Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:46:06.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Hybrids Respond Differently to Simulated Imazethapyr Carryover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas L. Rabaey  and
R. Gordon Harvey
Thomas L. Rabaey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison. WI 53706-1597
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison. WI 53706-1597
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eleven sweet corn hybrids representing a wide range of injury with imazethapyr in a greenhouse study were evaluated in simulated imazethapyr carryover field studies conducted at Arlington, WI. Imazethapyr at 0, 11, 22, and 44 g ai/ha was applied and incorporated 15 d prior to planting sweet corn. The greatest injury occurred 28 d after planting, with reductions in height ranging from 0 to 25%. Reductions in corn ear yields were similar all years for 10 of the 11 hybrids. Reductions in corn ear yield for ‘Crisp N’ Sweet 710,’ ‘Cornucopia,’ ‘Super Sweet Jubilee,’ ‘Excellency,’ and ‘DMC 20–35′ were less than for ‘Natural Sweet 9000,’ ‘Jubilee,’ ‘Zenith,’ ‘Green Giant 40,’ and ‘Green Giant 97.’ In 1992, plots were prepared for an actual imazethapyr carryover study by applying imazethapyr PPI at 70 and 140 g/ha and planting soybean. In 1993, four sweet corn hybrids were planted. Corn ear yield of Green Giant 97 was reduced following previous-year applications of 140 g/ha imazethapyr. Corn ear yields of Excellency, Super Sweet Jubilee, and Jubilee were not reduced at either actual carryover rate. These studies indicate variability among sweet corn hybrids in susceptibility to imazethapyr. Greenhouse results were indicative of field responses and may be useful as a rapid test to determine hybrid susceptibility.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.sweet corn, Zea mays LCrop rotationherbicide carryoversweet corn injurysweet corn toleranceDAP, days after planting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 92 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., and Fuerst, E. P. 1990. Carryover injury of clomazone applied in soybeans (Glycine max) and fallow. Weed Technol. 4:855–861.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A., 1992. Weed seedbank response to tillage, herbicides, and crop rotation sequence. Weed Sci. 40:654–659.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. A., and Gorski, S. F. 1989. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) endosperm mutants to chloracetamide and thiocarbamate herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:475–478.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookston, R. K. and Kurle, J. E. 1989. Corn residue effect on the yield of corn and soybean grown in rotation. Agron. J. 82:229–332.Google Scholar
Crookston, R. K., Kurle, J. E., and Lueschen, W. E. 1988. Relative ability of soybean, fallow, and triacontanol to alleviate yield reductions associated with growing corn continuously. Crop Sci. 28:145–147.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Knake, E. L., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Corn (Zea mays) injury following use of clomazone, chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:539–544.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Herbicide availability in soil. In Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 22–26.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. J., Lavey, T. L., and Gbur, E. E. Jr., 1990. Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:421–428.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Homogeneity of regression coefficients. In Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 372–379.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508–516.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G., and McNevin, G. R. 1990. Combining cultural practices and herbicides to control wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Technol. 4:433–439.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, W. G., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, imazethapyr, and DPX-PE350 injury to succeeding crops. Weed Technol. 7:641–644.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Knake, E. L. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) and rotational crop tolerance to chlorimuron, clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:77–80.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean (Glycine max) and rotational crop response to PPI chlorimuron, clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 8:224–230.Google Scholar
Loeppky, H. A., and Derksen, D. A. 1994. Quackgrass suppression through crop rotation in conservation tillage systems. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:193–197.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., and Reese, K. D. 1993. Effect of soil type and pH on persistence and carryover of imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:452–458.Google Scholar
Morton, C. A., and Harvey, R. G. 1992. Sweet corn (Zea mays) hybrid tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:91–96.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L., and Harvey, R. G. 1996. Control strategies for woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) in corn. J. Prod. Agric. 9:381–384.Google Scholar
Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin. Weed Sci. 36:625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, K. A., and Powell, G. E. 1992. Response of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown in rotation to clomazone, imazethapyr, bentazon, and acifluorfen. Weed Sci. 40:127–133.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1989. How a corn plant develops. Iowa State University Special Report Number 48.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M., 1992. Influence of tillage, crop rotation, and weed management on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) population dynamics and corn yield. Weed Sci. 40:645–653.Google Scholar
Tecle, B., Da Cunha, A., and Shaner, D. L. 1993. Differential routes of metabolism of imidazolinones: basis for soybean (Glycine max) selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 46:120–130.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and rotational crop response to imazethapyr in pea (Pisum sativum) and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 4:39–43.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. D., Defelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1993. Influence of tillage on soybean (Glycine max) herbicide carryover to grass and legume forage crops in Missouri. Weed Sci. 41:144–149.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics. 1995. Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics Service, P.O. Box 9160, Madison, WI 53715.Google Scholar