Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:21:21.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control with Fall and Early-Preplant Herbicide Applications in No-Till Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan F. Hasty ,
Christy L. Sprague  and
Aaron G. Hager
Ryan F. Hasty
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Christy L. Sprague*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Aaron G. Hager
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: sprague1@msu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during 1999 and 2000 to compare weed control after fall and early-preplant (EPP) herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Three residual treatments (chlorimuron plus metribuzin, chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone, and metribuzin) were applied at two rates and timings (fall and 30 d EPP) either alone or in combination with glyphosate and 2,4-D. The addition of glyphosate and 2,4-D to fall-applied residual herbicides significantly increased control of common chickweed, annual bluegrass, cressleaf groundsel, and shepherd's-purse. The effect of application rate on weed control was species dependent. Fall-applied residual herbicides were comparable with EPP treatments with respect to winter annual weed control; however, at planting control of summer annual weed species with fall treatments was less consistent compared with EPP residual herbicides.

Keywords

Chlorimuronglyphosatemetribuzinsulfentrazone2,4-D esterannual bluegrass, Poa annua L. #3 POAANcommon chickweed, Stellaria media L. Vill. # STEMEcressleaf groundsel, Senecio glabellus Poir. # SENGLshepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus # CAPBPsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrAMATAAMBELAMBTRCHEALfall appliedLAMAMLAMPUno tillresidual controlwinter annualsEPP, early preplant.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 887 - 892
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J 81:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conservation Technology Information Center. 2002. No-Till Gaining Ground: Results of Tillage System Usage Survey Released: Web page: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/CTIC.html. Accessed: December 20, 2002.Google Scholar
Dahlke, B. J., Hayden, T. A., Leif, J. W., and Medlin, C. R. 2001. Fall application of imazaquin plus glyphosate (premix) for winter annual weed control in soybeans. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:93.Google Scholar
Güeli, R. and Smeda, R. J. 2001. Soybean weed management with fall applied herbicides. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:98.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D., Loux, M. M., and Renner, K. A. 2001. Residual activity of fall-versus spring-applied herbicides in no-till soybeans in Michigan and Ohio. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:34.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Dobbels, A. F. 2001. Managing common chickweed and purple deadnettle with fall and early-spring herbicide treatments. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:31.Google Scholar
Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1985. Herbicide evaluations for no-till soybean (Glycine max) production in corn (Zea mays) residue. Weed Sci. 33:679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, C. V. and Kells, J. J. 1998. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) control in corn (Zea mays) with selective postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 12:631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8.1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Pp. 235–237.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. A., Johnson, W. G., Wait, J. D., Guttikonda, S. K., and Cordes, J. C. 2001. Fall applied herbicides for soybeans. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep 58:324–325.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L. and Hager, A. G. 2000. Fall-applied herbicides for winter annual weed control in soybean. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep 55:72–72.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B. G. and Krausz, R. F. 2001. Fall herbicide applications in corn and soybean. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 56:35.Google Scholar