Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:54:56.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Soil Probe System to Evaluate Weed Seed Survival in Soil Disinfestation Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

Mark Hoffmann  and
Steven A. Fennimore
Mark Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher and Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905
Steven A. Fennimore
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher and Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: mhoffmann@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed seed viability is an important parameter to assess the efficacy of soil disinfestation methods like fumigation and steam. In field experiments, seed samples are commonly placed in permeable bags and buried at several depths in soil before the application of soil disinfestation treatments. The seed samples are recovered several days to weeks after treatment and then seed viability is determined in the laboratory. The process of sample installation and recovery is time consuming and may expose personnel to hazardous conditions such as heat or fumigants. Described is a custom soil probe system, developed to simplify installation and recovery of weed seeds from soil. Each soil probe is capable of holding weed seed samples at three different depths up to 30 cm. The following hypothesis was tested: viability of weed seeds is similarly affected by soil disinfestation treatments whether the seeds were contained in the soil probe system or seed bag assays. Two different soil disinfestation trials were conducted: (1) a repeated micro-plot study (USDA Salinas, 1 m-2), using steam as a soil disinfestation treatment and (2) a field study in a commercial strawberry field with 1,3-dicloropropene plus chloropicrin (Pic-Clor 60) as soil disinfestation method. In both studies, seed viability of burning nettle, common knotweed, and common purslane (tetrazolium assay) and germination rates of yellow nutsedge tubers were assessed. Results indicate that the soil probe system can be used as an alternative to the seed bag assay to assess weed control efficacy of described soil disinfestation methods.

Keywords

1,3-Dicloropropenechloropicrinburning nettle, Urtica urens L.common knotweed, Polygonum arenastrum Boreaucommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L.yellow nutsedge Cyperus esculentus L.Safetyseed bag assaysoil probe systemviabilityweed management
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 752 - 760
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Cammy Willett, University of Arkansas

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2015) Pic-Clor 60® Material Safety Data Sheet. Hollister, CA: TriCal Inc. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Baalbaki, RZ, Elias, SG, Marcos-Filho, J, McDonald, MB (2009) Seed Vigor Testing Handbook. Contribution No. 32. Washington, DC: Association of Official Seed Analysts. Pp 234–315Google Scholar
Cottrell, HJ (1947) Tetrazolium salt as a seed germination indicator. Nature 159:748 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunger, W, Schulz, HJ, Zimdars, B (2002) Colonization behaviour of Collembola under different conditions of dispersal. Pedobiologia 46:316–327 Google Scholar
Eisenbeis, G, Dogan, H, Hebier, T, Kerber, A, Lenz, A, Paulus, F (1995) Das minicontainersystem – ein bodenoegologisches werkzeug fuer forschung und praxis. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft 76:585–588 Google Scholar
Eisenbeis, G, Lenz, R, Dogan, H, Schuler, G (1996) Zur biologischen aktivitaet von nadelwaldboeden: messung der tierischen frassaktivitaet mit dem koederstreifen-test sowie bestimmung von streuabbauraten mit dem minicontainer-test. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fuer Oekologie 26:305–311 Google Scholar
Eisenbeis, G, Lenz, R, Heiber, T (1999) Organic residue decomposition: the minicontainer-system a multifunctional tool in decomposition studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 6:220–224 Google Scholar
Fennimore, SA, Martin, FN, Miller, TC, Broome, JC, Dorn, N, Greene, I (2014) Evaluation of a mobile steam applicator for soil disinfestation in California strawberry. HortScience 49:1542–1549 Google Scholar
Fennimore, SA, Wilen, C, Hoffmann, M, Gerik, J, Martin, F, Koike, S, Westerdahl, B, Stanghellini, M (2015) Integrated Fumigant and Non-Fumigant Soil Disinfestation Systems for Flower and Strawberry, Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach. https://www.mbao.org/static/docs/confs/2015-sandiego/papers/64fennimores.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2017Google Scholar
Fennimore, SA, Wilen, C, Hoffmann, M, Gerik, J, Marin, F, Stanghellini, M (2016) Integrated Soil Disinfestation Systems for Flower and Strawberry, Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach. https://www.mbao.org/static/docs/confs/2016-orlando/papers/17fennimores.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2017Google Scholar
Hagemann, U, Moroni, MT (2015) Moss and lichen decomposition in old-growth and harvested high-boreal forests estimated using the litterbag and minicontainer methods. Soil Biol Biochem 87:10–24 Google Scholar
Janis, J (2016) Allyl Isothiocyanate Petition for Inclusion on the National List for Use in Organic Crop Production. Morrisville, NC: Isagro USA Inc. 354 p https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/AITC%20Petition.pdf Accessed February 15, 2017Google Scholar
Klose, S, Ajwa, AA, Browne, GT, Subbarao, KV, Martin, FN, Fennimore, SA, Westerdahl, BB (2008) Dose response of weed seeds, plant-parasitic nematodes, and pathogens to twelve rates of metam sodium in a California soil. Plant Dis 92:1537–1546 Google Scholar
Kreyling, J, Haei, M, Laudon, H (2013) Snow removal reduces cellulose decomposition in a riparian boreal forest. Canad J Soil Sci 93:427–433 Google Scholar
Kula, C, Reombke, J (1998) Evaluation of soil ecotoxicity tests with functional endpoints for the risk assessment of plant protection products. Environ Sci Pollut Res 5:55–60 Google Scholar
Lehmitz, R, Russell, D, Hohberg, K, Christian, A, Xylander, WER (2012) Active dispersal of oribatid mites into young soils. Applied Soil Ecol 55:10–19 Google Scholar
Lenz, R, Eisenbeis, G (1998a) An extraction method for nematodes in decomposition studies using the minicontainer-method. Plant Soil 198:109–116 Google Scholar
Lenz, R, Eisenbeis, G (1998b) The vertical distribution of decomposition activity and of litter-colonizing nematodes in soils under different litter tillage. Pedobiologia 42:193–204 Google Scholar
Marwitz, A, Ladewig, E, Maelaender, B (2011) Impact of herbicide strategies on earthworm population and soil fauna activity in sugarbeet as affected by soil tillage and site characteristics. Zuckerindustrie 136:41–52 Google Scholar
Noling, J (2016) Evaluation of Fumigant Alternatives in Florida Strawberry 2015-16, Methyl Bromide Alternative Outreach. https://www.mbao.org/static/docs/confs/2016-orlando/papers/25nolingjlargescaledemo.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2017Google Scholar
Paulus, R, Roembke, J, Ruf, A, Beck, L (1999) A comparison of the litterbag-, minicontainer- and bait-lamina-methods in an ecotoxicological field experiment with diflubenzuron and btk. Pedobiologia 43:120–133 Google Scholar
Samtani, JB, Ajwa, HA, Weber, JB, Browne, GT, Klose, S, Hunzie, J, Fennimore, SA (2011) Evaluation of non-fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for weed control and crop yield in California strawberries (Fragaria ananassa L.). Crop Prot 30:45–51 Google Scholar
Samtani, JB, Gilbert, C, Weber, B, Subbarao, KV, Goodhue, RE, Fennimore, SA (2012) Effect of steam and solarization treatments on pest control, strawberry yield, and economic returns relative to methyl bromide fumigation. HortScience 47:64–70 Google Scholar
Sekiyama, Y, Mizukami, Y, Takada, A, Shoko, N (1993) Vapor pressure and stability of allyl isothiocyanate. J Food Hyg Soc Jpn 35:365–370 Google Scholar
Sturm, M Jr, Sturm, M, Eisenbeis, G (2002) Recovery of the biological activity in a vineyard soil after landscape redesign: A three-year study using the bait-lamina method. Vitis 41:43–45 Google Scholar
Wolfarth, F, Schrader, S, Oldenburg, E, Weinert, J (2013) Nematode-collembolan-interaction promotes the degradation of Fusarium biomass and deoxynivalenol according to soil texture. Soil Biol Biochem 57:903–910 Google Scholar
Wolfarth, F, Wedekind, S, Schrader, S, Oldenburg, E, Brunotte, J (2015) Regulation of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol by Folsomia candida (Collembola) and Aphelenchoides saprohilus (Nematoda) in an on-farm experiment. Pedobiologia 58:41–47 Google Scholar