Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:42:58.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Thifensulfuron and Bentazon Combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen E. Hart  and
Gordon K. Roskamp
Stephen E. Hart*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Gordon K. Roskamp
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455
*
E-mail address of corresponding author: s-hart2@uiuc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at three locations in Illinois to determine soybean response to combinations of thifensulfuron and bentazon. Thifensulfuron was applied at 2.2 to 8.8 g ai/ha alone or in combination with 280 to 560 g/ha of bentazon. Soybean injury 30 d after treatment ranged from 0 to 22% when thifensulfuron was applied alone at 2.2 g/ha. Increasing thifensulfuron rate to 8.8 g/ha increased soybean injury to a range of 12 to 44%. Soybean grain yield was significantly reduced compared to the yield of untreated soybean when thifensulfuron was applied at 4.4 and 8.8 g/ha in two of five and four of five experiments, respectively. The addition of bentazon to thifensulfuron consistently reduced soybean injury and stunting. In many cases, increasing the bentazon rate to 420 g/ha decreased soybean injury from thifensulfuron to a greater extent than 280 g/ha. In cases where thifensulfuron decreased soybean yield, the addition of 420 or 560 g/ha of bentazon restored yields to levels that were not lower than untreated soybeans. These studies demonstrate that thifensulfuron at 2.2 to 8.8 g/ha in combination with bentazon at 420 g/ha may be safely applied to soybean for broadleaf weed control.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3 benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidethifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidsoybean, Glycine max L.Herbicide interactionherbicide injuryCOC, crop oil concentrateDAT, days after treatmentMSO, methylated seed oilNIS, nonionic surfactantUAN, urea ammonium nitrate
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., 1990. Enhancement of soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4:524–528.Google Scholar
Ambach, R. M., Toole, B. M., Zadorozyn, S. A., Johnson, K. D., Ulrich, T. S., Gorrell, R. M., and Schehl, S. E. 1984. DPX-M6316: a new herbicide for use in cereals. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:120.Google Scholar
Amuti, K. S., Claus, J. S., and Maxey, F. B. 1987. DPX-M6316: postemergence herbicide for soybeans. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 42:45.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996a. Basagran product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996b. Pinnacle product label. Wilmington, DE: Dupont.Google Scholar
Ateh, C. M., Harvey, R. G., Albright, J. M., and Anthon, T. M. 1995. Yield penalties associated with soybean injury from postemergence herbicides. Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:374–375.Google Scholar
Ateh, C. M., Harvey, R. G., Albright, J. M., Anthon, T. M., and Kutil, J. L. 1994. Yield penalties associated with soybean injury from postemergence herbicides. Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:282–283.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1995a. ‘Olathe’ pinto bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>) tolerance to postemergence imazethapyr and bentazon. Weed Sci. 43:276–282.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1995b. Response of selected weed species to postemergence imazethapyr and bentazon. Weed Technol. 9:236–242.Google Scholar
Fielding, R. J., and Stoller, E. W. 1990. Effects of additives on the efficacy, uptake, and translocation of the methyl ester of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M., 1991. Maximizing herbicide efficiency with mixtures of expert systems. Weed Technol. 5:894–897.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., 1997. Interacting effects of MON 12000 and CGA-152005 with other herbicides on velvetleaf (<i>Abutilon theophrasti</i>). Weed Sci. 45:434–438.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., and Maxwell, D. J. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in corn. Dekalb. Illinois, 1995. Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:128–129.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., Wax, L. M., Hager, A. G., and Maxwell, D. J. 1994. Bentazon/thifensulfuron interaction in soybean postemergence weed control. Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:247.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L., and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., and Corbin, F. T. 1989, Effect of ammonium sulfate and bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 3:671–677.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R., and Kapusta, G. 1994. Corn weed control with CGA-152005 plus companion postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:70.Google Scholar
Owen, M.D.K., Lux, J. F., and Pecinovsky, K. T. 1994. Evaluation of CGA-152005 combinations applied postemergence for weed management in corn, Ames. Iowa, 1994. Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:157.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N., and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass (<i>Eleusine indica</i> L.). Weed Sci. 32:595–597.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. The basis of bentazon antagonism on sethoxydim absorption and activity. Weed Sci. 37:400–404.Google Scholar