Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:21:50.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Growth and Yield as Influenced by Duration of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kenneth J. Kirkland
Kenneth J. Kirkland*
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Exp. Farm, P.O. Box 10, Scott, Saskatchewan, Canada S0K 4A0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of duration of wild oat competition on spring wheat yield and growth was determined in time-of-removal experiments conducted over a three year study period in Saskatchewan, Canada. Failure to remove wild oat reduced wheat yield 28 and 39% at wild oat populations of 64 and 188 plants per m2, respectively. Wheat yield was not reduced by wild oat densities of 64 or 118 plants per m2 until the six- and seven-leaf stage of wild oat, respectively. Removing wild oat at 64 plants per m2 before the seven-leaf stage and 118 plants per m2 before the five-leaf stage did not increase wheat culm or fresh weight production.

Keywords

Wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Neepawa’wild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAFresh weightcompetitionleaf stageAVEFA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 890 - 893
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bowden, B. A. and Friesen, G. 1967. Competition of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in wheat and flax. Weed Res. 7:349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1974. The time of onset of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and spring cereals. Weed Res. 14:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., and Hall, A. E. 1991. Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestation on light interception and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 39:175–179.Google Scholar
4. Curran, W. S., Morrow, L. A., and Whitesides, R. E. 1987. Lentil (Lens culinaris) yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference. Weed Sci. 35:669–672.Google Scholar
5. Martin, M.P.L.D. and Field, R. J. 1987. Competition between vegetative plants of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Weed Res. 27:119–124.Google Scholar
6. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can. J. Res. 10:77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Peters, N.C.B. 1984. Time of onset of competition and effects of various fractions of an Avena fatua L. population in spring barley. Weed Res. 24:305–315.Google Scholar
8. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
9. Saskatchewan Agriculture. 1993. Weed control in field and forage crops 1993. 35 M-01/93, Regina, Saskatchewan. 144 p.Google Scholar
10. Satorre, E. H. and Snaydon, R. W. 1992. A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua L. Weed Res. 32:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1986. Weed survey of Saskatchewan cereal and oilseed crops, 1986. Weed Survey Series, Publ. 87-1, Agric. Canada, Regina. 251 p.Google Scholar