Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:38:23.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Kenaf to Selected Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark E. Kurtz  and
Samuel W. Neill
Mark E. Kurtz
Affiliation:
Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn., Delta Branch, Stoneville, MS 38776
Samuel W. Neill
Affiliation:
Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn., Delta Branch, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field trials conducted in 1989 and 1990, fifteen postemergence herbicides were tested for phytotoxicity to kenaf. Clethodim (110 g ai ha–1), fluazifop (220 g ai ha–1), quizalofop (70 g ai ha–1), and sethoxydim (210 g ai ha–1) were not phytotoxic to kenaf in the cotyledonary stage. MSMA (2.2 kg ha–1) was not phytotoxic to kenaf at the cotyledonary or 35-cm stage. All other herbicides applied postemergence to kenaf caused significant injury.

Keywords

Kenaf, Hibiscus cannabinus (L.) ‘Tainung 1’clethodim, (E,E)-(±)-2-[1-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onefluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidMSMA, monosodium salt of methylarsonic acidquizalofop, (±)-2-[4[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-oneHeight reductionkenaf tolerancephytotoxicity
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 125 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1989. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. John Wiley and Sons and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Publish. Corp. 6th ed. 2101, p. 7.Google Scholar
2. Bagby, M. O. 1989. Kenaf: the papermaking fiber (Abstract). Assoc. Adv. Ind. Crops. Proc., p. 1.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C., and Wilburn, J. H. 1968. Weed control methods for kinka oil, kenaf, and sunn crotalaria. Agron. J. 60:162–164.Google Scholar
4. Clark, T. F., and Wolff, I. A. 1965. TAPPI 48(6):381–384.Google Scholar
5. Dean, M. L., and Parker, C. 1971. The preemergence selectivity of some recently developed herbicides in jute, kenaf, and sesame, and their activity against Oxalis latifolia . Tech. Rep., A.R.C. Weed Res. Organ. No. 19, 24 p.Google Scholar
6. Fageiry, K. A. 1985. Chemical weed control in kenaf, Hibiscus cannabinus L. in Central Sudan. Trop. Pest Manage. 31:27–29.Google Scholar
7. Fageiry, K. A. 1978. Effect of some herbicides on weed control and yield of kenaf. Ann. Rep. of Kenana Res. Stn., Sudan.Google Scholar
8. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The Worlds Worst Weeds. Hawaii Univ. Press. 609 p.Google Scholar
9. Kurtz, M. E., and Neill, S. W. 1990. Kenaf tolerance to herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:32.Google Scholar
10. Kurtz, M. E., and Neill, S. W. 1990. Tolerance of kenaf to selected herbicides applied preemergence and postemergence. MAFES Info. Sheet 1325.Google Scholar
11. Kurtz, M. E., and Neill, S. W. 1991. Effects of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) competition on kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) yield. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:149.Google Scholar
12. Neill, S. W., and Kurtz, M. E. 1991. 1990 Kenaf variety trial. MAFES Info. Sheet 1330.Google Scholar
13. Trotter, W. K., and Corkern, R. S. 1967. Economics of kenaf for pulp in the South: A preliminary review. Conf. on Kenaf for Pulp. 1:13.Google Scholar
14. White, G. A., Cummires, D. G., Whiteley, E. L., Fike, W. T., Greig, J. K., Martin, J. A., Killinger, G. B., Higgins, J. J., and Clark, T. F. 1970. Cultural and harvesting methods for kenaf: an annual crop source of pulp in the Southeast. ARS, U.S. Dep. Agric. Production Res. Rep. 113.Google Scholar
15. Williams, J. H. 1966. Influence of row spacing and nitrogen levels on dry matter yields of kenaf. Agron. J. 58:166–168.Google Scholar