Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:07:11.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of layers to ahemeral light cycles incorporating age at application and changes in effective photoperiod

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

M.M. Shanawany
M.M. Shanawany
Affiliation:
Institüt für Tierwissenschaften, Technischen Universität München, 8050 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The possible influence of age at change in cycle length and differences in effective photoperiod (Δp) on the response of layers to ahemeral light cycles have been examined. A brief account of the physiology of pattern of lay in the hen is given.

When an ahemeral light cycle is applied, mean rate of lay in relation to a normal 24-h cycle changes. The change in mean rate of lay depends upon the rate of ovarian follicular maturation of the individuals in the flock at the time of change to an ahemeral cycle. Early in lay, when rate of follicular maturation is rapid, changing to a long light cycle reduces rate of lay, whereas changing to a short cycle could increase rate of lay. As rate of follicular maturation declines with age, changing to a long cycle late in lay leads to an improvement in rate of lay. Based on published reports, a theoretical curve of the response to a 28-h cycle is given showing the significance of age at which application is made. From the available literature it appears that, provided Δp ≥ 0, response to ahemeral light cycles is not affected.

Keywords

Ageahemeraldomestic fowlegg productionlight cyclephotoperiod
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 156 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatti, B.M. and Morris, T.R. (1988) Model for the prediction of mean time of oviposition for hens kept in different light and dark cycles. British Poultry Science 29: 205–213Google Scholar
Biellier, H.V. and Ostman, O.W. (1960) Effect of varying day-length on time of oviposition in domestic fowl. Research Bulletin: Missouri Agriculture Experimental Station, 747Google Scholar
Blake, A.G. and Ranger, R.K. (1987) Changes in ring-necked pheasants' (Phasianus colchius) egg formation time, oviposition lag time and egg sequence length due to ahemeral light–dark cycles. Poultry Science 66: 231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, A.G., Balander, R., Flegal, C.J. and Ranger, R.K. (1987) Ahemeral light–dark cycles and egg production parameters in ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchius). Poultry Science 66: 258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.B. and Barnett, B.D. (1976) Ahemeral photoperiods for chicken hens. Poultry Science 55: 1183–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, F.J. (1987) Ovulation in the hen: neuroendocrine control. Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology 9: 96–136Google ScholarPubMed
Etches, R.J. (1984) Maturation of ovarian follicles. In: Reproductive Biology of Poultry (Eds. Cunningham, F.J., Lake, P.E. and Hewitt, D.), British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh, pp. 51–73Google Scholar
Etches, R.J. and Schoch, J.P. (1984) A mathematical representation of the ovulatory cycle of the domestic hen. British Poultry Science 25: 65–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzsimmons, R.C. and Newcombe, M. (1991) The effect of ahemeral light–dark cycles early in the laying cycle on egg production in White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science 70: 20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follett, B.K. and Davies, D.T. (1979) The endocrine control of ovulation in birds. In: Animal Reproduction (BARC Symposium in Agricultural Research), Wiley, New York, pp. 323–344Google Scholar
Foster, W.H. (1968) The effect of light–dark cycles of abnormal lengths upon egg production. British Poultry Science 9: 273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W.H. (1969) Egg production under 24-, 26- and 28-hour light–dark cycles. British Poultry Science 10: 273–279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, S., Morris, T.R. and Jennings, R.C. (1971) The use of non-24-hour cycles to manipulate egg weight in pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 27: 159Google Scholar
Hawes, R.O., Lakshmanan, N. and Kling, L.J. (1991) Effect of ahemeral light:dark cycles on egg production in early photo-stimulated brown-egg pullets. Poultry Science 70: 1481–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibaraki, K., Yoshida, S., Kumimatsu, Y. and Kojima, Y. (1985) Effect of 28-h ahemeral light–dark cycles on egg production and egg shell qualities of laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 22: 181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibaraki, K., Yoshida, S., Kumimatsu, Y. and Kojima, Y. (1988) Effect of 28-h ahemeral light–dark cycles on egg production and egg shell qualities of laying hens. II. Effect of 28-h ahemeral L–D cycle on egg quality at mature and aged stages. Japanese Poultry Science 25: 93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R., Morris, T.R. and Overfield, N.D. (1977) The effect of ahemeral light cycles upon shell quality with laying fowls over 70 weeks of age. ADAS Poultry Quarterly Journal 125: 41Google Scholar
Koelkebeck, K.W. and Biellier, H.V. (1986a) Effect of ahemeral light–dark cycles on production and egg quality of laying hens. Poultry Science 65: 874–880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koelkebeck, K.W. and Biellier, H.V. (1986b) Ahemeral light–dark cycles and intermittent photoperiod effects on laying hens. Poultry Science 65: 2002–2007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kojima, Y., Ashida, H., Kumimatsu, Y. and Ibaraki, K. (1986) Entrainment of oviposition under 28 hour ahemeral light–dark cycles in laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 23: 10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, Y., Itoh, M., Kumimatsu, Y. and Ibaraki, K. (1988) Entrainment of oviposition under 28 and 21 hour ahemeral light–dark cycles in laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 25: 312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacassgne, L. and Sauveur, B. (1973) Light-dark cycles of 26 and 28 hours and egg shell formation in the domestic hen. Animal Zootechnology (Annals de Zootechnie) 23: 103–109Google Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1985) Early application of conventional or ahemeral photoperiods in an attempt to improve egg size. Poultry Science 64: 2020–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1988) Significance of growing photoperiods and light stimulation at various ages for leghorn pullets subjected to regular or ahemeral photoperiods. Poultry Science 67: 391–398Google Scholar
Leeson, S., Summers, J.D. and Etches, R.J. (1979) Effect of a 28-h light–dark cycle on egg shell quality of end-of-lay birds. Poultry Science 58: 285–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, W. (1980) Lighting and nutrition as affecting maturity and subsequent performance. Paper presented at the summer meeting of WPSA (UK Branch) at Reading, July 1980Google Scholar
Morris, T.R. (1973) The effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production. Poultry Science 52: 423–445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R. (1978) The photoperiodic effect of ahemeral light–dark cycles which entrain circadian rhythms. British Poultry Science 19: 207–212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R. (1979) The influence of light on ovulation in domestic birds. In: Animal Reproduction (BARC Symposium in Agricultural Research), Wiley, New York, pp. 307–322Google Scholar
Naito, M., Komiyama, T. and Nirasawa, K. (1985) The effects of ahemeral light cycles on egg production and oviposition cycle in the domestic fowl. Bulletin of National Institute of Animal Industry (Japan) 43: 1–9Google Scholar
Nordstrom, J.O. (1982) Shell quality of eggs from hens exposed to 26- and 27-h light–dark cycles from 56 to 76 weeks of age. Poultry Science 61: 804–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J.O. and Ousterhout, L.E. (1983) Ahemeral light cycles and protein levels for older laying hens. Poultry Science 62: 525–531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimada, K. and Saito, N. (1989) Control of oviposition in poultry. Critical Reviews in Poultry Biology 2: 235–253Google Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1981) Sexual maturity and subsequent laying performance in the domestic female fowl. PhD Thesis, Reading UniversityGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1982) The effect of ahemeral light and dark cycles on the performance of laying pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 38: 120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1990) Ahemeral light cycles and egg quality. World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, P.J. (1980) Female reproduction. In: Avian Endocrinology (Eds. Epple, A. and Stetson, M.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 435–454Google Scholar
van Tienhoven, A. (1981) Neuroendocrinology of avian reproduction with special emphasis on the reproductive cycle of the fowl (Gallus domesticus). World's Poultry Science Journal 37: 156–176Google Scholar
van Tienhoven, A., Ostrander, C.E. and Gehle, M. (1984) Response of different commercial strains of laying hens to short total photoperiods in interrupted night experiments during days of 24 and 28 hours. Poultry Science 63: 2318–2330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, C.J., Rose, S.P. and Bampton, P.R. (1987) Production responses of laying hens to 28 h bright:dim cycles using different light intensity ratios and a 24 h temperature regimen. British Poultry Science 28: 207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S.C. and Cunningham, F.J. (1984) Endocrine control of ovulation cycle. In: Reproductive Biology of Poultry (Eds. Cunningham, F.J., Lake, P.E. and Hewitt, D.), British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh, pp. 29–51Google Scholar
Yannakopoulos, A. (1985) Effect of an ahemeral light cycle on yolk weight and relationship between egg weight and yolk weight late in the pullet year. Poultry Science 64: 1596–1598Google Scholar
Yannakopoulos, A.L. and Morris, T.R. (1979) Effect of light, vitamin D and dietary phosphorus on egg-shell quality late in the pullet laying year. British Poultry Science 20: 337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, A.H.T., Miyaki, T. and Imai, K. (1983) The effect of aging on the ovarian follicular growth in laying hens. Poultry Science 62: 670–674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zakaria, A.H.T., Mikayi, T. and Imai, K. (1984) The relationships of clutch length and egg position on ovarian follicular growth in laying hens. Poultry Science 63: 1250–1254Google Scholar
Zimmermann, N.G. and Nam, C.H. (1989) Temporary ahemeral lighting for increased egg size in maturing pullets. Poultry Science 68: 1624–1630Google Scholar