Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:13:56.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Usda-Ars Pesticide Properties Database: A Consensus Data Set for Modelers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Albert E. Herner*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Environ. Chem. Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705

Abstract

The ARS Pesticide Properties Database (PPD) is a compendium of chemical and physical properties of a collection of widely used pesticides. At present, there are 92 compounds in the database and we have focused on 19 of the most important properties impacting on groundwater and atmospheric quality. The PPD relies upon experimentally determined data points. With the help of the National Agricultural Chemicals Association (NACA) we have been communicating directly with manufacturers to obtain the original experimental data with which they characterize pesticide properties and fulfill requirements for federal and state regulations. This provides the basis for the PPD which is augmented with data from the scientific literature. Features of the PPD are: 1. 19 parameters are provided for each pesticide. 2. References are given for all data. 3. When there are several values for a given property, all are cited. 4. All data have been verified and provide the latest, most reliable figures available.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, G. W. and White, J. L. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic compounds by soil colloids, with implications concerning biological activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12:324332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boesten, J.J.T.I. and Van der Pas, L.J.T. 1983. Test of some aspects of a model for the adsorption/desorption of herbicides in field soil. Aspects Appl. Biol. 4:496501.Google Scholar
3. British Crop Protection Council. 1991. Pesticide Manual, 9th Ed. British Crop Protection Council, Croydon, England. 695 p.Google Scholar
4. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Press. 1991. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference, 7th Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 2101 p.Google Scholar
5. Green, R. E. and Karickhoff, S. W. 1990. Sorption estimates for modeling in Cheng, H. H., ed., Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts and Modeling. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, p. 79101.Google Scholar
6. Hamaker, J. W. and Thompson, J. M. 1972. Adsorption in Goring, C.A.I. and Hamaker, J. W., eds., Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment, Vol. 1. Marcel Dekker Publ., New York, NY. p. 51143.Google Scholar
7. Hartley, G. S. and Graham-Bryce, I. J. 1980. Physical Principles of Pesticide Behavior (2 volumes). Academic Press, New York, NY. 1024 p.Google Scholar
8. Hill, B. D. and Schaalje, G. B. 1985. A two-compartment model for the dissipation of deltamethrin from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:10011009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mackay, D. and Paterson, S. 1981. Calculating fugacity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:10061014.Google Scholar
10. Meister Publishing Company. 1991. Farm Chemicals Handbook. Meister Publishing Company, Willoughby, OH. 770 p.Google Scholar
11. Royal Society of Chemistry. 1987. The Agrochemicals Handbook, 2nd Edition and updates dated April 1988, December 1988, June 1989, December 1989. Royal Society of Chemistry, Nottingham, England, 1181 p.Google Scholar
12. Spencer, W. F., Farmer, W. J., and Cliath, M. M. 1973. Pesticide volatilization. Residue Rev. 49:147.Google Scholar
13. Wauchope, R. D., Buttler, T. M., Hornsby, A. G., Augustijn-Beckers, P.W.M., and Burt, J. P. 1992. The SCS/ARS/CES Pesticide Properties Database for Environmental Decision-making. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 123:1155.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. Herbicide Handbook, 6th Ed., Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL. 301 p.Google Scholar