Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:42:33.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary NSP nutrition and intestinal immune system for broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

Y.M. BAO*
Affiliation:
Alltech Asia-Pacific Biosciences Centre, Pathumthani,12120 Thailand
M. CHOCT
Affiliation:
Australia Poultry Cooperative Research Centre, Armidale, 2351 NSW Australia
*
Corresponding author: ybao@alltech.com
Get access

Abstract

Currently broiler chickens are genetically selected for improved feed conversion ratio and rapid growth rate. This rapid growth rate is generally based on a high rate of feed intake and not due to an increased nutrient digestibility. Increased body weight gain, in turn, is found to be negatively correlated with antibody response (total antibody response and specific anti-sheep red blood cell (SRBC)) in broilers. The interactions between commensal bacteria and GALT immune systems are considered to be the basic mechanism of the host against invading pathogens; achieved by forming bio films and by binding to the intestinal epithelium and therefore effectively blocking the sites from pathogens. Apart from the fact that NSP may shift microbial populations toward beneficial micro-organisms to stimulate the immune system, recent evidence has assumed that exogenous xylanase majorly degraded NSP to oligosaccharides and released more phenolics to act as anti-oxidants. Furthermore, it has been suggested that the dietary fibre anti-oxidants existing in insoluble NSP may actually quench the soluble radicals that are continuously formed in intestinal tracts. During the first week post-hatch, the intestinal immune system may be developed by colonization with beneficial bacteria and enhanced competition with invading pathogens. NSP and associate substrates might not only provide substrates for beneficial bacteria but play an important part in removing free radicals.

Type
Small-scale Family Poultry Production
Copyright
World's Poultry Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADAMS, C.A. (2006) Nutrition-based health in animal production. Nutrition Research Reviews 19: 79-89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ANGLEN, C.S., TRUCKENMILLER, M.E., SCHELL, T.D. and BONNEAU, R.H. (2003) The dual role of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the development of stress-induced herpes simplex encephalitis. Journal of Neuroimmunology 140: 13-27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
APAJALAHTI, A., KETLUNEN, A. and GRAHAM, H. (2004) Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 223-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAO, Y.M. (2009) Personal communication.Google Scholar
BAR-SHIRA, E. and FRIEDMAN, A. (2005) Ontogeny of gut associated immune competence in the chick. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 60: 42-50.Google Scholar
BAR-SHIRA, E., SKLAN, D. and FRIEDMAN, A. (2005) Impaired immune responses in broiler hatchling hindgut following delayed access to feed. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 105, 33-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BEDFORD, M.R. and APAJALAHTI, J. (2004) Microbial interactions in the response to exogenous enzyme utilisation, in: BEDFORD, M.R. & PARTRIDGE, G.C. (Eds) Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition, pp. 299-314 (CABI Publishing, UK).Google Scholar
BRISBIN, J.T., GONG, J.H. and SHARIF, S. (2008) Interactions between commensal bacteria and the gut-associated immune system of the chicken Animal Health Research Review 9: 101-110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHOCT, M. (1997) Feed non-starch polysaccharides: chemical and nutritional significance. Feed Milling International June: 13-26.Google Scholar
CHOCT, M. (2001) Enzyme supplementation of poultry diets based on viscous cereals, in: BEDFORD, M.R. & PARTRIDGE, G.C. (Eds) Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition, pp. 145-160 (Wiltshire, UK: CABI Publishing).Google Scholar
CHOCT, M. (2006) Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. World's Poultry Science Journal 62: 5-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHOCT, M. (2009) Managing gut health through nutrition. British Poultry Science 50: 9-15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COSTANTINI, D. and MØLER, A.P. (2009) Does immune response cause oxidative stress in birds? A meta-analysis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 153: 339-344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DIBNER, J.J., KITCHELL, M.L., ATWELL, C.A. and IVEY, F.J. (1996) The Effect of Dietary Ingredients and Age on the Microscopic Structure of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 5: 70-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIBNER, J.J., KNIGHT, C.D., KITCHELL, M.L., ATWELL, C.A., DOWNS, A.C. and IVEY, F.J. (1998) Early Feeding and Development of the Immune System in Neonatal Poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 7: 425-436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENGBERG, R.M., HEDEMANN, M.S., STEENFELDT, S. and JENSEN, B.B. (2004) Influence of whole wheat and xylanase on broiler performance and microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract. Poultry Science 83: 925-938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FORCHIELLI, M.L. and WALKER, W.A. (2005) The role of gut associated lymphoid tissues and mucucosal defence British Journal of Nutrition 93: S41-S48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GONZALEŹ-ALVARADO, J.M., JIMENEZ-MORENO, E. and MATEOS, G.G. (2007) Effect of type of cereal, heat processing of cereal, and inclusion of fiber in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers. Poultry Science 86: 1705-1715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HEGDE, S., KAVITHA, S., VARADARAJ, M.C. and MURALIKRISHNA, G. (2006) Degradation of cereal bran polysaccharide-phenolic acid complexes by Aspergillus niger CFR 1105. Food Chemistry 96: 14-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HETLAND, H., SVIHUS, B. and KROGDAHL, A. (2003) Effects of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. British Poultry Science 44: 275-82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HINCHA, D.K., LIVINGSTONLII, D.P., PREMAKUMAR, R., ZUTHER, E., OBEL, N., CACELA, C. and HEYER, A.G. (2007) Fructans from oat and rye: Composition and effects on membrane stability during drying. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1768: 1611-1619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUGHES, D.A. (1999) Effects of dietary antioxidants on the immune function of middle-aged adults. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58: 79-84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JANEWAY, C.A. Jr., TRAVERS, P., WALPORT, M. and SHLOMCHIK, M.J. (2005) An introduction to immunobiology and innate immunity, in: Immunobiology: The immune system in health and disease, pp. 1-35 (New York: Garland Science Publishing).Google Scholar
JÓZEFIAK, D., RUTKOWSKI, A., JENSEN, B. and ENGBERG, R. (2007) Effects of dietary inclusion of triticale, rye and wheat and xylanase supplementation on growth performance of broiler chickens and fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract. Animal Feed Sciences and Technology 132: 79-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KIM K.H., , TSAO, R., YANG, R. and CUI, S.W. (2006) Phenolic acid profiles and antioxidant activities of wheat bran extracts and the effect of hydrolysis conditions. Food Chemistry 95: 466-473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLASING, K.C. (2007) Nutrition and the immune system. British Poultry Science 48: 525-537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KOENEN, M.E., BOONSTRA-BlOM, A.G. and JEURISSEN, S.H.M. (2002) Immunological differences between layer- and broiler-type chickens. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 89: 47-56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KOGUT, M.H. (2009) Impact of nutrition on the innate immune response to infection in poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 111-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOGUT, M.H. and KLASING, K. (2009) An immunologist's perspective on nutrition, immunity, and infectious diseases: Introduction and overview. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 103-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KORVER, D.R. (2006) Overview of the Immune Dynamics of the Digestive System. Journal of Applied poultry Research 15: 123-135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIEBLER-TENORIO, E.M. and PABST, R. (2006) MALT structure and function in farm animals. Veterinary Research 37: 257-280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAIORKA, A., DAHLKE, F. and MORGULIS, M.S.F. De A. (2006) Broiler adaptation to post-hatching period. Ciéncia Rural 36: 701-708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAUW, W.M., KANIS, E., NOORDHUIZEN-STASSEN, E.N. and GROMMERS, F.J. (1998) Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56: 15-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAKATA, T. (1987) Stimulatory effect of short-chain fatty acids on epithelial cell proliferation in the rat intestine: a possible explanation for trophic effects of fermentable fibre, gut microbes and luminal trophic factors. British Journal of Nutrition 58: 95-103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SANTOS, F.B.O., SHELDON, B.W., SANTOS, A.A. Jr. and FERKET, P.R. (2008) Influence of Housing System, Grain Type, and Particle Size on Salmonella Colonization and Shedding of Broilers Fed Triticale or Corn-Soybean Meal Diets. Poultry Science 87: 405-420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SKLAN, D. (2005) Development of defense mechanisms in the digestive tract of the chick. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14: 437-443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STODOLAK, B., STARZYNSKA, A., CZYSZCZON, M. and ZYLA, K. (2007) The effect of phytic acid on oxidative stability of raw and cooked meat. Food Chemistry 101: 1041-1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TOROK, V.A., HUGHES, R.J., OPHEL-KELLER, K., ALI, M. and MACLPINE, R. (2009) Influence of different litter materials on cecal microbiota colonization in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 88: 2474-81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VITAGLIONE, P., NAPOLITANO, A. and FOGLIANO, V. (2008) Cereal dietary fibre: a natural functional ingredient to deliver phenolic compounds into the gut. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19: 451-463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar