Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T03:00:31.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of 2,4–D Sprays on the Growth of Young Sugar Cane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John R. Havis
John R. Havis*
Affiliation:
Inter-American Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Turrialba, Costa Rica
Get access

Extract

Sugar cane appears to be suitable for the use of 2,4–D sprays for selective weed control. According to Young (1952) this is a regular commercial practice on some of the large plantations in Puerto Rico. The operators of certain plantations in Peru have found the application of 2,4–D to be economically practicable for broad-leaved weed control. Best and Gibbens (1951) have reported the value of 2,4–D sprays for sugar cane in Louisiana.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 148 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © 1953 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Best, J. C., and Gibbens, R. T. Jr. 1951. Commercial use of chemicals in sugar cane for the control of Johnson grass. Southern Weed Conference Proc. 4: 40–41.Google Scholar
Nolla, J. A. B. 1950. Injury to sugar cane from 2,4–D. International Soc. Sugar Cane Tech. Proc. 1950. pp. 178–189.Google Scholar
van Dillewijn, C. 1952. Botany of sugar cane. The Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Mass. pp. 97–161.Google Scholar
van Overbeek, J. 1947. Use of synthetic hormones as weed killers in tropical agriculture. Econ. Bot. 1: 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, P. D. 1952. (Personal correspondence) Central Aguirre Sugar Company, Aguirre, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar