Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:10:35.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Winter Wheat Cultivar Characteristics Affect Annual Weed Suppression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gail A. Wicks*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, 461 West University Drive, North Platte, NE 69101
Paul T. Nordquist
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, 461 West University Drive, North Platte, NE 69101
P. Stephen Baenziger
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, 461 West University Drive, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Robert N. Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, 461 West University Drive, North Platte, NE 69101
Roger H. Hammons
Affiliation:
Nebraska Crop Improvement Association, 528 Oregon Trail, Lincoln, NE 68521-3247
John E. Watkins
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: gwicks1@unl.edu

Abstract

Thirteen hard red winter wheat cultivars were evaluated for their ability to suppress summer annual weeds in grain production systems near North Platte, NE, from 1993 through 1997. ‘Turkey’, a 125-yr-old landrace selection, suppressed both broadleaf and grass weeds more than other cultivars. Some relatively new cultivars, such as ‘Arapahoe’, ‘Jules’, ‘Pronghorn’, and ‘Vista’ suppressed summer annual grasses almost as well as Turkey. Total weed density was negatively correlated with number of winter wheat stems/m2, mature winter wheat height, and lodging. Weed density after wheat harvest was positively correlated with delay in winter wheat seeding date and was negatively correlated with precipitation 0 to 30 d after winter wheat seeding, during tillering, tillering to boot stage, and heading to maturity stage. Mean air temperature 0 to 30 d after wheat seeding was positively correlated with weed density. In the spring, weed density was positively correlated with temperatures during the tillering stage, tillering to boot stage, and heading to maturity stage. Stinkgrass and witchgrass densities were positively correlated with severity of wheat leaf rust. The highest grain-producing cultivars included three medium height cultivars ‘Alliance’, Arapahoe, and ‘Niobrara’. Alliance wheat produced 53% more grain than Turkey, and the other two produced 43% more grain.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. 1994. Characterizing weed community seedling emergence for a semiarid site in Colorado. Weed Technol. 8:245249.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Differential competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars against downy brome. Agron. J 86:649654.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., and Sturko, A. R. W. 1981. Effect of seeding dates and densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the growth and productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29:212217.Google Scholar
Briggle, L. W. and Reitz, L. R. 1963. Classification of Triticum Species and Wheat Varieties Grown in the United States. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Technical Bull. 1278.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Carlson, D. R. 1980. Control of weeds in an oat (Avena sativa)-soybean (Glycine max) ecofallow rotation. Weed Sci. 28:4650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challaiah, O. C Burnside, Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., and Hall, A. E. 1991. Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations on light interference and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 39:175179.Google Scholar
Granstaff, E. L. and Enix, J. R. 1956. Wheat Varieties Commercially Important in the HRW Area. E.C. 56114. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Extension Service and U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Holt, J. 1995. Plant response to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci. 43:474482.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. P., Peeper, T. F., and Krenzer, E. G. 1999. Wheat cultivar characteristics affect competitive ability with grassy weeds. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:62.Google Scholar
Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., and Martin, P. 1996. Breeding wheat cultivars more competitive against weeds. in Brown, H., Cussans, G. W., Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., Fernandex-Quintanilla, C., Helweg, A., Labrada, R. E., Landes, M., Kudsk, P., and Streibig, J. C., eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Congress; Copenhagen, Denmark. Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology. Pp. 13231324.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L. and Mortensen, D. A. 1998. Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppression ability of two old and two new modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci. 46:569574.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppression ability. Agron. J 90:787792.Google Scholar
Montgomery, E. G. 1912. Competition in Cereals. Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station Bull. 133.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Seefeldt, S. S. 1999. Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 47:7480.Google Scholar
Pallesen, J. E. and Lauge, H. H. 1941. Seasonal Distribution of Rainfall in Relation to Yield of Winter Wheat. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Technical Bull. 761.Google Scholar
Pareja, M. R., Staniforth, D. H., and Pareja, G. P. 1985. Distribution of weed seed among different crop structure units. Weed Sci. 33:182189.Google Scholar
Ramsel, R. E. and Wicks, G. A. 1988. Use of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and herbicides in aiding weed control in an ecofallow corn (Zea mays) rotation. Weed Sci. 36:394398.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. SAS System Windows: Release 6.12. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 955 p.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. E., Doupnik, B. Jr., Elmore, R. W., and Klein, R. N. 1994. Leaf rust severity on winter wheat cultivars at three Nebraska locations, 1993. Biol. Cult. Tests 9:126.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. E., Rutledge, S. S., and Baenziger, P. S. 1995. Virulence patterns of Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici in Nebraska during 1992 and 1993. Plant Dis 79:467470.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Hanson, G. E. 1995. Effect of rainfall on glyphosate plus 2,4-D performance on Echinochloa crus-galli . Weed Sci. 43:666670.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Nordquist, P. T., Hanson, G. E., and Schmidt, J. W. 1994. Influence of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars on weed control in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 42:2734.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Popken, D. H., and Lowry, S. R. 1989. Survey of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) stubble fields sprayed with herbicides after harvest in 1986. Weed Technol. 3:244254.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Ramsel, R. E., Nordquist, P. T., Schmidt, J. W., and Challaiah, . 1986. Impact of wheat cultivars on establishment and suppression of summer annual weeds. Agron. J 78:5962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, R. D. and Warren, G. F. 1975. Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci. 23:317323.Google Scholar
Williams, C. F., Crabtree, G., Mack, H. J., and Laws, W. D. 1973. Effect of spacing on weed competition in sweet corn, snap beans and onions. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci 98:526529.Google Scholar