Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:09:28.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Past and future of poultry meat harvesting technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

S. BARBUT
S. BARBUT*
Affiliation:
Food Science Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1
*
Corresponding author: sbarbut@uoguelph.ca
Get access

Abstract

The poultry industry has seen significant changes in the methods used to harvest fresh poultry meat over the past four decades. Some of the major changes include a more than four-fold increase in line speed (new plants are designed to process 12,000 broilers per hour), a large increase in the proportion of cut up and deboned meat produced, as well as substantial improvements in sanitation. These advancements have been possible by gaining knowledge in areas such as computer science (e.g. image analysis, on line weighing and tracking), live bird handling (transportation, unloading, stunning), muscle biology (post mortem processes), heat and mass transfer (scalding, chilling), and engineering (machine building, metallurgy). This article includes a general overview of the different steps involved in primary poultry processing and focuses on some of the principles that have been used to achieve greater efficiencies in mechanising the whole process. The focus areas include stunning, electrical stimulation, chilling, and mechanical filleting. These topics will be used to demonstrate the importance of obtaining high meat quality (e.g. fewer downgrades, high water holding, acceptable tenderness and colour) currently demanded by processors as well as consumers. The advantages of in-line-processing will also be highlighted, where improved efficiencies have been achieved by incorporating real-time computerised monitoring and tracking systems.

Overall, a comprehensive understanding of the whole process and the integration of the different steps is a challenge that must be met by both the equipment manufacturer and processing plant personnel. Because of the increased complexity of the whole integrated process, it is highly recommended that the processor team up with a very knowledgeable equipment manufacturer who has the technical understanding and experience within all stages of the process (farm gate to fork), to effectively optimise quality, yield, and speed.

Keywords

chillingelectrical stimulationmeat poultryprocessingreviewstunningbroilersturkey
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 399 - 410
Copyright
World's Poultry Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABEYESINGHE, S.M., BEMMEL, H., KRANEN, R.W., WATHES, C.M., LANKHAAR, J.A.C., WHITE, R.P., MCLEMAN, M.A., MCKEEGAN, D.E.F., DEMMERS, T.G.M. and LOWE, J.C. (2007) Controlled atmosphere stunning of broiler chickens. I. Effects on behaviour, physiology and meat quality in a pilot scale system at a processing plant. British Poultry Science 48: 406-423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALLEN, V.M., CORRY, J.E.L., BURTON, C.H., WHYTE, R.T. and MEAD, G.C. (2000) Hygienic aspects of modern poultry chilling. International Journal of Food Microbiology 58: 39-48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BARBUT, S., MOZA, L.F., NATTRESS, F., DILTS, B. and GILL, C.O. (2009) The microbiological conditions of air or water chilled carcasses at the same poultry packing plant . Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 501-507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARBUT, S., SOSNICKI, A.A., LONERGAN, S.M., KNAPP, T., CIOBANU, D.C., GATCLIFFE, L.J., HUFF-LONERGAN, E. and WILSON, E.W. (2008) Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat Science 79: 46-63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BARBUT, S. (2002) Post mortem changes, in: Poultry Products Processing – An Industry Guide, pp. 55-60 (CRC Press, New York, NY).Google Scholar
CASTAÑEDA, M.P., HIRSCHLER, E.M. and SAMS, A.R. (2005) Functionality of electrically stimulated broiler breast meat. Poultry Science 84: 479-481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COENEN, A.M.L., LANKHAAR, J., LOWE, J.C. and and MCKEEGAN D.E.F., (2009) Remote monitoring of electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and behavior during controlled atmosphere stunning in broilers: Implications for welfare. Poultry Science 88: 10-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EU, (2007) European Union: Animal welfare on the farm - laying hens. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/laying_hens_en.htm. Accessed May 2010.Google Scholar
EU, (2009) European Union: Council regulation No 1099/2009 Protection of animals at the time of killing. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF. Accessed May 2010.Google Scholar
GREGORY, N.G. and WILKINS, L.J. (1990) Broken bones in chickens: effect of stunning and processing of broilers. British Poultry Science 31: 53-58.Google Scholar
HILLEBRAS, S.J.W., LAMBOOY, E. and VEERKAMP, C.H. (1995) The effects of alternative electrical and mechanical stunning methods on haemorrhaging and meat quality of broiler breast and thigh muscles. Poultry Science 75: 664-671.Google Scholar
HUEZO, R., NORTHCUTT, J.K., SMITH, D.P., FLETCHER, D.L. and INGRAM, K.D. (2007) Effect of dry air or immersion chilling on recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses. Journal of Food Protection 70: 1829-1834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MEAD, G.C., HUDSON, W.R. and HINTON, M.H. (1993) Microbiological survey of five poultry processing plants in the U.K. British Poultry Science 34: 497-503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRINZ, S., VANOIJEN, G., BESSEI, W., EHINGER, F. and CIENEN, A.M.L. (2010) Effects of water bath stunning on the electroencephalograms and physical reflexes of broilers using a pulsed direct current. Poultry Science 89: 1275-1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAJ, A.B.M., O'CALLAGHAN, M. and KNOWLES, T.G. (2006) The effects of amount and frequency of alternating current used in water bath stunning and of slaughter method on electroencephalograms in broilers. Animal Welfare Journal 15: 7-15.Google Scholar
SCHREURS, F.J.G. (1999) Post-mortem changes in chicken muscle: some key biochemical processes involved in the conversion of muscle to meat. PhD Thesis. http://library.wur.nl/wda/abstracts/ab2561.html.Google Scholar