Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:54:36.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applications of biotechnology in the poultry industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

D.W. Burt
Affiliation:
Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, United Kingdom, e-mail: dave.burt@bbsrc.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Progress in the selection of production traits in the poultry industry has been dramatic over the past 75 years. Genetic progress has its biological limits and these may be reached in the next 20 years. The poultry industry will need to adapt with more emphasis on the needs of the consumer (e.g. product quality, health and animal welfare), as well as the needs of the breeders/producers (e.g. lower feed costs and higher fertility). These new traits are difficult and costly to measure by conventional genetic selection methods - the application of genomics is a possible solution. Poultry genomics has benefited from the rapid technological advances in the genetics of model organisms and human. A number of resources and approaches are now well established, including genetic markers and maps (both genetic and physical), QTL mapping, comparative mapping, EST and BAC resources. In addition, the next phase of gene discovery - Functional Genomics is underway. How the poultry industry can benefit and get access to these new technologies is discussed.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albers, G.A.A. (1998) Future trends in poultry breeding. World Poultry 14: 4250.Google Scholar
Bentley, J. (1997) Exploring the turkey genome. BUT Newsetter, Autumn.Google Scholar
Brown, P.O. and Botstein, D. (1999) Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nature Genetics 21: 3337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, D.W. and Cheng, H.H. (1998) Chicken Gene Maps. ILAR Journal 39: 229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, D.W., Bruley, C.K., Dunn, I., Jones, C.T., Ramage, A., Law, A.S., Morrice, D.R., Paton, I.R., Smith, J., Windsor, D., Sazanov, A., Fries, R. and Waddington, D. (1999) Dynamics of chromosome evolution: clues from comparative gene mapping in birds and mammals. Nature 402: 411413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Vrebalov, J., Dijkhof, R.J.M., Van Der Poel, J.J. and Groenen, M.A.M. (2000) Two-dimensional screening of the Wageningen chicken BAC library. Mammalian Genome 11: 360363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferber, D. (2000) Superbugs on the hoof? Science 288: 792794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georges, M. and Andersson, L. (1996) Livestock genomics comes of age. Genome Research 6: 907921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerhold, D. and Caskey, C.T. (1996) It's the genes! EST access to human genome content. BioEssays 18: 973981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groenen, M.A.M., Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Veenendaal, T., Van Kaam, J.B.C.H.M., Vereijken, A.L.J., Van Arendonk, J.A.M. and Van Der Poel, J.J. (1997) QTL mapping in chicken using a three generation full sib family structure of an extreme broiler x broiler cross. Animal Biotechnology 8: 4146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillel, J. (1997) Map-based quantitative trait locus identification. Poultry Science 76: 11151120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E.S. and Weinberg, R.A. (2000) Genomics: journey to the center of biology. Science 287: 17771782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, E.S. and Kruglyak, L. (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpretating and reporting linkage results. Nature Genetics 11: 241247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, A.S. and Archibald, A.L. (2000) Farm animal genome databases. Briefings in Bioinformatics 1: 151160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morisson, M., Pitel, F., Fillon, V., Pouzadoux, A., Berge, R., Vit, J.P., Zoorob, R., Auffray, C., Gellin, J. and Vignal, A. (1998) Integration of chicken cytogenetic and genetic maps: 18 new polymorphic markers isolated from BAC and PAC clones. Animal Genetics 29: 348–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, M., Nanda, I., Guttenbach, M., Steinlein, C., Hoehn, H., Schartl, M., Haaf, T., Weigend, S., Fries, R., Buerstedde, J.M., Wimmers, K., Burt, D.W., Smith, J., A'hara, S., Law, A., Griffin, D.K., Bumstead, N., Kaufman, J., Thomson, P.A., Burke, T.A., Groenen, M.A.M., Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Vignal, A., Fillon, V., Morisson, M., Pitel, F., Tixier-Boichard, M., Ladjali-Mohammedi, K., Hillel, J., Mäki-Tanila, A., Cheng, H.H., Delany, M.E., Burnside, J. and Mizuno, S. (2000) First report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2000. Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 94: 169218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Paton, I.R., Bruley, C.K., Windsor, D., Burke, D., Ponce De Leon, F.A., Burt, D.W. (2000 a) Integration of the physical and genetic maps of the chicken macrochromsomes (Gallus gallus) and orientation of linkage groups. Animal Genetics 31: 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Bruley, c.k., Paton, I.R., Dunn, I., Jones, C.T., Windsor, D., Morrice, D.R., Law, A.S., Masabanda, J., Sazanov, A., Waddington, D., Fries, R. and Burt, D.W. (2000 b.) Differences in gene density on chicken macrochromosomes and microchromosomes. Animal Genetics 31: 96103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelman, R.J., Bovenhuis, H. (1998) Moving from QTL experimental results to the utilization of QTL in breeding programmes. Animal Genetics 29: 7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trewavas, A. (1999)Much food, many problems. Nature 402: 231232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddington, D., Springbett, A.J. and Burt, D.W. (2000) A chromosome based model to estimate the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps. Genetics 154: 323332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonash, N., Bacon, L.D., Witter, R.L. and Cheng, H.H. (1999) High resolution mapping and identification of new quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting susceptibility to Marek's disease. Animal Genetics 30: 126135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoorob, R., Billault, A., Severac, V., Fillon, V., Vignal, A. and Auffray, C. (1996) Two chicken genomic libraries in the PAC and BAC cloning systems: Organization and characterization. Animal Genetics 27 (suppl 2):69.Google Scholar