Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:33:56.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of relative humidity and turning in incubators machines on the incubation yield and chick performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2013

V.M. BARBOSA*
Affiliation:
INCT-Pecuária, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
J.S.R. ROCHA
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
M.A. POMPEU
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
N.R.S. MARTINS
Affiliation:
INCT-Pecuária, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
N.C. BAIÃO
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
L.J.C. LARA
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
J.V.M.S.P. BATISTA
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
R.C. LEITE
Affiliation:
INCT-Pecuária, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: vmichalsky@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Due to the high demands and production costs of the poultry industry it is imperative to study alternatives to modify the practice of incubation in order to maximise productivity by ensuring the conditions necessary for the development of embryos of current strains. Such changes in the management of incubation cannot affect the quality of chicks and broiler performance during early growth. To achieve these goals, several factors that work together during artificial incubation should be considered, for example, the relative humidity and turning machine incubators. Some research has already been conducted to define the optimum for these factors. This article reviews the results of studies where relative humidity and use of turning systems in incubators and their impact on incubation yield and chick performance were examined.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAGGOTT, G.K., DEEMING, D.C. and LATTER, G.V. (2002) Electrolyte and water balance of the early avian embryo: Effects of egg turning. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 13: 105-119.Google Scholar
BARBOSA, V.M. (2005) Efeitos da umidade relativa do ar na incubadora e da idade da matriz leve sobre o rendimento da incubação e desempenho da progênie. Dissertação (mestrado), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
BARBOSA, V.M., CANÇADO, S.V., BAIÃO, N.C., LANA, A.M.Q., LARA, L.J.C. and SOUZA, M.R. (2008) Efeitos da umidade relativa do ar na incubadora e da idade da matriz leve sobre o rendimento da incubação. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 60: 741-748.Google Scholar
BRAKE, J.T. (1996) Optimización del almacenaje de huevos fértiles. Avicultura Profesional 14: 26-31.Google Scholar
BRUZUAL, J.J., PEAK, S.D., BRAKE, J. and PEEBLES, E.D. (2000a) Effects of relative humidity during incubation on hatchability and body weight of broiler chicks from young breeder flocks. Poultry Science 79: 827-830.Google Scholar
BRUZUAL, J.J., PEAK, S.D., BRAKE, J. and PEEBLES, E.D. (2000b) Effects of relative humidity during the last five days of incubation and brooding temperature on performance of broiler chicks from young broiler breeders. Poultry Science 79: 1385-1391.Google Scholar
BUHR, R.J. (1995) Incubation relative humidity effects on allantoic fluid volume and hatchability. Poultry Science 74: 874-884.Google Scholar
CHRISTENSEN, V.L. (1997) Embryonic turkey respiration important to hatch and quality. Poultry Digest 55: 21-23.Google Scholar
CUTCHIN, H.R., WINELAND, M.J., CHRISTENSEN, V.L., DAVIS, S. and MANN, K.M. (2009) Embryonic development when eggs are turned different angles during incubation. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 447-451.Google Scholar
DECUYPERE, E. (2001) El pollito de un día, una bisagra crucial entre los reproductores y el broiler. World's Poultry Science Journal 57: p.127-138.Google Scholar
DECUYPERE, E., MALHEIROS, R.D., MORAES, V.M.B. and BRUGGEMAN, V. (2003) Fisiologia do embrião, in: GONZALES, E. & MACARI, M. (Eds) Manejo da Incubação, pp. 65-94 (Campinas: FACTA).Google Scholar
DEEMING, D.C. (1989) Characteristics of unturned eggs: Critical period, retarded embryonic growth and poor albumen utilization. British Poultry Science 30: 239-249.Google Scholar
ELIBOL, O. and BRAKE, J. (2003) Effect of frequency of turning from tree to eleven days of incubation on hatchability of broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 45: 631-637.Google Scholar
ELIBOL, O. and BRAKE, J. (2004) Identification of critical periods for turning broiler hatching eggs during incubation. British Poultry Science 45: 631-637.Google Scholar
ELIBOL, O. and BRAKE, J. (2006a) Effect of egg turning angle and frequency during incubation on hatchability and incidence of unhatched broiler embryos with head in the small end of the egg. Poultry Science 85: 1433-1437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ELIBOL, O. and BRAKE, J. (2006b) Effect of flock age, cessation of egg turning, and turning frequency through the second week of incubation on hatchability of broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 85: 1498-1501.Google Scholar
ELIBOL, O. and BRAKE, J. (2008) Effect of egg position during three and fourteen days of storage and turning frequency during subsequent incubation on hatchability of broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 87: 1237-1241.Google Scholar
FRENCH, N.A. (1997) Modeling incubation temperature: the effects of incubator design, embryonic development, and egg size. Poultry Science 76: 124-133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FRENCH, N.A. and TULLETT, S.G. (1991) Variation in the eggs of various poultry species, in: TULLETT, S.G. (Ed.) Avian incubation, pp. 59-77 (London: Butterworth-Heinemann).Google Scholar
MAHMUD, A. and PASHA, T.N. (2008) Effect of storage, pre-heating and turning during holding period on the hatchability of broiler breeder eggs. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 28: 153-154.Google Scholar
MARQUES, D. (1994) Fundamentos Básicos de Incubação Industrial, pp. 1-143 (São Paulo: CASP).Google Scholar
MAULDIN, J.M. and BUHR, R.J. (1995) What is really happening in your incubation? International Hatchery Practice 9: 19-22.Google Scholar
MEIR, M. and AR, A. (2008) Changes in eggshell conductance, water loss and hatchability of layer hens with flock age and moulting. British Poultry Science 49: 677-684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NORTH, M.O. and BELL, D.D. (1990) Factors affecting hatchability, in: NORTH, M.O. (Ed.) Commercial chicken production manual, pp.103-134 (New York: Chapman & Hall).Google Scholar
PEARSON, J.T., HAQUE, M.A., HOU, P-C.L. and TAZAWA, H. (1996) Developmental patterns of O2 consumption, heart rate and O2 pulse in unturned eggs. Respiration Physiology 103: 83-87.Google Scholar
PEEBLES, E.D., BURNHAM, M.R., GARDNER, C.W., BRAKE, J., BRUZUAL, J.J. and GERARD, P.P. (2001) Effects of incubational humidity and hen age on embryo composition in broiler hatching eggs from young breeders. Poultry Science 80: 1299-1304.Google Scholar
PROUDFOOT, F.G., HULAN, H.W. and McRAE, K.B. (1981) The effect of transferring hen eggs from turning to stationary trays after 13 to 20 days of incubation on subsequent hatchability and general performance. Poultry Science 60: 302-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSA, P.S., SCHEUERMANN, G.N. and FIGUEIREDO, E.A.P. (1999) Influência da umidade na incubadora sobre o desempenho de incubação em ovos com diferentes densidades específicas. Anais da Conferência Apinco de Ciências e Tecnologias Avícolas, Campinas, pp.10.Google Scholar
ROSA, P.S., GUIDONI, A.L., LIMA, I.L. and BERSCH, F.X.R. (2002) Influência da temperatura de incubação em ovos de matrizes de corte com diferentes idades e classificados por peso sobre os resultados de incubação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 31: 1011-1016.Google Scholar
SALAZAR, A.I. (2000) El proceso de incubación. Avicultura Profesional 18: 26-30.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, G. (1999) Understanding high yield broiler incubation. Zootecnica International 22: 32-36.Google Scholar
TONA, K., DECUYPERE, E. and COUCKE, W. (2001) Effects of strain, hen age and transferring eggs from turning to stationary trays after 15 to 18 days of incubation. British Poultry Science 42: 663-667.Google Scholar
TONA, K., ONAGBESAN, O., DE KETELAERE, B., DECUYPERE, E. and BRUGGEMAN, V. (2003) Effects of turning duration during incubation on corticosterone and thyroid hormone levels, gas pressure in air cell, chick quality, and juvenile growth. Poultry Science 82: 1947-1979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TONA, K., ONAGBESAN, E., BRUGGEMAN, V., MERTENS, K. and DECUYPERE, E. (2005) Effects of turning duration during incubation on embryo growth, utilization of albumen, and stress regulation. Poultry Science 84: 315-320.Google Scholar
TULLETT, S.G. and BURTON, F.G. (1982) Factors affecting the weight and water status of the chick at hatch. British Poultry Science 23: 361-369.Google Scholar
TULLETT, S.G. and DEEMING, D.C. (1987) Failure to turn eggs during incubation: Effects on embryo weight, development of the chorioallantois and absorption of albumen. British Poultry Science 28: 239-243.Google Scholar
TULLETT, S.G. (1990) Science and the art of incubation. Poultry Science 69: 1-15.Google Scholar
VICK, S.V., BRAKE, J. and WALSH, T.J. (1993) Relationship of incubator humidity and flock age to hatchability of broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 72: 251-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILSON, H.R. (1991) Physiological requirements of the developing embryo: Temperature and turning, in: TULLETT, S.G. (Ed.) Avian incubation, pp. 145-156 (London: Butterworth-Heinemann).Google Scholar
WILSON, H.R. and WILMERING, R.F. (1988) Hatchability as affected by egg turning in high density plastic egg flats during the last half of incubation. Poultry Science 67: 685-688.Google Scholar
WINELAND, M.J. and CHRISTENSEN, V.L. (2003) Effect of egg moisture loss upon the embryo and growing chick. International Hatchery Practice 17: 17.Google Scholar