Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:03:52.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Egg washing using small-scale bucket washer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

M.L. Hutchison*
Affiliation:
Direct Laboratories Research Division, Woodthorne, Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
L.D. Walters
Affiliation:
Direct Laboratories Research Division, Woodthorne, Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
J. Gittins
Affiliation:
The Poultry Team, Ceres House, Searby Road, Lincoln, United Kingdom
L. Drysdale
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Hannah Research Park, Ayr, United Kingdom
N. Sparks
Affiliation:
Avian Science Research Centre, Animal Health Group, SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
*
Get access

Abstract

The microbiological implications of using a small-scale bucket-style washer are reported forchicken eggs. On average, the bucket washerreduced the total bacterial numbers on the surface of eggs under manufacturer-recommended conditions from 5.36 log CFU egg-1 to 2.82 log CFU egg-1. No evidence of enhanced bacterial contamination of the egg contents was found when microbiological examination was undertaken a few hours afterwashing. When washing visibly soiled free-range eggs, there was a tendency forthe wash-waterto become dirty afteronly a few batches of eggs had been washed. Washing in dirty water could increase the numbers of bacteria on the surfaces of those shells which were visibly clean before washing. These additional shell-surface bacteria however, were not detected in the egg contents (n=1032), when analyses were undertaken 1–2 hours after washing. In contrast, when washed eggs were stored for2 weeks at 15°C, we found that bacterial numbers in the egg contents were elevated when compared with unwashed controls. To determine if cool washing temperatures could cause water to taken up by egg contents, eggs were warmed to 37°C, 30°C, 25°C or 20°C and were submerged in aqueous protein stain at 15°C forup to 7 minutes. We did not observe take up of the stain solution unless its temperature was 15°C cooler than the egg contents and the eggs were immersed forat least 3 minutes.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, F.M., Laird, J.M., Addison, C.L. and Mckellar, R.C. (1993) The analysis of egg wash-water for the rapid assessment of microbiological quality. Poultry Science 72: 15841591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Board, R.G. (1977) The microbiology of eggs. In: Egg Science and Technology (2nd Ed.) (Eds. Stadelman, W J and Cotterill, O J.) AVI Publishing Co. Inc., Westport Connecticut. pp4964.Google Scholar
Board, R.G., Sparks, N.H.C. and Tranter, H.S. (1986) Antimicrobial defence of avian eggs. In: Natural Antimicrobial Systems (Eds. WGould, G, Rhodes Roberts, M E, Charnley, AK) Bath University Press, Bath UK.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, J.A. (1970) Role of microbial iron transport compounds in the bacterial spoilage of eggs. Applied Microbiology 20: 558560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, T. (1994) Contamination of Eggshells and Contents with Salmonella Enteritidis: A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology 21: 3140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchison, M.L., Gittins, J., Walker, A., Moore, A., Burton, C. and Sparks, N. (2003) Washing table eggs: A review of the scientific and engineering issues. World's Poultry Science Journal 59: 233247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, M.L., Gittins, J., Walker, A., Sparks, N.Humphrey, T.J., Burton, C. and Moore, A. (2004) An assessment of the microbiological risks involved with egg washing under commercial conditions. Journal of Food Protection 67: 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leclair, K., Heggart, H., Oggel, M., Bartlett, F.M. and Mckellar, R.C. (1994) Modelling the inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium in simulated egg wash-water. Food Microbiology 11: 345353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucore, L., Jones, F.T., Anderson, K.E. and Curtis, P.A. (1997) Internal and external bacterial counts from shells of eggs washed in a commercial-type processor at various wash-water temperatures. Journal of Food Protection 60: 13241328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moats, W.A. (1978) Egg washing – a review. Journal of Food Protection 41: 919925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparks, N.H.C. (1985) The hen's eggshell: a resistance network. PhD Thesis, University of Bath.Google Scholar
Sparks, N.H.C. (1994) Shell accessory materials: structure and function. In: Microbiology of the Avian Egg. (Eds. Board, R G and Fuller, R). Chapman and Hall London.Google Scholar