA-136872. Weed Technol. 5:165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Johnson, B. J. 1970. Combinations of herbicides and other pesticides on soybeans. Weed Sci. 18:128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1992. Interaction of terbufos and nicosulfuron on corn. Weed Technol. 6:999–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Khosro, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Tugwell, N. P. 1986. Interaction of propanil and selected insecticides on rice. Weed Sci. 34:800–803.Google Scholar
17. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130–136.Google Scholar
18. Nash, R. G. 1967. Phytotoxic pesticide interactions in soil. Agron. J. 59:227–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Nash, R. G. 1968. Synergistic phytotoxicities of herbicide-insecticide combinations in soil. Weed Sci. 16:74–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar