Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T08:21:48.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of Several Chemicals for Weed Control in Easter Lilies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. A. Gentner ,
W. C. Shaw  and
F. F. Smith
W. A. Gentner
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
W. C. Shaw
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
F. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Get access

Extract

The gross annual wholesale value of Easter lilies and other ornamental bulb crops grown in the United States in 1950 was estimated at 9.2 million dollars. Because of the high per-acre value of these crops, intensive management is practiced in an effort to produce maximum yields of high quality flowers and bulbs at minimum costs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1958 , pp. 203 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crossley, J. H., and Adamson, R. M. Chemical weed control in bulb crops at Saanichton. Proc. Bulb Growers' Short Course p. 43–46. 1956.Google Scholar
2. Davis, D. E. Some factors that affect the phytotoxicity of water-soluble DNBP. Weeds 3:227–234. 1956.Google Scholar
3. Davis, F. L., Selman, F. L., and Davis, D. E. Some factors affecting the behavior of dinitro herbicides in soils. Proc. Southern Weed Conf. pp. 205–207. 1954.Google Scholar
4. Meggitt, W. F. Factors affecting the herbicidal action of 4,6–dinitro–ortho–secondary butyl phenol. Ph.D. Thesis, Rutgers University Library, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 1956.Google Scholar
5. Peabody, D. V. Preliminary investigations of chemical weed control in bulb crops. Proc. Bulb Growers' Short Course p. 39–40. 1953.Google Scholar
6. Peabody, D. V. Weed control in bulbs in Washington. Proc. Bulb Growers' Short Course p. 41–42. 1956.Google Scholar
7. Shaw, W. C., and Swanson, C. R. Techniques and equipment used in evaluating chemicals for their herbicidal properties. Weeds 1:352–365. 1952.Google Scholar
8. Swanson, C. R., Shaw, W. C., and Hughes, J. H. Some effects of isopropyl N–(3–chlorophenyl)carbamate and an alkanolamine salt of dinitro ortho secondary butyl phenol on germinating cotton seeds. Weeds 2:178–189. 1953.Google Scholar