Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:59:49.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Control and Bermudagrass Tolerance to Imazapic Plus 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Beeville, TX 78102
Paul A. Baumann
Affiliation:
Texas Cooperative Extension, College Station, TX 77843-2472
Todd A. Baughman
Affiliation:
Texas Cooperative Extension, Vernon, TX 76384
Jason D. Nerada
Affiliation:
Pogue Agri Partners, Kenedy, TX
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: w-grichar@tamu.edu

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the 2000 and 2001 growing seasons to evaluate imazapic plus 2,4-D for weed control and bermudagrass tolerance. Imazapic at 140 g ai/ha plus 2,4-D at 280 g ai/ha or greater controlled dallisgrass at least 82% and provided at least 90% control of field sandbur, johnsongrass, and field mint. A mixed stand of Texas panicum and large crabgrass was controlled less than 75% and bahiagrass less than 25% with all rates of imazapic plus 2,4-D. Coastal bermudagrass injury was greater than 24% at three of four locations and Tifton 85 injury was greater than 50% at 3 wk after treatment with rates of imazapic plus 2,4-D as low as 70 plus 140 g/ha. Coastal bermudagrass yield was reduced at the first cutting with imazapic plus 2,4-D at 140 plus 210 g/ha and 240 plus 420 g/ha. Imazapic plus 2,4-D at 200 plus 350 g/ha reduced Tifton 85 forage production at the first two cuttings.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beran, D. D., Masters, R. A., and Gaussoin, R. E. 1999. Establishment of grassland legumes with imazethapyr and imazapic. Agron. J. 91:592596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, D. D., Masters, R. A., Gaussoin, R. E., and Rivas-Pantoja, F. 2000. Establishment of big bluestem and Illinois bundleflower mixtures with imazapic and imazethapyr. Agron. J. 92:460465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D. C., Murphy, T. R., and Grey, T. L. 2001. Bermudagrass response to Oasis. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:6465. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Dotray, P. A. and Keeling, J. W. 1997. Purple nutsedge control in peanuts as affected by imazameth and imazethapyr application timing. Peanut Sci. 24:113116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, M. F., Higginbottom, J. K., and McCarty, L. B. 2002. Annual weed control with Oasis (imazapic + 2,4-D). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:59. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. 1997. Control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:739743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Nester, P. R. 1997. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) contol in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222 and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 11:714719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutto, K. C., Coats, G. E., and Taylor, J. M. 2000. Evaluation of imazapic rate and tank-mixes for weed control on roadsides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:131. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Masters, R. A., Nissen, S. J., Gaussoin, R. E., Beran, D. D., and Stougaard, R. N. 1996. Imidazolinone herbicides improve restoration of Great Plains grasslands. Weed Technol. 10:392403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Influence of cultivation timing on weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with AC 263,233. Weed Technol. 8:760765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., Colvin, D. L., and Wiley, G. R. 1996. Weed management in southeastern peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 10:145152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. Toxicity of AC 263,222 to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Sci. 42:398402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wiley, G. L. 1995. AC 263,222 and imazethapyr rates and mixtures for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 9:801806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1988. Influence of imazapyr on the control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and johnsongrass (Sorghun halepense) with chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 36:663666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) control with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 3:9598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriquez, I. R., Higginbottom, J. K., and McCarty, L. B. 2002. Morphological responses of bahiagrass to Plateau (imazapic). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:46. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Sanders, D. E., Strahan, R. E., and Gentry, G. T. 2001. Weed control with Plateau (imazapic) and Oasis (imazapic + 2,4-D) in hybrid bermudagrass hay production. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:7475. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Tredaway-Ducar, J. A., Barnett, J. W. Jr, Mask, D. B., and Byrd, J. D. Jr. 2001. Oasis for pasture weed management in Florida and Mississippi. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:6667. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Warren, L. S. Jr, Yelverton, F. H., Gannon, T. W., and Hinton, J. D. 2002. Imazapic effects on quality and yield of bermudagrass hay. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:45. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1999. Response of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and imidazolinone-resistant corn (Zea mays) to AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 13:484488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G. L., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1996. Postemergence AC 263,222 systems for weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 44:615621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., Grichar, W. J., and Wehtje, G. R. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Pages 207244. in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., editors. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar