Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:49:18.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil-Applied Herbicide and Soil-Temperature Effects in Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ernest Nkwen-Tamo ,
L. S. Jeffery ,
Laren R. Robison  and
Von D. Jolley
Ernest Nkwen-Tamo
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Hortic., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602
L. S. Jeffery
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Hortic., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602
Laren R. Robison
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Hortic., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602
Von D. Jolley
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Hortic., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effects and interactions of two soil temperatures, 19 ± 1 and 27 ± 3 C, and seven soil-applied herbicide treatments on the morphological development and concentrations of eight essential nutrients in leaves, stems, and roots of pinto beans were determined. Soil temperature did not affect overall plant morphology but did affect some nutrient concentrations in the roots, stems, and leaves. Combinations of alachlor plus trifluralin at 2.2 plus 0.28 kg ai/ha and EPTC plus trifluralin at 2.2 plus 0.28 kg ai/ha caused greater negative effects than when the herbicides were applied separately. Oryzalin at 0.56 kg ai/ha and EPTC at 3.4 kg ai/ha induced the least number of morphological effects, while alachlor at 3.4 kg ai/ha, chloramben at 2.2 kg ai/ha, and trifluralin applied at 0.56 kg ai/ha produced an intermediate number. Alachlor, trifluralin, and combinations of alachlor plus trifluralin and EPTC plus trifluralin inhibited nodule growth. Each herbicide affected different nutrients. Alachlor plus trifluralin affected the level of each nutrient in at least one plant tissue. Many herbicide-soil temperature interactions occurred.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamidechloramben, 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acidEPTC, S-ethyl dipropylcarbamothioateoryzalin, 4-(dipropylamino)-3,5-dinitrobenzenesulfonamidetrifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminepinto beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L.AlachlorcalciumchlorambencopperEPTCmagnesiummanganesenitrogennodule growthoryzalinphosphoruspotassiumpreemergence herbicidesroot-temperature-herbicide interactiontrifluralinzinc
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 573 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agricultural Statistics Board. 1988. Crop production. Issue CrPr 2-2 (12–88). Nat. Agric. Stat. Serv., USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. Aitken, J. B. 1975. Weed control in snapbeans with dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:172–178.Google Scholar
3. Basler, E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1975. Effects of trifluralin on the absorption and translocation of phosphate and rubidium by soybean seedlings. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:316–319.Google Scholar
4. Bagley, P. C., and Beste, C. E. 1980. New herbicides for narrow-row snapbeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:176–186.Google Scholar
5. Behran, S., Maftoun, M., Sheibany, B., and Hojjati, S. M. 1979. Effect of fertilizer-N, and herbicides on the growth and N content of soybeans and cowpeas. Agron. J. 71:533–538.Google Scholar
6. Bollich, P. K., Dunigan, E. P., Kitchen, L. M., and Taylor, V. 1988. The influence of trifluralin and pendimethalin on nodulation, N2(C2H2) fixation and seed yield of field-grown soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:15–19.Google Scholar
7. Bucholtz, D. L., and Lavy, T. L. 1979. Alachlor and trifluralin effects on nutrient uptake in oats and soybeans. Agron. J. 71:24–26.Google Scholar
8. Cathey, G. W., and Sabbe, W. E. 1972. Effects of trifluralin on fertilizer phosphorus uptake patterns by cotton and soybean seedlings. Agron. J. 64:254–255.Google Scholar
9. Chaplin, M. H. 1970. Use of atomic absorption spectrophotometer and chemical methods of plant-analysis. Hortic. Dep., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
10. Devlin, R. M., Zbiec, I. I., and Karczmarczyk, S. J. 1982. Influence of napropamide on the uptake and translocation of mineral nutrients. Weed Sci. 30:503–506.Google Scholar
11. Drew, M. C., and Biddulph, O. 1971. Effect of metabolic inhibitors and temperature on uptake and translocation of 45Ca and 42K by intact bean plants. Plant Physiol. 48:426–432.Google Scholar
12. Fanning, C. 1981. Fertilization. p. 1314. in Dry Bean Production Handbook. N.D. Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. No. A-602.Google Scholar
13. Horwitz, W. 1980. Official methods of analysts. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. p. 127–128.Google Scholar
14. Klepper, L. A. 1976. Nitrite accumulation within herbicide-treated leaves. Weed Sci. 24:533–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lesniuc, O. 1974. Influence of herbicides on the development of nodule bacteria on the roots of soybeans. Proc. 12th Brit. Weed Control Conf. 3:1101–1108.Google Scholar
16. Maftoun, M., Bassiri, A., Sameni, A. M., and Yasrebi, J. 1982. Growth and chemical composition of soybeans as affected by trifluralin and soil salinity. Weed Res. 22:89–94.Google Scholar
17. Mellis, J. M., Pillai, P., Davis, D. E., and Truelove, B. 1982. Metolachlor and alachlor effects on membrane permeability and lipid synthesis. Weed Sci. 30:399–404.Google Scholar
18. Moody, K., Kust, C. A., and Buchholtz, K. P. 1970. Uptake of herbicides by soybean roots in culture solutions. Weed Sci. 18:642–647.Google Scholar
19. Parker, C., and Fryer, J. D. 1975. Weed control problems causing major reductions in world food supplies. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 23:83–95.Google Scholar
20. Pavlista, A. D. 1980. A comparative study of pendimethalin and trifluralin on soybean and cotton root systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:257–267.Google Scholar
21. Prosch, S. D., and Weber, J. B. 1983. The synergistic interaction of alachlor and trifluralin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:359–365.Google Scholar
22. Putnam, A. R., and Rice, R. P. Jr. 1979. Environmental and edaphic influences on the selectivity of alachlor on snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 27:570–574.Google Scholar
23. Ramie, R. J., and Dubetz, S. 1984. Effect of fungicides and herbicides on nodulation and N2 fixation in soybean fields lacking indigenous Rhizobium japonicum . Agron. J. 76:451–454.Google Scholar
24. Rice, R. P. Jr., and Putnam, A. R. 1980. Temperature influences on uptake, translocation and metabolism of alachlor in snapbeans. Weed Sci. 28:131–134.Google Scholar
25. Struckmeyer, B. E., Binning, L. K., and Harvey, R. G. 1976. Effect of dinitroaniline herbicides in a soil medium on snapbean and soybean. Weed Sci. 24:366–369.Google Scholar
26. Teasdale, J. R., and Frank, J. R. 1982. Weed control systems for narrow and wide row snapbean production. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:1164–1167.Google Scholar
27. Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:484–486.Google Scholar
28. Wilson, H. P., Stewart, F. B., and Hines, T. E. 1976. Effect of temperature on response of tomatoes to several dinitroaniline herbicides and phosphorus. Weed Sci. 24:115–119.Google Scholar
29. Wyse, D. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Factors affecting EPTC injury to navy bean. Weed Sci. 24:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed Crop Competition. Int. Plant Prot. Cent., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis. p. 131–135.Google Scholar