Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:58:08.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management in Glyphosate- and Glufosinate-Resistant Sugar Beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nathan J. Kemp ,
Erin C. Taylor  and
Karen A. Renner
Nathan J. Kemp
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Erin C. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Karen A. Renner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: renner@msu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the critical period of weed interference in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant sugar beet, and to determine if PRE herbicides increased weed control or sugar beet root yield when glufosinate, glyphosate, or conventional POST herbicides were applied. Glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant sugar beet root yields were reduced by up to 66 and 67%, respectively, when weeds remained all season in the weedy control treatment compared with yields when weed removal occurred as soon as the weeds were 2.5 cm tall, approximately 2 to 3 wk after planting (WAP). A critical period of weed interference did not occur in this research. The critical time of weed removal was approximately 8 WAP in 1998 and beyond 11 WAP in 1999. Weeds averaged 20 cm in height at 8 WAP and weed densities were greater in 1998 compared with 1999. The critical weed-free period for glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant sugar beet was 4.5 to 5 WAP in 1998. In 1999, the critical weed-free period at the Michigan Sugar location was 1.5 WAP in glyphosate-resistant sugar beet, and 6.5 WAP in glufosinate-resistant sugar beet for the Michigan Sugar site. Glyphosate or glufosinate POST provided better weed control and resulted in greater sugar beet root yield compared with conventional POST herbicides when data were combined over PRE herbicide treatments. PRE herbicides improved the control of common lambsquarters and Amaranthus species in some of the site-years when data were combined over POST treatments, but sugar beet yield did not increase. Our research suggests that PRE herbicides will not be necessary in glyphosate- or glufosinate-resistant sugar beet. To avoid sugar beet yield loss, multiple POST applications of glyphosate or glufosinate will be needed until 6 to 9 WAP to prohibit yield loss from weeds emerging after the last POST application.

Keywords

Glufosinateglyphosatecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.pigweed, Amaranthus spp.sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. ‘HM RH3RR’, ‘Beta 891LL’Critical period of weed controlcycloateethofumesatepyrazontime of weed removalweed competitionweed thresholds
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 416 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alford, C. M., Miller, S. D., and Cecil, J. T. 2004. Using row spacing to increase crop competition with weeds. In Fischer, T., et al New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia. http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/poster/2/4/1/412_alfordcm.htm. Accessed: May 19, 2008.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. W., Harker, K. N., O'Donovan, J. T., Baig, M. N., and Kidnie, M. J. 2002. Glyphosate timing and tillage system effects on glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol 16:124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, T. M. and Renner, K. A. 2005. Timing of micro-rate applications based on growing degree days in sugarbeet. J. Sugar Beet Res 42:87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, T. M., Renner, K. A., and Kravchenko, A. N. 2006. Effect of herbicides on weed control and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) yield and quality. Weed Technol 20:150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalley, C. D., Kells, J. J., and Renner, K. A. 2004. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on corn and soybean yields. Weed Technol 18:165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, A. G. and Luecke, J. L. 1998. Special survey on micro-rate, 1998. Sugarbeet Res. Ext. Rep 29:64–75.Google Scholar
Dill, G. M. 2005. Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status, and future. Pest Manag. Sci 61:219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Lindquist, J. L., Shapiro, C. A., and Blankenship, E. E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci 51:408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everman, W. J., Clewis, S. B., Thomas, W. E., Burke, I. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2008. Critical period of weed interference in peanut. Weed Technol 22:63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., Harrison, S. K., Sprankle, P. L., Probst, N. J., Bauman, T. T., Bugg, W., Curran, W. S., Currie, R. S., Harvey, R. G., Johnson, W. G., Kells, J. J., Owen, M. D. K., Regehr, D. L., Slack, C. H., Spaur, M., Sprague, C. L., Vangessel, M., and Young, B. G. 2003. Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn: results of a 2-yr multistate study. Weed Technol 17:821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guza, C. J., Ransom, C. V., and Mallory-Smith, C. 2002. Weed control in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). J. Sugar Beet Res 39:109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 40:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, R. T. and Roberts, H. A. 1973. Effects of weed competition for different periods on the growth and yield of red beet. J. Hortic. Sci 48:281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kniss, A. R., Wilson, R. G., Martin, A. R., Burgener, P. A., and Feuz, D. M. 2004. Economic evaluation of glyphosate-resistant and conventional sugar beet. Weed Technol 18:388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)–velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci 44:309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesbah, A., Miller, S. D., Fornstrom, K. J., and Legg, D. E. 1994. Kochia (Kochia scoparia) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technol 8:754–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesbah, A., Miller, S. D., Fornstrom, K. J., and Legg, D. E. 1995. Wild mustard (Brassica kaber) and wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technol 9:49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgata, D. and Boerboom, C. 2000. Critical time of weed removal in glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci 48:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 1999. Cost-effective weed management in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate resistant soybean. J. Prod. Agric 12:460–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline-Smic, W. 2005. Technical performance of some commercial glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag. Sci 61:225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. 1981. Broadleaf interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci 29:128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. 1983. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci 31:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. and Lauridson, T. C. 1985. Powell amaranth (Amaranth powellii) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci 33:518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci 41:194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G., Yonts, C. D., and Smith, J. A. 2002. Influence of glyphosate and glufosinate on weed control and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) yield in herbicide-tolerant sugarbeet. Weed Technol 16:66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 2004. Weed–crop competition: A review. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing Professional. 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar