Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:29:38.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pros and cons of cages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Ian J. H. Duncan
Ian J. H. Duncan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario NlG 2W1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The main advantages of battery cages for laying hens over alternative husbandry systems are (1) increased hygiene resulting in a much lower incidence of diseases in which the infectious agent is spread through the droppings, (2) small group size resulting in a low incidence of social friction, (3) ease of management, (4) absence of litter problems, (5) better working conditions, and (6) a much lower cost of production. The disadvantages are (1) lack of physical and psychological space for the hens, (2) lack of exercise resulting in a higher incidence of metabolic disorders, (3) lack of nesting opportunities resulting in severe frustration for many birds each time an egg is laid, (4) lack of dust bathing opportunities which, although not a severe disadvantage, should still be charged to cages, (5) lack of other behavioural opportunities which again seem not to be a severe disadvantage and which await further elucidation, and (6) a higher incidence of foot lesions.

Keywords

Battery cagesdust bathing behavioureconomicsexercisegroup sizehygienenesting behaviourwelfare
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 381 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, P. and Tauson, R. (1993) Effect of perches at different positions in conventional cages for laying hens of two different strains. Acta Agrictitum Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 43: 228–235Google Scholar
Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O. and Elson, H.A. (1992) Poultry Production Systems: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford, OxonGoogle Scholar
Bareham, J.R. (1976) A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional battery cages. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, H.J. (1983) The relevance of sleep in poultry. World's Poultry Science Joiirnal 39: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, H.J. (1984) Rest in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, H.J. and Metz, J.H.M. (1992) Integration of animal welfare into housing systems for laying hens. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEC (1999) Council directive for laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens kept in various systems of rearing. CEC Directive, 1999/74/EGGoogle Scholar
Collias, N.E., Collias, E.C., Hunsaker, D. and Minning, L. (1966) Locality fixation, mobility and social organization within an unconfined population of Red Jungle Fowl. Animal Behaviour 14: 550–559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Command Paper 2836 (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Husband y Systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M.S. (1981) Priorities in the cage size and flooring preferences of domestic hens. British Poultry Science 22: 255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M.S. (1982) Elusive concept of preferred group size in domestic hens. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M.S. (1985) Cage height preference and use in battery-kept hens. Veterinary Record 116: 345–347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, M.S. (1989) Time budgets in red jungle fowl as a basis for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M.S. and Hardie, S. (1989) Space needs of laying hens. British Poultry Science 30: 413–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H. (1970) Frustration in the fowl. In: Aspects of Poultry Behaviour (Freeman, B.M. and Gordon, R.F., Eds), British Poultry Science, Edinburgh, pp. 15–31Google Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H. (1998) Behavior and behavioral needs. Poulty Science 77: 1766–1772CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, I.J.H. and Fraser, D. (1997) Understanding animal welfare. In: Animal Welfare (Appleby, M.C. and Hughes, B.O., Eds), CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, pp. 19–31Google Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H. and Kite, V.G. (1987) Some investigations into motivation in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 387–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H. and Kite, V.G. (1989) Nest site selection and nest building behaviour in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 37: 215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H., Widowski, T.M., Malleau, A.E., Lindberg, A.C. and Petherick, J.C. (1998) External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 43: 219–228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elson, H.A. (1985) The economics of poultry welfare In: Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Wegner, R.-M., Ed.), German Branch of the World's Poultry Science AssociationCelle pp. 244–253Google Scholar
Emmans, G.C. and Charles, D.R. (1977) Climatic environment and poultry feeding in practice. In: Nutrition and the Climatic Environment (Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D., Eds), Butterworths, London, pp. 31–49Google Scholar
Enström, B. and Schaller, G. (1993) Experimental studies of the health of laying hens in relation to housing system. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Savory, C.J. and Hughes, B.O., Eds), Universities Federation for Animal WelfarePotters Bar pp. 87–96Google Scholar
Faure, J.M. and Mills, A.D. (Editors) (1989) Proceedings of the Third European Symposium on Poultry WelfareFrench Branch of the World's Poultry Science AssociationToursGoogle Scholar
Follensbee, M.E., Duncan, I.J.H. and Widowski, T.M. (1992) Quantifying nesting motivation of domestic hens. Journal of Animal Science 70 (Supplement 1): 50Google Scholar
Fraser, D. (1995) Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the ‘inextricable connection’. Animal Welfare 4: 103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G. and Drost, H. (1993) Air contamination in poultry production systems, 2: The Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Savory, C.J. and Hughes, B.O., Eds), Universities Federation for Animal WelfarePotters Bar pp. 110–116Google Scholar
Hann, C.M. (1980) Some system definitions and characteristics. In: The Laying Hen and its Environment (Moss, R., Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R. (1964) Animal Machines. Vincent Stuart, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hill, A.T. and Binns, M.R. (1973) Effect of varying population density and size on laying performance. 4th European Poultry ConferenceLondon pp. 605–609Google Scholar
Hughes, B.O. (1975a) Spatial preference in the domestic hen. British Veterinary Journal 131: 560–564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, B.O. (1975b) The concept of an optimal stocking density and its selection for egg production. In: Economic Factors Affecting Egg Production (Freeman, B.M. and Boorman, K.N., Eds), British Poultry Science, Edinburgh, pp. 271–298Google Scholar
Hughes, B.O. (1977) Selection of group size by individual laying hens. British Poultry Science 18: 9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B.O. and Appleby, M.C. (1989) Increase of bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Veterinary Record 124: 483–484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeling, L.J. and Duncan, I.J.H. (1989) Interindividual distances and orientation in laying hens housed in groups of three in two different sized enclosures. Applied Animal Behuviour Science 24: 325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, T.G. and Broom, D.M. (1990) Limb bone strength and movement in laying hens from different housing systems. Veterinary Record 126: 354–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeson, S., Diaz, G.J. and Summers, J.D. (1995) Poultry Metabolic Disorders and Mycotoxins. University Books, GuelphGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, A.C. and Nicol, C.J. (1993) Group size preferences in laying hens. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Savory, C.J. and Hughes, B.O., Eds), Universities Federation for Animal WelfarePotters Bar pp. 249–250Google Scholar
Lindberg, A.C. and Nicol, C.J. (1996) Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. British Poultry Science 37: 709–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, N.O. (1978) Health aspects – cages/litter. In: Proceedings of the First Danish Seminar on Poultry Welfare in Egglaying Cages (Sørensen, L.Y., Ed.), National Committee for Poultry and EggsCopenhagen pp. 53–43Google Scholar
Mashaly, M.M., Webb, M.L., Youtz, S.L., Roush, W.B. and Graves, H.B. (1984) Changes in serum corticosterone concentration of laying hens as a response to increased population density. Poultry Science 63: 2271–2274CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride, G., Parer, I.P. and Foenander, F. (1969) The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour Monographs 2: 125–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A.D., Wood-Gush, D.G.M. and Hughes, B.O. (1985a) Genetic analysis of strain differences in pre-laying behaviour in battery cages. British Poultry Science 26: 182–197Google ScholarPubMed
Mills, A.D., Duncan, I.J.H., Slee, G.S. and Clark, J.S.B. (1985b) Heart rate and laying behaviour in two strains of domestic chicken. Physiology and Behaviour 35: 145–147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffat, L. and Duncan, I.J.H. (1999) Effects of food and substrate deprivation on foraging behaviour in laying hens. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Animal ScienceCharlottetown, P.E.I. p. 233Google Scholar
Morgenstern, R. and Lobsiger, C. (1993) Health of laying hens in alternative systems in practice. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Savory, C.J. and Hughes, B.O., Eds), Universities Federation for Animal WelfarePotters Bar pp. 81–86Google Scholar
Nicol, C.J. (1987a) Effect of cage height and area on the behaviour of hens housed in battery cages. British Poultry Science 28: 327–335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, C.J. (1987b) Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 35: 1709–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, V.E. (1981) Deep litter and sloped wire floor housing systems. In: Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Sørensen, L.Y., Ed.), Danish Branch of the Worlds Poultry Science AssociationCopenhagen pp. 127–137Google Scholar
Riddell, C., Helmboldt, C.F., Singson, E.P. and Matterson, L.D. (1968) Bone pathology of birds affected with cage layer fatigue. Avian Diseases 12: 285–297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, L.O., Fry, J.L., Christmas, R.B., Osheen, A.W. and Harris, R.H. (1972) Differences in tibia strength and bone ash among strains of layers. Poultry Science 51: 1612–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1992) Poultry Health and Management. 3rd Edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications,OxfordGoogle Scholar
Savory, C.J. and Hughes, B.O. (Editors), (1993) Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry WelfareUniversities Federation for Animal WelfarePotters BarGoogle Scholar
Savory, C.J., Wood-Gush, D.G.M. and Duncan, I.J.H. (1978) Feeding behaviour in a population of domestic fowls in the wild. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, L.Y. (Editor), (1978) Proceedings of the First Danish Seminar on Poultry Welfare in Egglaying CagesNational Committee for Poultry and EggsCopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, L.Y. (Editor), (1981) Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Poultry WelfareDanish Branch of the World's Poultry Science AssociationCopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Tauson, R. (1981) Need for improvement in construction of cages. In: Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Sørensen, L.Y., Ed.), Danish Branch of the World's Poultry Science AssociationCopenhagen pp. 65–74Google Scholar
Vestergaard, K. (1980) The regulation of dustbathing and other behaviour patterns in the layinghen: a Lorenzian approach. In: The Laying Hen and its Environment (Moss, R., Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp.101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K. (1982) Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K., Hogan, J.A. and Kruijt, J.P. (1990) The development of a behaviour system: dustbathing in the Burmese red junglefowl. I. The influence of the rearing environment on the organization of dustbathing. Behaviour 112: 35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Wachenfelt, E. (1993) Air contamination in poultry production systems, 1. Sweden. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare (Savory, C.J. and Hughes, B.O., Eds), Universities Federation for Animal WelfarePotters Bar pp. 97–109Google Scholar
Wegner, R.-M. (Editor), (1985) Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Poultry WelfareGerman Branch of the World's Poultry Science AssociationCelleGoogle Scholar
Wells, R.G. (1973) Stocking density and colony size for caged layers. Fourth European Poultry ConferenceLondon pp. 617–622Google Scholar
Widowski, T.M. and Duncan, I.J.H. (2000) Working for a dustbath are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 39–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood-Gush, D.G.M. (1972) Strain differences in response to sub-optimal stimuli in the fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, D.G.M. and Gilbert, A.B. (1964) The control of the nesting behaviour of the domestic hen. II. The role of the ovary. Animal Behaviour 12: 451–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, D.G.M. and Gilbert, A.B. (1973) Some hormones involved in the nesting behaviour of hens. Ainimal Behaviour 21: 98–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood-Gush, D.G.M. and Gilbert, A.B. (1975) The physiological basis of a behaviour pattern in the domestic hen. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 35: 261–276Google Scholar
Zayan, R. and Doyen, J. (1985) Spacing patterns of laying hens kept at different densities in battery cages. In: Social Space for Domestic Animals (Zayan, R., Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 37–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zayan, R., Doyen, J. and Duncan, I.J.H. (1983) Social and space requirements for hens in battery cages. In: Farm Animal Housing and Welfare (Baxter, S.H., Baxter, M.R. and Maccormack, J.A.C., Eds), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 67–90Google Scholar