Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:03:45.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategies for Managing Early Succession Habitat for Wildlife

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Craig A. Harper
Craig A. Harper*
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: charper@utk.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early succession plant communities consisting of a diverse mixture of grasses, forbs, and scattered shrubs are required by a variety of wildlife species. Early seral stages follow some form of disturbance but can become dominated by shrubs and trees rather quickly, especially in areas with abundant rainfall and relatively long growing seasons, such as the southeastern United States. In the absence of natural disturbance regimes, the quality and maintenance of these plant communities for wildlife is largely dependent upon management. Prescribed fire, disking, herbicide applications, and mowing are practices commonly used to maintain early succession plant communities for various wildlife species throughout this region. Prescribed fire consumes vegetative debris, provides open structure at ground level, and facilitates travel and foraging for wildlife throughout the field. Burning during the dormant season may promote cool-season grasses if they are present in the field. Burning in late March or early April generally promotes warm-season grasses and forbs. Late growing-season fire (September) will reduce woody encroachment and may encourage additional forb cover. Disking promotes vegetation decomposition, provides open structure at ground level, and generally promotes annual plant species. Disking in the fall and winter stimulates more forb growth than disking in the spring, which will stimulate undesirable nonnative warm-season grasses if present in the seedbank. Selective herbicides can influence plant composition and can be used to encourage grasses where forbs dominate, to promote forbs where grasses dominate, and to reduce woody cover. Mowing during midsummer encourages additional grasses in fields dominated by forbs but is not recommended for field maintenance because mowing produces thatch, which limits the ability of several wildlife species to travel and forage through the field, suppresses the seedbank, and destroys nests and young wildlife. Several practices can be used in combination to meet specific objectives. Succession should be set back every 2 to 4 yr, depending on plant response and focal wildlife species. It is important to intersperse disturbance in space and time, so that a variety of cover types are always available, even to those animals with small home ranges.

Keywords

Diskingearly succession plant communitiesgrassland songbirdsmowingnative warm-season grassesnorthern bobwhiteprescribed fire
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 932 - 937
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ball, D. M., Hoveland, C. S., and Lacefield, G. D. 2002. Southern forages: modern concepts for forage crop management. 3rd ed. Norcross, GA Potash and Phosphate Institute.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. G., Madison, A. L., Sole, J. D., and Lacki, M. J. 1995. An assessment of habitat quality for northern bobwhite in tall fescue dominated fields. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 23:231–237.Google Scholar
Bond, B. T., Baumann, C. D., Lane, M. W. II, Thackston, R. E., and Bowman, J. L. 2005. Efficacy of herbicides to control bermudagrass for enhancement of northern bobwhite habitat. Proc. Ann. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 59:191–199.Google Scholar
Brennan, L. A. 1991. How can we reverse the northern bobwhite population decline? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 19:544–555.Google Scholar
Buckner, J. L. and Landers, J. L. 1979. Fire and disking effects on herbaceous food plants and seed supplies. J. Wildl. Manag. 43:807–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, L. W. Jr. 2000. Wildlife responses to the conservation reserve program in the southeast. in Holman, W.L., Halloum, D.J., ed. A Comprehensive Review of Farm Bill Contributions to Wildlife Conservation, 1985–2000. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Recourses Conservation Service, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Technical Report USDA/NRCS/WHMI-2000.Google Scholar
Burger, L. W. Jr., Kurzejeski, E. W., Dailey, T. V., and Ryan, M. R. 1990. Structural characteristics of vegetation in CRP fields in northern Missouri and their suitability as bobwhite habitat. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 55:74–83.Google Scholar
Delisle, J. M. and Savidge, J. A. 1997. Avian use and vegetation characteristics of Conservation Reserve Program fields. J. Wildl. Manag. 61:318–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimmick, R. W. 1971. Influence of controlled burning on nesting patterns of bobwhite in west Tennessee. Proc. Ann. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Game Fish Comm. 25:149–155.Google Scholar
Donovan, G. H. and Brown, T. C. 2007. Be careful what you wish for: the legacy of Smokey Bear. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5:73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykes, S. A. 2005. Effectiveness of native grassland restoration in restoring grassland bird communities in Tennessee. M.S. thesis. Knoxville, TN University of Tennessee. 117.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. L. and Engle, D. M. 1988. Effects of late summer fire on tallgrass prairie microclimate and community composition. Am. Midl. Nat. 120:212–223.Google Scholar
Fribourg, H. A., Wilkinson, S. R., and Rhodes, G. N. Jr. 1988. Switching from fungus—infected to fungus—free tall fescue. J. Prod. Agric. 1:122–127.Google Scholar
George, R. R., Farris, A. L., Schwartz, C. C., Humburg, D. D., and Coffey, J. C. 1979. Native prairie grass pastures as nest cover for upland birds. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 7:4–9.Google Scholar
Gill, D. E., Blank, P., Parks, J., Guerarad, J. B., Lohr, B., Schwartzman, B. E., Gruber, J. G., Dodge, G., Rewa, C. H., and Sears, H. F. 2006. Plants and breeding bird response on a managed Conservation Reserve Program grassland in Maryland. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34:944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giocomo, J. J. 2005. Conservation of grassland bird populations on military installations in the eastern United States with special emphasis on Fort Campbell Army Base, Kentucky. Ph.D Dissertation. Knoxville, TN University of Tennessee. 181.Google Scholar
Gruchy, J. P. 2007. An evaluation of field management practices to improve bobwhite habitat. M.S. thesis. Knoxville, TN University of Tennessee. 152.Google Scholar
Gruchy, J. P. and Harper, C. A. 2006. When is the best time to disk native warm-season grasses for wildlife? 296–303. in Sanderson, M.A., Adler, P., Goslee, S., Ritchie, J., Skinner, H., Soder, K. eds. Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern Native Grass Symposium. Madison, WI Omni.Google Scholar
Gruchy, J. P., Harper, C. A., and Gray, M. J. 2007. Methods for controlling woody invasion into old-fields in Tennessee. Proceedings of Sixth National Quail Symposium. Washington, DC National Resources Conservation Service In press. Google Scholar
Guthery, F. S. 1997. A philosophy of habitat management for northern bobwhites. J. Wildl. Manag. 61:291–301.Google Scholar
Harper, C. A., Bates, G. E., Hansbrough, M. P., Gudlin, M. J., Gruchy, J. P., and Keyser, P. D. 2007. Native warm-season grasses: identification, establishment, and management for wildlife and forage production in the mid-south—a manual for natural resource professionals and other land managers. Knoxville, TN University of Tennessee Extension Service PB 1752. 189.Google Scholar
Hazell, D. B. 1965. Vegetative composition, forage production, and plant vigor as influenced by date of mowing. J. Range Manag. 18:261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H. F. 2000. Grass response to seasonal burns in experimental plantings. J. Range Manag. 53:437–441.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. C., Buehler, D. A., Canterbury, R. A., Confer, J. L., and Hamel, P. B. 2001. Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29:440–455.Google Scholar
Hurst, G. A. 1972. Insects and bobwhite quail brood management. Pages 65–82. in Morrison, J.A., Lewis, J.C. eds. Proceedings of 1st National Quail Symposium. Stillwater, OK Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. S. and Hale, P. E. 2000. The historical foundations of prescribed burning for wildlife: a Southeastern perspective. Pages 11–23. in. The Role of Fire in Nongame Wildlife Management and Community Restoration: Traditional Uses and New Directions Proceedings of a Special Workshop. Newtown Square, PA U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northeastern Research Station.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R. A. 1990. Vegetation management: mowing to spraying. J. Arboric. 16:186–189.Google Scholar
Komarek, R. 1963. Fire and the changing wildlife habitat. Pages 35–43. in. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference. Tallahassee, FL Tall Timbers Research Station.Google Scholar
Lorimer, C. G. 2001. Historical and ecological roles of disturbance in eastern North American forests: 9000 years of change. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 83:425–439.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. F., Palmer, W. E., and Bromley, P. T. 2000. The effects of farm field borders on overwintering sparrow densities. Wilson Bull. 112:517–523.Google Scholar
McCoy, T. D., Kurzejeski, E. W., Burger, L. W. Jr., and Rayan, M. R. 2001. Effects of conservation practice, mowing, and temporal changes on vegetation structure on CRP fields in northern Missouri. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29:979–987.Google Scholar
Millenbah, K. F., Winterstein, S. R., Campa, H. III, Furrow, L. T., and Minnis, R. B. 1996. Effects of Conservation Reserve Program field age on avian relative abundance, diversity, and productivity. Wilson Bull. 108:760–770.Google Scholar
Pyne, S. J. 1982. Fire in America—a cultural history of wildland and rural fire. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press. 654.Google Scholar
Riebold, R. J. 1971. The early history of wildfires and prescribed burning. Proceedings of the Prescribed Burning Symposium 11–20. in Asheville, NC U.S. Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Roseberry, J. and Klimstra, W. D. 1984. Population Ecology of the Bobwhite. Carbondale, IL Southern Illinois University Press. 259.Google Scholar
Rosene, W. and Freeman, J. D. 1988. A Guide to the Flowering Plants and Their Seed Important to Bobwhite Quail. Augusta, GA Morris Communications.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E. 1989. Herbicides for killing tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with fescue endophyte (Acremonium coenophialum). Weed Technol. 3:485–489.Google Scholar
Smith, R. G. 2006. Timing of tillage is an important filter on assembly of weed communities. Weed Sci. 54:705–712.Google Scholar
Sun, C. 2006. Liability of using prescribed fires on forestlands and state legislation evolution. Pages 225–240. in Chang, S.J., Dunn, M.A. eds. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Southern Forest Economics Workshop. Mississippi State, MS Southern Forest Economics Workers, Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Towne, G. and Owensby, C. 1984. Long-term effects of annual burning at different dates in ungrazed Kansas tallgrass prairie. J. Range Manag. 37:392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, K. P. and Waller, S. S. 1990. Suppression of cool-season grasses with glyphosate and atrazine. Pages 29–31. in. Proceedings of the Forage and Grassland Conference. Elmhurst, IL American Forest and Grassland Council.Google Scholar
Wright, H. A. and Bailey, A. W. 1982. Fire ecology. New York J Wiley. 501.Google Scholar