Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:24:55.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare) with Reduced Rates of Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric Spandl ,
Beverly R. Durgan  and
Douglas W. Miller
Eric Spandl
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St, Paul, MN 55108
Beverly R. Durgan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St, Paul, MN 55108
Douglas W. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St, Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenzoquat, imazamethabenz, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, and fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA were applied to four- to five-leaf wild oat at 1/2 ×, 3/4 ×, and 1 × rates. Wild oat response to herbicide rate and timing was similar in wheat and barley. Wild oat control with 1/2 × rates generally was less than that with 3/4 × rates, which was lower than or similar to that with 1 × rates. Wild oat biomass was often reduced less with 1/2 × rates than 1 × rates. However, reducing herbicide rates generally did not influence grain yields or net economic return. Grain yields and net economic return were generally greater in herbicide-treated plots than in the nontreated control.

Keywords

Diclofop, (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic aciddifenzoquat, 1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazoliumfenoxaprop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidMCPA, (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAbarley, Hordeum vulgare L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Herbicide application rateherbicide application timingdiclofopdifenzoquatfenoxapropimazamethabenzMCPAthifensulfurontribenuron2,4-DAVEFACOC, crop oil concentrateFDM, fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA (trade name—TILLER)FMTT, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron (trade name—CHEYENNE)NET, net economic returnSD, standard deviation.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 591 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barton, D. L., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992. Integrated wild oat (Avena fatua) management affects spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) yield and economics. Weed Technol. 6:129–135.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. and Strand, O. E. 1979. Survey of Wild Oat and Other Weeds in Small Grains in Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension Service. 254 p.Google Scholar
Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.Google Scholar
Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1974. The time of onset of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and spring cereals. Weed Res. 14:197–202.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., Holt, J. S., and Reints, J. S. 1989. Competitive interactions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oats (Avena fatua) grown at different densities. Weed Sci. 37:538–543.Google Scholar
Durgan, B. R., Gunsolus, J. L., Becker, R. L., and Dexter, A. G. 1996. Cultural and Chemical Weed Control in Field Crops. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension Serv. Bull. BU-3157-F. 76 p.Google Scholar
Evans, R. M., Thill, D. C., Tapia, L., Shafii, B., and Lish, J. M. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) density affect spring barley grain yield. Weed Technol. 5:33–39.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1984. Control of wild oats in wheat with barban, diclofop methyl, flamprop methyl, and difenzoquat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:1019–1021.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Mulder, C.E.G. 1982. Morphological and physiological variation in wild oat. Agron. J. 74:771–775.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1978. Difenzoquat for wild oat (Avena fatua) control. Weed. Sci. 26:571–576.Google Scholar
Morishita, D. W., Thill, D. C., and Hammel, J. E. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) interference in a greenhouse experiment. Weed Sci. 39:149–153.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. 1973. Wild oats infestations of field crops in 1973. North Dakota Farm Res. 31:3–5.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Chow, P.N.P. 1990. The influence of Agral 90 surfactant on the activity of imazamethabenz in wild oats (Avena fatua L.). Weed Res. 30:355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somody, C. N., Fay, P. K., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1979. The Wild Oats Pilot Project: A Summary. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University. 15 p.Google Scholar
Wille, M. J. and Thill, D. C. 1997. Wild oat (Avena fatua) density and imazamethabenz dose affects wild oat seed production. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:12.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Cousens, R., and Wright, K. J. 1990. The response of spring barley and winter wheat to Avena fatua population density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 116:601–609.Google Scholar