Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:30:46.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Community Changes Following Diuron, Simazine, or Terbacil Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas J. Tworkoski ,
William V. Welker  and
George D. Vass
Thomas J. Tworkoski*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV 25430
William V. Welker
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV 25430
George D. Vass
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV 25430
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ttworkos@afrs.ars.usda.gov.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diuron, simazine, and terbacil were applied together or separately in the field each May from 1981 through 1996. Weed control was over 90% in 1981 and 1982, but by 1984 weeds increased in plots treated with diuron and simazine. Weed abundance was relatively low from 1981 through 1996 in plots treated with terbacil. Broadleaf and grass species abundance was similar in most herbicide-treated plots from 1992 through 1996. Perennial species, particularly fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and ailanthus (Ailanthus altissima), dominated sites treated with diuron and simazine. The weed community changed within 3 yr of the implementation of the weed management program that relied solely on herbicides. A relatively stable weed community persisted from 1992 through 1996. Repeated use of the combined high rate of diuron and low rate of terbacil provided excellent weed control for 15 yr.

Keywords

Diuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylureasimazine, 6-chloro-N,N′-diethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineterbacil, 5-chloro-3-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methyl-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedioneailanthus, Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle. # AILALtall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb. # FESARFruit orchardsselectionweed shiftscheatpoison ivyjohnsongrassyellow foxtail
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 197 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1993. Cropping history, tillage, and herbage effects on weed flora composition in irrigated corn. Agron. J. 85: 817–821.Google Scholar
Banwell, M. G. 1972. The role of herbicides in modern fruit management. In Proceedings of the 11th British Weed Control Conf. pp. 1002–1011.Google Scholar
Cussans, G. W. 1976. The influence of changing husbandry on weeds and weed control in arable crops. Proceedings of the 1976 British Crop Protection Conf.—Weeds. pp. 1001–1008.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L., Harrison, S. B., and Witt, H. L. 1994. Herbicide effects on weed control and shoot growth of young apple (Malus sylvestris) and peach (Prunus persica) trees. Weed Technol. 8: 840–848.Google Scholar
Holliday, R. J. and Putwain, P. D. 1980. Evolution of herbicide resistance in Senecio vulgaris: variation in susceptibility to simazine between and within populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 17: 779–791.Google Scholar
Jaccard, P. 1912. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 11: 37–50.Google Scholar
Mellenthin, W. M., Crabtree, G., and Rauch, F. D. 1966. Effects of herbicides and weed competition on growth of orchard trees. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 88: 121–126.Google Scholar
Mester, T. C. and Buhler, D. D. 1991. Effects of soil temperature, seed depth, and cyanazine on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seedling development. Weed Sci. 39: 204–209.Google Scholar
Patzold, S. and Brummer, G. 1997. Fate, sorption, and leaching of the herbicide diuron after annual application in an orchard soil (Orthic Luvisol). Z. Pflanzenernahr. Bodenk. 160: 165–170.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. and Weston, L. A. 1986. Adverse impacts of allelopathy in agricultural systems. In Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C., eds. The Science of Allelopathy. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20: 453–457.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. J., Welker, W. V., and Vass, G. D. 2000. Soil residues following repeat applications of diuron, simazine, and terbacil. Weed Technol. 14: 191–196.Google Scholar
Wang, R. L. and Dekker, J. 1995. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. III. Variation in herbicide resistance in Setaria spp. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 51: 99–116.Google Scholar