Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:43:45.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ahemeral light cycles and egg quality*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

M.M. Shanawany
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, King Saud University, PO Box 1482, Burydah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
Get access

Abstract

The literature concerning the influence of ahemeral light cycles on the quality of eggs is reviewed. Results pooled from published reports were used to arrive at a quantitative relationship between the length of light cycle (ranging from 23 h to 30 h) and the parameters of egg quality. Eggshell quality (whether measured as mg shell per unit surface area, as shell thickness or as shell weight per se) was found to depend on a curvilinear function of cycle length. Albumen height was negatively correlated with cycle length, whereas yolk and albumen weights were found to have a curvilinear relationship with cycle length.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arafa, A.S., Harms, R.H., Miles, R.D., Christmas, R.B. and Choi, J.H. (1982) Quality characteristics of eggs from different strains of hens as related to time of oviposition. Poultry Science 61: 842847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, L.R. (1945) The relationship of clutch position and time interval between eggs to eggshell quality. Poultry Science 24: 555563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, B.M. and Morris, T.R. (1978) Entrainment of oviposition in the fowl using light-dark cycles. British Poultry Science 19: 33340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatti, B.M. and Morris, T.R. (1988) Model for the prediction of mean time of oviposition for hens kept in different light and dark cycles. British Poultry Science 29: 205213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biellier, H.V. and Ostmann, O.W. (1960) Effect of varying day-length on time of oviposition in domestic fowl. Research Bulletin Missouri Agricultural Experimental Station: 747Google Scholar
Bradfield, J.R.E. (1951) Radiographic studies on the formation of the hen's eggshell. Journal of Experimental Biology 28: 125140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmester, B.R., Scott, H.M. and Card, L.E. (1939) Rate of eggshell formation in the hen. Proceedings of the 7th World's Poultry CongressCleveland, USA, pp. 99101Google Scholar
Choi, J.H., Miles, R.D., Arafa, A.S. and Harms, R.H. (1981) The influence of oviposition time on egg weight, shell quality and blood phosphorus. Poultry Science 60: 824828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.B. and Barnett, B.D. (1976) Ahemeral photoperiods for chicken hens. Poultry Science 55: 11831187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, M., Roland, D.A. Sr. and Clark, A.J. (1986) Influence of time of calcium intake on bone and dietary calcium utilization. Poultry Science 65: 555558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S., Morris, T.R. and Jennings, R.C. (1971) The use of non-24-hour cycles to manipulate egg weight in pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 27: 159Google Scholar
Koelkebeck, K.W. and Biellier, H.V. (1986) Effect of ahemeral light-dark cycles on production and egg quality of laying hens. Poultry Science 65: 874880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1985) Early application of conventional or ahemeral photoperiods in an attempt to improve egg size. Poultry Science 64: 20202026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1988) Significance of growing photoperiods and light stimulation at various ages for leghorn pullets subjected to regular or ahemeral photoperiods. Poultry Science 67: 391398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeson, S., Summers, J.D. and Etches, R.J. (1979) Effect of a 28-h light-dark cycle on egg shell quality and end-of-lay birds. Poultry Science 58: 285287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melek, O., Morris, T.R. and Jennings, R.C. (1973) The time factor in egg formation for hens exposed to ahemeral light-dark cycles. British Poultry Science 14: 493498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mongin, P. and Sauveur, B. (1970) Composition du fluide uterin et de l'albumen durant le sejour de l'oeuf dans l'uterus chez la poule domestique. Compte Rendu Academie Science, Paris, 270D: 17151718Google Scholar
Morris, T.R. (1973) The effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production. Poultry Science 52: 423445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R. (1978a) The photoperiodic effect of ahemeral light-dark cycles which entrain circadian rhythms. British Poultry Science 19: 207212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R. (1978b) The influence of light on ovulation in domestic birds. In: Animal Reproduction (BARC Symposium in Agriculture Research), Wiley, New York, USA, pp. 307322Google Scholar
Morris, T.R., Melek, O. and Cunningham, F.J. (1975) Luteinizing hormone concentrations in the plasma of laying hens exposed to a 27-h cycle of light and darkness. Journal of Reproductive Fertility 42: 381384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J.O. (1982) Shell quality of eggs from hens exposed to 26- and 27-h light-dark cycles from 56 to 76 weeks of age. Poultry Science 61: 804812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J.O. and Ousterhout, L.E. (1983) Ahemeral light cycles and protein levels for older laying hens. Poultry Science 62: 525531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nys, Y. (1986) Relationship between age, shell quality and individual rate and duration of shell formation in domestic hens. British Poultry Science 27: 253259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, F.G. (1980) The effects of dietary protein levels, ahemeral light and dark cycles and intermittent photoperiods on the performance of chicken broiler parent genotypes. Poultry Science 59: 12581268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, D.A. Sr. (1981) Relation of interval between eggs and time of oviposition to egg shell quality. Poultry Science 60: 10661070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, D.A. Sr. and Harms, R.H. (1974) Specific gravity of eggs in relation to egg weight and time of oviposition. Poultry Science 53: 14941498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, D.A. Sr.Sloan, D.R. and Harms, R.H. (1973) Calcium metabolism in the laying hen: 6. Shell quality in relation to time of oviposition. Poultry Science 52: 506510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosales, A.A., Biellier, H.V. and Stephenson, A.B. (1968) Effect of light cycles on ovipositions and egg production. Poultry Science 47: 586591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1981a) Sexual maturity and subsequent performance in the female domestic fowl. PhD Thesis, University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1981b) Ahemeral light cycles: An easy way to obtain an increase in egg size. West of Scotland Agricultural College, Technical Note 146Google Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1982a) The effect of ahemeral light and dark cycles on the performance of laying pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 38: 120126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1982b) How does a 28-hour cycle affect the laying hen. The Egg Producers Conference3 MarchScotland, UKGoogle Scholar
Talbot, C.J. and Tayler, C.A. (1974) A study of the progressive deposition of shell gland of the domestic fowl. British Poultry Science 15: 217224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, D.C. and Scott, H.M. (1935) The time factor in egg formation. Poultry Science 14: 195207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, K.W. and Potts, P.L. (1975) Effect of strain and age on the relationship of oviposition time to shell strength. British Poultry Science 16: 599606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S.C. and Cunningham, F.J. (1984) Endocrine control of ovulation cycle. In: Reproductive Biology of Poultry (Eds. Cunningham, F.J., Lake, P.E. and Hewitt, D.), British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh, UK, pp. 2951Google Scholar
Yannakopoulos, A.L. and Morris, T.R. (1979) Effect of light, Vitamin D and dietary phosphorus on egg-shell quality late in the pullet laying year. British Poultry Science 20: 337342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yannakopoulos, A.L. and Tserven-Gousi, A.S. (1986) Egg shell quality as influenced by 18-day beak trimming and time of oviposition. Poultry Science 65: 398400CrossRefGoogle Scholar