Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:08:28.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trifloxysulfuron–Insecticide Combination Effects on Broadleaf Weed and Thrips (Frankliniella spp.) Control in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Donnie K. Miller ,
Robert G. Downer ,
Eugene Burris ,
John W. Wilcut  and
Donald R. Cook
Donnie K. Miller*
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Robert G. Downer
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, LSU AgCenter, 161 Ag. Admin. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eugene Burris
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Donald R. Cook
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dmiller@agctr.lsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coapplication of herbicides and insecticides affords growers an opportunity to control multiple pests with one application given that efficacy is not compromised. Trifloxysulfuron was applied at 5.3 g ai/ha both alone and in combination with the insecticides acephate (370 g ai/ha), oxamyl (370 g ai/ha), lambda-cyhalothrin (34 g ai/ha), acetamiprid (45 g ai/ha), thiamethoxam (45 g ai/ha), endosulfan (379 g ai/ha), indoxacarb (123 g ai/ha), emamectin benzoate (11 g ai/ha), methoxyfenozide (67 g ai/ha), spinosad (75 g ai/ha), and pyridalyl (112 g ai/ha) to determine the effects of coapplication on control of some of the more common and/or troublesome broadleaf weeds infesting cotton. In addition, the insecticides acephate, oxamyl, lambda-cyhalothrin, thiamethoxam, and endosulfan, at the rates listed above, were applied either alone or in combination with trifloxysulfuron at 7.9 g/ha to assess the effects of coapplication on thrips control. Control of hemp sesbania (insecticides oxamyl and lambda-cyhalothrin), sicklepod (insecticides methoxyfenozide and pyridalyl), redroot pigweed (insecticides thiamethoxam, methoxyfenozide, spinosad, and pyridalyl), and smooth pigweed, Palmer amaranth, and common lambsquarters (all insecticides) with trifloxysulfuron may be reduced when coapplied with the indicated insecticides for each species. Control of pitted, tall, ivyleaf, and entireleaf morningglory with trifloxysulfuron was not affected by the insecticides evaluated. Coapplication of trifloxysulfuron with the insecticides evaluated also resulted in no negative effects on thrips control.

Keywords

Acephateacetamipridemamectin benzoateendosulfanindoxacarblambda-cyhalothrinmethoxyfenozidepyridalylspinosadthiamethoxamtrifloxysulfuroncommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DP448B’entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHGhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill # SEBEXivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHEPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmerii L. # AMAPApitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby # CASOBsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACHtall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHPBUthrips, Frankliniella sppHerbicide–insecticide combinationspesticide compatibilityDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 762 - 767
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of folira-applied CGA 362622 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), peanut (Arachis hypogea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 50:293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, R. D., Leonard, B. R., Burris, G., Stewart, S., Faircloth, J., Kelly, S., Pinnell-Alison, C., Erwin, T., Farris, M., and Micinski, S. 2003. Cotton insect control 2003. LCES Pub. 1083 5/2003 Rev. 5 p.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C. and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Weed management in cotton with CGA-362,622, fluometuron, and pyrithiobac. Weed Technol. 18:268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Porterfield, D. 2002. CGA 263622 antagonizes annual grass control with clethodim. Weed Technol. 16:749–754.Google Scholar
Burris, E., Pavloff, A. M., Leonard, B. R., Graves, J. B., and Church, G. 1990. Evaluation of two procedures for monitoring populations of early season insect pests (Thysanoptera: Thripidae and Homoptera: Aphididae) in cotton under selected management strategies. J. Econ. Entomol. 83:1064–1068.Google Scholar
Costello, R. W., Griffin, J. L., Leonard, B. R., and Miller, D. K. 1998. Staple and insecticide combinations: insect and weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:56.Google Scholar
Costello, R. W., Griffin, J. L., Leonard, B. R., Miller, D. K., and Church, G. E. 2005. Pyrithiobac/insecticide coapplication effects on cotton tolerance and weed and thrips control. Weed Technol. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, L. C., York, A. C., and Culpepper, A. S. 2003. CGA-362622 antagonizes annual grass control by graminicides in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 11:335–345.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, V. J. and Griffin, J. L. 1997. Weed control interactions associated with Roundup and insecticide mixtures. Proc. Beltwide Cotton conf. Pp. 799–800.Google Scholar
McElroy, J. S., Yelverton, F. H., Troxler, S. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2003. Selective exposure of yellow (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) to postemergence treatments of CGA-362622, imazaquin, and MSMA. Weed Technol. 17:554–559.Google Scholar
Pankey, J. H., Griffin, J. L., Leonard, B. R., Miller, D. K., Downer, R. G., and Costello, R. W. 2004. Glyphosate-insecticide combination effects on weed and insect control in cotton. Weed Technol. 18:698–703.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2002. Weed management with CGA-263622, fluometuron, and proemtryn in cotton. Weed Sci. 50:642–647.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., Wells, J. W., and Lewis, S. B. 2003. Weed management with CGA-362622 in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton. Weed Sci. 51:1002–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratchford, K. and Burris, E. 1985. Effects of early season pesticides in cotton. Louisiana Agriculture 28 (3):14–15.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Wilson, H. P., Armel, G. R., and Hines, T. E. 2003. Mixtures of CGA 362622 and bromoxynil for broadleaf weed control in bromoxynil-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 17:496–502.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Wilson, H. P., Armel, G. R., and Hines, T. E. 2004. Mixtures of glyphosate with CGA 362622 for weed control in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 18:16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troxler, S. C., Burke, I. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Smith, W. D. 2003. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar applied CGA-263622 in purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Sci. 51:13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:245–248.Google Scholar
Williams, M. R. 2004. Cotton insect losses 2003. Proc. Beltwide Cotton conf. Pp. 1249–1257.Google Scholar