Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:42:51.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indigenous chicken production in South-east Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

I. Aini
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Get access

Abstract

The poultry industry of South-east Asia has two important types of production. These are: a commercial sector, characterized by its use of highly intensive units and the fact that it has developed very rapidly over the past two decades; and the traditional village-based system which has been little affected by the increasing numbers of commercial birds. The village poultry system relies on minimal resource input and, although secondary to other agricultural activities, has an important role in providing the local population with income and high quality protein. Almost every rural community keeps small flocks of indigenous chickens under a backyard type system. The sheds, when provided, are made from local materials. Whilst the birds are fed kitchen left-overs, sometimes supplemented with cheap, locally available grains, most of their time is spent scavenging. There is no breeding programme and close inbreeding occurs among the indigenous stocks. The high incidence of disease is the greatest constraint on rural poultry development.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1984a) APHCA Report of the Ninth Session, New Delhi, India, 8–13 October, 1984. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, BangkokGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1984b) Country file: Indonesia. Poultry International 23(3): 1434Google Scholar
Anon. (1984c) Country file: Philippines. Poultry International 23(4): 1822Google Scholar
Anon. (1986a) Buku Statistik Peternakan Ditjennak, JakartaGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1986b) APHCA Report of the Eleventh Session, Bangkok, Thailand, 7–13 October, 1986. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, BangkokGoogle Scholar
Atienza, V.C. (1987) Philippines. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) IAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 9395Google Scholar
Azahan, E.E.A. and Zahari, W.M. (1983) Observation on some characteristics of carcass and meat of Malaysian kampong chickens. MARDI Research Bulletin 11: 225232Google Scholar
Bachtiar, Moerad (1987) Indonesia: disease control. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 7376Google Scholar
Beebe, W. (1926) The junglefowl — Gallus. In: Pheasants. Their Lives and Homes pp. 240245Google Scholar
Collias, N.E. and Saichuae, P. (1967) Ecology of the Red Junglefowl in Thailand and Malaya with reference to the origin of domestication. The Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 22: 188209Google Scholar
Hussein, A.A. (1987) Malaysia: disease control. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: A New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 7980Google Scholar
Jintana, D. (1987) Thailand: poultry production. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 108109Google Scholar
Leong, E. and Jalaludin, S. (1982) Integrated system for traditional poultry farming in South-east Asian countries. World's Poultry Science Journal 38: 213219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, B.T. (1987) Malaysia: Economic importance. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 8385Google Scholar
Ramlah, H. and Shukor, M.N. (1987) Malaysia: production systems. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 8688Google Scholar
Ronohardjo, P., Wilson, A.J. and Hirst, R.G. (1985) Current livestock disease status in Indonesia. Penyakitc Hewan 17(29): 217226Google Scholar
Sani, R.A., Harisah, M., Aini, I. and Shah Majid, M. (1987) Malaysia: fowl diseases. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 8992Google Scholar
Shortridge, K.F., Allan, W.H. and Alexander, D.J. (1981) Review: Newcastle disease situation in South-east Asia. In: Newcastle Disease and Its Control in South-east Asia (Ed. Shortridge, K.F.) Hong Kong University Press, pp. 97100Google Scholar
Supramaniam, P. (1987) Malaysia: poultry production. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a new Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 8182Google Scholar
Supramaniam, P. (1988) Economic importance of Newcastle disease vaccine to the village poultry industry in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the Second Asian/Pacific Poultry Health Conference, Surfer's ParadiseAustralia23–25 September 1988: Poultry Diseases, pp. 511516Google Scholar
Uthan Tint, (1987) Burma. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 6668Google Scholar
Wimon, Pariyakanok (1987) Thailand: disease control. In: Newcastle Disease in Poultry: a New Food Pellet Vaccine (Ed. Copland, J.W.) ACIAR Monograph No. 5, Canberra, pp. 105107Google Scholar