Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:16:25.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vegetation Management in the Cross Timbers: Response of Understory Vegetation to Herbicides and Burning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David M. Engle
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Jimmy F. Stritzke
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
F. Ted McCollum
Affiliation:
Dep. Anim. Sci., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078

Abstract

Understory vegetation was studied following treatment by herbicides and fire on grazed pastures within the Cross Timbers vegetation type. Tebuthiuron and triclopyr at 2.2 kg ha-1 were applied in March and June of 1983, respectively. The pastures were burned in late spring of 1985, 1986 and 1987. Frequency of horseweed, rosette panicgrass, and little bluestem increased with both herbicides, but the increase was usually larger with tebuthiuron than triclopyr. Burning as a follow-up to either herbicide had little effect on frequency of rosette panicgrass and little bluestem. Horseweed increased following burning in 1985 and 1987. Standing crop of grasses and forbs increased dramatically following herbicide treatments. Grass production was greater with tebuthiuron, whereas production of forbs and browse was generally greater with triclopyr.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. C., and Brown, L. E. 1986. Stability and instability in plant communities following fire. Am. J. Bot. 73:364368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 338 p.Google Scholar
3. Byrd, N. A., Lewis, C. E., and Pearson, H. A. 1984. Management of southern pine forest for cattle production. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Rep. R-8-GR4.Google Scholar
4. Conover, W. J., and Iman, R. 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am. Stat. 35:124129.Google Scholar
5. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the Western Cross Timbers. Ecol. Monogr. 18:327376.Google Scholar
6. Ehrenreich, J. H., and Crosby, J. S. 1960. Forage production on sprayed and burned areas in the Missouri Ozarks. J. Range Manage. 13:6870.Google Scholar
7. Elwell, H., McMurphy, W. E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1970. Burning and 2,4,5-T on post oak and blackjack oak rangeland in Oklahoma. Okla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull B-675.Google Scholar
8. Elwell, H., Santelmann, P. W., Stritzke, J. F., and Greer, H. 1974. Brush control research in Oklahoma. Okla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-712.Google Scholar
9. Engle, D. M. 1987. The Cross Timbers Experimental Range: Tomorrow's research today. p. 412 in Rollins, D. (ed.). Proc. of Brush Management in the Cross Timbers. Okla. Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. E-862.Google Scholar
10. Ewing, A. L., Stritzke, J. F., and Kulbeth, J. D. 1984. Vegetation of the Cross Timbers Experimental Range, Payne County, Oklahoma. Okla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. P-856.Google Scholar
11. Garrison, G. A., Bjugstad, A. J., Duncan, D. A., Lewis, M. E., and Smith, D. R. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. No. 475, U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. U.S. Govt. Printing Off., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
12. Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley. 359 p.Google Scholar
13. Grelen, H. E. 1978. Winter and spring prescribed fires on Louisiana pine-bluestem range. p. 242244 in: Hyder, D. N. (ed.). Int. Rangeland Congr. Proc. Google Scholar
14. Hyder, D. N., Bement, R. E., Remmenga, E. E., and Terwilliger, C. Jr. 1965. Frequency sampling of blue grama range. J. Range Manage. 18: 9094.Google Scholar
15. Milliken, G. A., and Johnson, D. E. 1984. Analysis of Messy Data. Lifetime Learning Publications. London.Google Scholar
16. Oosting, H. J. 1942. An ecological analysis of the plant communities of Piedmont, North Carolina. Am. Midl. Nat. 28:1126.Google Scholar
17. Penfound, W. T. 1968. Influence of a wildfire in the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma. Ecology 49:10031006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Scifres, C. J., and Mutz, J. L. 1978. Herbaceous vegetation changes following applications of tebuthiuron for brush control. J. Range Manage. 31:375378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Scifres, C. J., Stuth, J. W., Kirby, D. R., and Angell, R. F. 1981. Forage and livestock production following oak control with tebuthiuron. Weed Sci. 29:535538.Google Scholar
20. Scifres, C. J., Stuth, J. W., and Koerth, B. H. 1987. Improvement of oak-dominated rangeland with tebuthiuron and prescribed burning. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. B-1567.Google Scholar
21. Soil Conservation Service. 1981. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. No. 296. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
22. Steele, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 p.Google Scholar
23. Stritzke, J. F., McMurphy, W. E., and Hammond, R. W. 1975. Brush control with herbicides: Sarkey's research and development report. Okla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. MP-95.Google Scholar
24. Stritzke, J. F. 1980. Effect of tebuthiuron on herbage production in tallgrass prairies. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:114.Google Scholar
25. Stritzke, J. F., Engle, D. M., and McCollum, F. T. 1991. Vegetation management in the Cross Timbers: Response of woody species to herbicides and burning. Weed Tech. 5:400405.Google Scholar