Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:57:19.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Layer breeding strategies: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

A.K. THIRUVENKADAN ,
S. PANNEERSELVAM  and
R. PRABAKARAN
A.K. THIRUVENKADAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal-637 002,Tamil Nadu, India
S. PANNEERSELVAM
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal-637 002, Tamil Nadu, India
R. PRABAKARAN
Affiliation:
Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chenai-600 051, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Corresponding author: drthirusiva @yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Layer breeding companies apply selection criteria to improve over 30 traits important for commercial egg production. Intensive selection for egg production over the decades has resulted in a significant reduction in genetic and phenotypic variations in egg production, however the decrease in genetic variation observed in commercial lines are not yet critical. Peak production now approaches the biological limit of one egg a day, but in early production (at sexual maturity) and late production (persistency) genetic variation is still high. Including these traits in the selection criteria will improve the egg production in commercial birds. Due to high heritability and the absence of any significant negative effects on production parameters, residual feed consumption is used as selection criteria to improve the feed efficiency. Considerable research has been carried out on egg weight, eggshell strength and internal quality of the eggs and improvements have been made as a result of selection. With the reintroduction of floor system and increased consumer interest in processed eggs, in future more emphases have to be given to the eggshell strength and internal quality of the eggs. Poultry production in the unfavourable environmental conditions of the tropics is hindered by direct and indirect heat stress leading to a general depression in performance. Results on the utilisation of naked-neck and frizzle gene in high-ambient temperatures is encouraging, and, in future, will play an important role in production of layer lines suitable for overcoming such genotype-environment interaction. Feather pecking is an undesirable behaviour, which causes major problems in non-cage systems. Several authors have identified a hereditary basis of feather pecking behaviour, which is suggested by strain differences. Hence, selection of birds with no or very low tendency to perform feather pecking should reduce the incidence. Recent molecular genetic studies resulted in identification of QTL affecting different economic traits and identification of candidate genes causing variation in performance among birds. In future these findings will play a major role in further genetic improvement of layers without any negative effect.

Keywords

layerbreeding strategiesfeed efficiencyfeather peckingmolecular genetics
Type
Small-scale Family Poultry Production
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 477 - 502
Copyright
World's Poultry Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABASHT, B., DEKKERS, J.C.M. and LAMONT, S.J. (2006) Review of quantitative trait loci in the chicken. Poultry Science 85: 2079-2096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AMBROSEN, T. and PETERSEN, V.E. (1997) The influence of protein level in diet on cannibalism and quality of plumage of layers. Poultry Science 76: 559-563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AMILLS, M., JIMENEZ, N., VILLALBA, D., TOR, M., MOLINA, E., CUBILO, D., MARCOS, C., FRANCESCH, A., SANCHEZ, A. and ESTANY, J. (2003) Identification of three single nucleotide polymorphisms in the chicken insulin-like growth factor 1 and 2 genes and their associations with growth and feeding traits. Poultry Science 82: 1485-1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ANANG, A., MIELENZ, N. and SCHÜLER, L. (2001) Monthly model for genetic evaluation of laying hens 1. Fixed regression. British Poultry Science 42: 2, 191-196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ANANG, A., MIELENZ, N. and SCHÜLER, L. (2002) Monthly model for genetic evaluation of laying hens II. Random regression, British Poultry Science 43: 384-390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ARTHUR, J.A. and ALBERS, G.A.A. (2003) Industrial perspective on problems and issues associated with poultry breeding, in: MUIR, W.M. & AGGREY, S.E. (Eds) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 1-12 (CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K).Google Scholar
BAIN, M.M. (2005) Recent advances in the assessment of eggshell quality and their future application. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 268-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENNETT, A.K., HESTER, P.Y. and SPURLOCK, D.E.M. (2006) Polymorphisms in vitamin D receptor, osteopontin, insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin, and their associations with bone, egg and growth traits in a layer-broiler cross in chickens. Animal Genetics 37: 283-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENNETT, A.K., HESTER, P.Y. and SPURLOCK, D.E.M. (2007) Relationships of a transforming growth factor-β2 single nucleotide polymorphism and messenger ribonucleic acid abundance with bone and production traits in chickens. Poultry Science 86: 829-834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BESSEI, W. (1995) Proceedings of the 17th World's Poultry Science Congress, Helsinki, Finland. pp.458-469.Google Scholar
BESSEI, W. (2002) Selection for behaviour in poultry. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
BISHOP, S.C., FLEMING, R.H., MCCORMACK, H.A., FLOCK, D.K. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (2000) The inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. British Poultry Science 41: 33-40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOHREN, B.B., KINNEY, T.B, WILSON, S.P. and LOWE, P.C. (1970) Genetic gain in annual egg production from selection on early part-record percent production in the fowl. Genetics 65: 655-667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BORDAS, A., MERAT, P. and MINVIELLE, F. (1996) Heterosis in egg laying lines under divergent selection for residual feed consumption. Poultry Science 75: 20-24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BORDAS, A. and MINVIELLE F., (1999) Patterns of growth and feed intake in divergent lines of laying domestic fowl selected for residual feed consumption. Poultry Science 78: 317-323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BORDAS, A., TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. and MERAT, P. (1992) Direct and correlated responses to divergent selection for residual food intake in Rhode Island Red laying hens. British Poultry Science 33: 741-754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BUITENHUIS, A.J. and KJAER, J.B. (2008) Long term selection for reduced or increased pecking behaviour in laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 64: 477-487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUITENHUIS, A.J., RODENBURG, T.B., HIERDEN, Y.M.V., SIWEK, M., CORNELISSEN, S.J.B., NIEUWLAND, M.G.B., CROOIJMANS, R.P.M.A., GROENEN, M.A.M., KOENE, P., KORTE, S.M., BOVENHUIS, H. and VAN DER POEL, J.J. (2003a) Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci affecting feather pecking behavior and stress response in laying hens. Poultry Science 82: 1215-1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BUITENHUIS, A.J., RODENBURG, T.B., SIWEK, M., CORNELISSEN, S.J.B., NIEUWLAND, M.G.B., CROOIJMANS, R.P., GROENEN, M.A., KOENE, P., BOVENHUIS, H. and VAN DER POEL, J.J. (2003b) Identification of quantitative trait loci for receiving pecks in young and adult laying hens. Poultry Science 82: 1661-1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUITENHUIS, A.J., RODENBURG, T.B., WISSINK, P.H., VISSCHER, J., KOENE, P., BOVENHUIS, H. DUCRO B.J. and VAN DER POEL J.J., (2004) Genetic and phenotypic correlations between feather pecking behavior, stress response, immune response, and egg quality traits in laying hens. Poultry Science 83: 1077-1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CARLBORG, , Ö., , KERJE, S., SCHUTZ, K., JACOBSSON, L., JENSEN, P. and ANDERSSON, L. (2003) A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken. Genome Research 13: 413-421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHEN, C.F., BORDAS, A. and TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. (2002) Effect of high ambient temperature and naked neck genotype on egg production in purebred and crossbred dwarf brown-egg layers selected for improved clutch length. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
CHEN, C.F. and TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. (2003) Correlated responses to long-term selection for clutch length in dwarf brown-egg layers carrying or not carrying the naked neck gene. Poultry Science 82: 709-720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHEN, C.F., HUANG, N.Z., GOURICHON, D., LEE, Y.P., TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. and BORDAS, A. (2008) Effect of Introducing the Naked Neck Gene in a Line Selected for Low Residual Feed Consumption on Performance in Temperate or Subtropical Environments. Poultry Science 87: 1320-1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHEN, C.F., GOURICHON, D., HUANG, N.Z., LEE, Y.P., BORDAS, A. and TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. (2009) Performance comparison of dwarf laying hens segregating for the naked neck gene in temperate and subtropical environments. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009, 41:13 doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COLE, R.K. (2000) An autosomal dwarfism in the domestic fowl. Poultry Science 79: 1507-1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COUCH, J.R. (1955) Cage layer fatigue. Feed Age 5: 55-57.Google Scholar
CRAIG, J.V. and MUIR, W.M. (1993) Selection for reduction of beak-inflicted injuries among caged hens. Poultry Science 72: 411-420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRANSBERG, P.H., PARKINSON, G.B., WILSON, S. and THORP, B.H. (2001) Sequential studies of skeletal calcium reserves and structural bone volume in a commercial layer flock. British Poultry Science 42: 260-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE KETELAERE, B., COUCKE, P. and DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. (2000) Eggshell crack detection based on acoustic resonance frequency analysis. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Research 76: 157-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE KETELAERE, B., GOVAERTS, T., COUCKE, P. DEWIL, E., , VISSCHER, J., DECUYPERE, E. and DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. (2002) Measuring the eggshell strength of 6 different genetic strains of laying hens: technique and comparisons. British Poultry Science 43: 238-244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DUNN, I.C., BAIN, M.M., EDMOND, A., WILSON, P.W., JOSEPH, N., SOLOMAN, S. DE KETELAERE, B., , DE BAERDEMAEKER, J., SCHMUTZ, M., PREISINGER, R. and WADDINGTON, D. (2005) Heritability and genetic correlation of measurements derived from resonant frequency analysis; a novel method of determining eggshell quality in domestic fowl. British Poultry Sciences 46: 280-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLEMING, R.H., KORVER, D.R., MCCORMACK, H. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (2004) Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Digitized fluoroscopy and ultrasound. Poultry Science 83: 207-214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FLEMING, R.H., MCCORMACK, H.A., MCTEIR, L. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (1998) Medullary bone and humeral breaking strength in laying hens. Research in Veterinary Science 64: 63-67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FLOCK, D.K. (1998) Genetic-economic aspects of feed efficiency in laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 54: 225-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLOCK, D.K., LAUGHLIN, K.F. and BENTLEY, J. (2005) Minimizing losses in poultry breeding and production: how breeding companies contribute to poultry welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 227-237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLOCK, D.K. and PREISINGER, R. (2002) Breeding plans for poultry with emphasis on sustainability. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
FRANCESCH, A., ESTANY, J., ALFONSO, L. and ISLESIAS, M. (1997) Genetic parameters for egg number, egg weight and eggshell colour in three Catalan poultry breeds. Poultry Science 76: 1627-1631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FULTON, J.E. (2008) Molecular genetics in a modern poultry breeding organization. World's Poultry Science Journal 64: 171-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GABARROU, J.F., GERAERT, P.A., FEANCOIS, N., GUILLAUMIN, S., PICARD, M. and BORDAS, A. (1998) Energy balance of laying hens selected on residual feed consumption. British Poultry Science 39: 79-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOWE, S.R. and STRAIN, H.J. (1963) Effect of selection for increased egg production based on part-year records in two strains of White Leghorns. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 5: 99.Google Scholar
GROEN, A.F. (2003) Breeding objectives and selection strategies for layer production, in: MUIR, W.M. & AGGREY, S.E. (Eds) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 1-12 (CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.).Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, M., GOSSMAN, T.N. and KOOPS, W.J. (2000) A model for persistency of egg production. Poultry Science 79: 1715-1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GROSSMAN, M. and KOOPS, W.J. (2001) A model for individual egg production in chickens. Poultry Science 80: 859-867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HALL, L.E., SHIRLEY, R.B., BAKALLI, R.I., AGGREY, S.E., PESTI, G.M. and EDWARDS, H.M. JR. (2003) Power of two methods for the estimation of bone ash of broilers. Poultry Science 82: 414-418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HESTER, P.Y., SCHREIWEIS, M.A., ORBAN, J.I., MAZZUCO, H., KOPKA, M.N., LEDUR, M.C. and MOODY, D.E. (2004) Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Poultry Science 83: 215-221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HICKS, C., MUIR, W.M. and STICK, D.K. (1998) Selection index updating for maximizing rate of annual genetic gain in laying hens. Poultry Science 77: 1-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HOCKING, P.M. (2005) Review of QTL mapping results in chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 215-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HONKATUKIA, M., REESE, K., PREISINGER, R., TUISKULA-HAAVISTO, M., WEIGEND, S., ROITO, J., MAKI-TANILA, A. and VILKKI, J. (2005) Fishy taint in chicken eggs is associated with a substitution within a conserved motif of the FMO3 gene. Genomics. 86: 225-32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HONKATUKIA, M., REESE, K., PREISINGER, R., WEIGEND, S., ROITO, J., TUISKULA-HAAVISTO, M., MAKI-TANILA, A. and VILKKI, J. (2006) A genetic marker against fishy taint in brown egg layers. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 13-18, 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilGoogle Scholar
HORST, P., MATHUR, P.K. and VALLE-ZARATE, A. (1995) Breeding policies for specific tropical environments using appropriate combination of major genes. Proceedings of the World's Poultry Congress, New Delhi, India, pp.633-640.Google Scholar
HUBER-EICHER, B. (1997) An experimental study on the development of feather pecking in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). Inaugural dissertation der Philosophischnaturwissenschaftlichen fakultat der Universitat Bern. Switzerland. pp.1-57.Google Scholar
JIANG, R., LI, J., QU, L., LI, H. and YANG, N. (2004) A new single nucleotide polymorphism in the chicken pituitary - specific transcription factor (POU1F1) gene associated with growth rate. Animal Genetics 35: 344-346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KJAER, J.B. (1999) Genetic parameters of feather pecking and effect of direct selection. Proceedings of Poultry Genetics Symposium, October 6-8, Mariensee, Germany, pp.97-103.Google Scholar
KJAER, J.B. (2001) Genetic aspects of feather pecking and cannibalism, in: OESTER , H. & WYSS, C. (Eds) Proceedings of the 6th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, pp. 189-197 (World's Poultry Science Association, Swiss Branch, Druckerei Arm, Bern).Google Scholar
KJAER, J.B. (2004) Diurnal rhythm of feather pecking behaviour and condition of integuments in four strains of loose housed laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 331-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KJAER, J.B. and MENCH, J.A. (2003) Behaviour problems associated with selection for increased production, in: MUIR, W.M. & AGGREY, S.E. (Eds) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 67-82 (CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.).Google Scholar
KJAER, J.B. and SØRENSEN, P. (1997) Feather pecking behaviour in White Leghorns, a genetic study. British Poultry Science 38: 333-341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KJAER, J.B., SØRENSEN, P. and SU, G. (2001) Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in Laying Hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 229-239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KORVER, D.R., SAUNDERS-BLADES, J.L. and NADEAU, K.L. (2004) Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Quantitative computed tomography. Poultry Science 83: 222-229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LUITING, P. and URFF, E.M. (1991) Residual feed consumption in laying hens. 1. Quantification of phenotypic variation and repeatabilities. Poultry Science 70: 1655-1662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAHROUS, M., GALAL, A., FATHI, M.M. and EL-DEIN, A.Z. (2003) Improving productivity of layer chickens in hot environmental condition by introducing naked neck and frizzle genes. Egyptian Poultry Journal 23: 393-408.Google Scholar
MATHUR, P.K. (2003) Genotype-Environment interactions : problems associated with selection for increased production, in: MUIR, W.M. & AGGREY, S.E. (Eds) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 83-100 (CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.).Google Scholar
MISSOHOU, A., DIENG, A., HORST, P., ZARATE, V. A., NESSEIM, T. and TCHEDRE, K. (2003) Effect of dwarf (dw) and frizzle (F) genes on the performance of layers under Senegalese conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production 35: 373-380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MUIR, W.M. (1990) Association between persistency of lay and partial record egg production in White Leghorn hens and implications to selection programmes for annual egg production. Poultry Science 69: 1447-1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUIR, W.M. (1996) Group selection for adaptation to multiple hen cages: Selection program and direct responses. Poultry Science 75: 447-458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MUIR, W.M. (2003) Indirect selection for improvement of animal well-being, in: MUIR, W.M. & AGGREY, S.E. (Eds) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 247-256 (CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.).Google Scholar
MUIR, W.M. and CRAIG, J.V. (1998) Improving animal well-being through selection. Poultry Science 77: 1781-1788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NAGARAJA, S.C., AGGREY, S.E., YAO, J., ZADWORNY, D., FAIRFULL, R.W. and KUHNLEIN, U. (2000) Trait association of a genetic marker near the IGF-I gene in egg-laying chickens. Journal of Heredity 91: 150-156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NIRASAWA, K., NAGAMINE, Y., TAKAHASHI, H., TAKEDA, H., FURUKAWA, T. and TAKEDA, (1998) Genetic parameters and the improvement for eggshell strength in domestic fowl. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, January 11-16, 1998, Armidale, Australia. Vol. 24:271-277.Google Scholar
RENNIE, J.S., FLEMING, R.H., MCCORMACK, H.A., MCCORQUODALE, C.C. and WHITEHEAD, C.C. (1997) Studies on effects of nutritional factors on bone structure and osteoporosis in laying hens. British Poultry Science 38: 417-424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAZANOV., A.A., STEKOLNIKOVA, V.A., KORCZAK. M., , SAZANOVA, A.L., JASZCZAK, K., ZIEBA, G. and MALEWSKI, T. (2007) Expression of positional candidates for shell thickness in the chicken. Poultry Science 86: 202-205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHREIWEIS, M.A., HESTER, P.Y., SETTAR, P. and MOODY, D.E. (2005) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with egg quality, egg production and body weight in an F2 resource population of chickens. Animal Genetics 37: 106-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHULMAN, N., TUISKULA-HAAVISTO., M., SIITONEN, L. and MANTYSAARI, E.A. (1994) Genetic variation of residual feed consumption in a selected Finnish egg-layer population. Poultry Science 73: 1479-1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEWALEM, A., MORRICE, D.M., LAW, A.S., WINDSOR, D., HALEY, C.S., IKEOBI, C.O.N., BURT, D.W. and HOCKING, P.M. (2002) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for body weight at 3, 6 and 9 weeks of age in a broiler layer cross . Poultry Science 81: 1775-1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHELDON, B.L. (2000) Research and development in 2000: directions and priorities for the world's poultry science community. Poultry Science 79: 147-158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SILVERSIDES, F.G., KORVER, D.R. and BUGELL, K.L. (2006) Effect of strain of layer and age at photostimulation on egg production, egg quality and bone strength. Poultry Science 85: 1136-1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SIWEK, M., CORNELISSEN, S.J.B., BUITENHUIS, A.J., NIEUWLAND, M.G.B., BOVENHUIS, H., CROOIJMANS, R., GROENEN, M.A.M., PARMENTIER, H.K. and VAN DER POEL, J.J. (2004) Quantitative trait loci for body weight in layers differ from quantitative trait loci specific for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells. Poultry Science 83: 853-859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SØRENSEN, P. and KJAER, J.B. (1999) Comparison of high yielding and medium yielding hens in an organic system, in: PREISINGER, R. (Ed.) Proceedings of Poultry Genetics Symposium, 6-8 October, Mariensee, Germany, p. 145.Google Scholar
TIXIER-BOICHARD, M., BOICHARD, D., GOENEVELD, E. and BORDAS, A. (1995) Restricted maximum likelihood estimates of genetic parameters of adult male and female Rhode Island Red chickens divergently selected for residual feed consumption. Poultry Science 74: 1245-1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TUISKULA-HAAVISTO, M., HONKATUKIA, M., VILKKI, J., DE KONING, D.J., SCHULMAN, N.F and MAKI-TANILA, A. (2002) Mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting quality and production traits in egg layers. Poultry Science 81: 919-927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAISANEN, J. and JENSEN, P. (2004) Responses of young Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers to familiar and unfamiliar social stimuli. Poultry Science 83: 335-343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAN EERDEN, E., VAN DEN BRAND, H., PARMENTIER, H.K., DE JONG, M.C.M. and KEMP, B. (2004b) Phenotypic selection for residual feed intake and its effect on humoral immune responses in growing layer hens. Poultry Science 83: 1602-1609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAN EERDEN, E., VAN DEN BRAND, H., DE VRIES REILINGH, G., PARMENTIER, H.K., DE JONG, M.C.M. and KEMP, B. (2004a) Residual feed intake and its effect on Salmonella enteritidis infection in growing layer hens. Poultry Science 83: 1904-1910CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WEBSTER, A.B. (2004) Welfare implication of avian osteoporosis. Poultry Science 83: 184-192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHITEHEAD, C.C. and FLEMING, R.H. (2000) Osteoporosis in cage layers. Poultry Science 79: 1033-1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHITEHEAD, C.C., FLEMING, R.H., JULIAN, R.J. and SØRENSEN, P. (2003) Skeletal problems associated with selection for increased production, in: MUIR, W.M. & AGGREY, S.E. (Eds) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology (CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.)Google Scholar
YANG, N., NING, Z., WANG, Q., LI, J. and WU, C. (1996) Application of the sex-linked dwarf gene to improving feed efficiency of layers. Proceedings of the 20th World's Poultry Congress, New Delhi, India. pp. 447-451.Google Scholar
YU, G., ZHIQIANG, D., XIAOXIANG, H., XUEMEI, D. and NING, L. (2006) Identification of QTL for shank length at different developmental stages in chickens using a genome scan. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 13-18, 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Google Scholar
ZHANG, L.C., NING, Z.H., XU, G.Y., HOU, Z.C. and YANG, N. (2005) Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poultry Science 84: 1209-1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed