Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:21:55.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

K.C. Williams
K.C. Williams
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Queensland 4105, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Excluding disease, the single most important factor affecting the albumen quality of the freshly laid egg is the age of the bird that laid it. With advancing flock age, Haugh unit scores decrease and the variability of the scores increases. An induced pause in egg production is beneficial in largely restoring albumen quality in aging hens. Both strain differences and strain/age interaction effects in Haugh unit scores of fresh eggs have often been observed, but these are normally small and have little practical significance. Albumen quality of the egg is not greatly influenced by bird nutrition. Environment and housing, even heat stress, appear to have almost no direct effect on the albumen quality of the egg at oviposition.

When ambient temperatures are high, delays in egg collection and/or cooling increase the rate of Haugh unit score decline. The maintenance of albumen quality during egg storage is dependent on the eggs being cooled quickly following lay and subsequently being held at low temperatures, preferably down to, but not below, 0°C. Oiling of eggs within 24 h of lay is very effective in retarding deterioration of the albumen but does not replace the need for cool storage. Information on genetic effects on the albumen quality of stored eggs is equivocal, although there is general agreement that any effects are small and of little commercial significance. Of greater importance is the finding that within strains there can be great variation in Haugh unit scores and that strains laying white-shelled eggs are much less variable than those producing brown-shelled eggs.

Keywords

AgealbumeneggenvironmentHaugh unitqualitystorage
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 5 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belyavin, C.G. (1988) Egg quality as influenced by production systems. World's Poultry Science Journal 44: 65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, S. and Lipstein, B. (1962) Some characteristics of measures employed for determining the interior quality of chicken eggs. British Poultry Science 3: 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, A.W., Otte, A.W. and Norris, K.H. (1951) Recommended standards for scoring and measuring opened egg quality. Food Technology 5: 356–361Google Scholar
Buckley, D.J., St.Amour, G. and Fairfull, R.W. (1981) An improved electronic gauge for measuring egg albumen height. Poultry Science 60: 777–780Google Scholar
Coutts, J. and Wilson, G. (1986) In: Egg Quality Handbook, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 22–32Google Scholar
Cunningham, F.E., Cotterill, O.J. and Funk, E.M. (1960) The effect of season and age of bird. 1. On egg size, quality and yield. Poultry Science 39: 289–299Google Scholar
Daniel, M. and Balnave, D. (1981) Responses of laying hens to gradual and abrupt increases in ambient temperature and humidity. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 21: 189–195Google Scholar
Davis, B.M. and Stephenson, H. (1991) Egg quality under tropical conditions in north Queensland: 1. Surveys of quality on farms and at retail outlets. Food Australia 43 In pressGoogle Scholar
Decuypere, E., Huyghebaert, G. and Verheyen, G. (1987) Effect of induced moulting on egg quality. In: Egg Quality – Current Problems and Recent Advances (Eds. Wells, R. G. and Belyavin, C.G.), Butterworths, London, pp. 203–218Google Scholar
Fletcher, D.A., Orr, H.L., Snyder, E.S. and Nicholson, A.O. (1959) Effect of oiling, packaging materials and addition of CO2 on quality of shell eggs held in storage. Poultry Science, 38: 106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, D.L., Britton, W.M., Pesti, G.M., Rahn, A.P. and Savage, S.I. (1983) The relationship of layer flock age and egg weight on egg component yields and solids content. Poultry Science 62: 1800–1805Google Scholar
Fletcher, D.L., Britton, W.M., Rahn, A.P. and Savage, S.I. (1981) The influence of layer flock age on egg component yields and solids content. Poultry Science 60: 983–987Google Scholar
Fry, J.L., Moore, J.S. and O'Steen, A.W. (1965) Strain difference and initial quality relationships to rate of interior egg quality decline. Poultry Science 44: 649–652Google Scholar
Fry, J.L. and Newell, G.W. (1957) Management and holding conditions as they affect the interior quality of eggs. Poultry Science 36: 240–246Google Scholar
Hall, K.N. and Helbacka, N.V. (1959) Improving albumen quality. Poultry Science 38: 111–114Google Scholar
Haugh, R.R. (1937) The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. United States Egg Poultry Magazine 43: 552–555, 572–573Google Scholar
Heiman, V. and Wilhelm, L.A. (1937) Relationship between yolk index, percentage of firm white and albumen index. Journal of Agricultural Research 54: 551–557Google Scholar
Hill, A.T., Eissinger, R.C., Hamilton, D.M. and Patko, J. (1980) Sample sizes required for predicting albumen quality in stored eggs from eight commercial stocks. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60: 979–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A.T. and Hall, W. (1980) Effects of various combinations of oil spraying, washing, sanitizing, storage time, strain, and age of layer upon albumen quality changes in storage and minimum sample sizes required for their measurement. Poultry Science 59: 2237–2242Google Scholar
Hinton, H.R. (1968) Storage of eggs. In: Egg Quality: A Study of the Hen's Egg (Ed. Carter, T.C.), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 251–261Google Scholar
Hunton, P. (1987) Laboratory evaluations of egg quality. In: Egg Quality – Current Problems and Recent Advances (Eds. Wells, R.G. and Belyavin, C.G.), Butterworths, London, pp. 87–102Google Scholar
Jeffrey, F.P. (1941) Changes in pullet year albumen index as affected by age of bird. Poultry Science 20: 298–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L.S., Chang, C.H. and Wilson, S.P. (1978a) Interior egg quality: improvement by distillers' feeds and trace elements. Poultry Science 57: 648–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L.S., Maurice, D.V. and Murray, M.W. (1978b) Evidence for a new biological function of chromium. Federation Proceedings 37: 404 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Karunajeewa, H., Abu-Serewa, S. and Harris, P.A. (1989) Effects of an induced pause in egg production and supplementation of the diet with iron on egg shell colour, quality and performance of brown egg layers. British Poultry Science 30: 257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, M.G., Nordskog, A.W. and Forsythe, R.H. (1964) Variation among commercial strains of chickens in loss of egg albumen quality. Poultry Science 43: 38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, W.W., Nordskog, A.W., Tolman, H.S. and Forsythe, R.H. (1964) Egg composition as influenced by breeding, egg size, age and season. Poultry Science 43: 255–264Google Scholar
May, K.N. and Stadelman, W.J. (1960) Some factors affecting components of eggs from adult hens. Poultry Science 39: 560–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, L.K., Trantham, E.C., Hazelwood, C.F., Fanguy, R.C. and Gardner, F.A. (1980) Nuclear magnetic resonance study of egg quality deterioration: differences in thick and thin albumen. Poultry Science 59: 1640–1641Google Scholar
Monsey, J.B., Robinson, D.S., Miller, W.S. and Ellis, M. (1977) The effect of feeding magnesium-enriched diets on the quality of the albumen of stored eggs. British Journal of Nutrition 37: 35–44Google Scholar
Montgomery, R.H. and Stewart, D.A. (1973) A comparison of measured and estimated Haugh units with factors affecting their differences. British Poultry Science 14: 445–450Google Scholar
Naber, E.C. (1979) The effect of nutrition on the composition of eggs. Poultry Science 58: 518–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J.O. (1980) Albumen quality of eggs laid during moult induction. Poultry Science 59: 1711–1714Google Scholar
Overfield, N.D. (1970) Factors affecting egg quality – field observations. In: Factors Affecting Egg Grading (Eds. Freeman, B.M. and Gordon, R.F.) Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 29–51Google Scholar
Pandey, N.K., Mahapatra, C.M., Verma, S.S., Goyal, R.C. and Johari, D.C. (1984) Physical quality traits and components of egg from different strains of White Leghorn hens. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 19: 40–44Google Scholar
Povey, M.J.W. and Wilkinson, J.M. (1980) Application of ultrasonic pulse-echo techniques to egg albumen quality testing: a preliminary report. British Poultry Science 21: 489–495Google Scholar
Proudfoot, F.G. (1962) The decline of internal egg quality during storage at 30°F and 70°F among six strains of Leghorns reared in confinement and on range. Poultry Science 41: 98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.S. (1987) The chemical basis of albumen quality. In: Egg Quality – Current Problems and Recent Advances (Eds. Wells, R.G. and Belyavin, C.G.), Butterworths, London, pp. 179–191Google Scholar
Robinson, D. and Barram, K.M. (1991) Multiple short egg production cycles. In: Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 1991 (Ed. Farrell, D.J.), University of New England, Armidale, pp. 271–277Google Scholar
Romanoff, A.L. and Romanoff, A.J. (1949) Chapter 10: Preservation. In: The Avian Egg, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, pp. 653–768Google Scholar
Sauveur, B. and Picard, M. (1987) Environmental effects on egg quality. In: Egg Quality – Current Problems and Recent Advances (Eds. Wells, R.G. and Belyavin, C.G.), Butterworths, London, pp. 219–234Google Scholar
Sabrani, M. and Payne, C.G. (1978) Effect of oiling on internal quality of eggs stored at 28°C and 12°C. British Poultry Science 19: 567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, J.L., Arthur, J.A. and Williams, I.L. (1982) Adverse effect of dietary vanadium, contributed by dicalcium phosphate, on albumen quality. Poultry Science 61: 2112–2116Google Scholar
Shenstone, F.S. (1968) The gross composition, chemistry and physicochemical basis of organization of the yolk and white. In: Egg Quality: A Study of the Hen's Egg (Ed. Carter, T.C.), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 26–58Google Scholar
Spackman, D. (1987) The effects of disease on egg quality. In: Egg Quality – Current Problems and Recent Advances (Eds. Wells, R.G. and Belyavin, C.G.), Butterworths, London, pp. 255–282Google Scholar
Stadelman, W.J., Spencer, J.V., Sauter, E.A. and Waanen, M.V. (1957) Egg preferences of Spokane consumers. Poultry Science 36: 596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, H., Davis, B.M. and Shepherd, R.K. (1991) Egg quality under tropical conditions in north Queensland: 2. Effects of oiling and storage temperature on egg quality. Food Australia 43 In pressGoogle Scholar
Wakeling, D.E. (1977) Induced moulting – a review of the literature, current practice and areas for further research. World's Poultry Science Journal 33: 12–20Google Scholar
Waldroup, P.W. and Hazen, K.R. (1979) Examination of corn dried steep liquor concentrate and various feed additives as potential sources of a Haugh unit improvement factor for laying hens. Poultry Science 58: 580–586Google Scholar
Wells, R.G. (1968) The measurement of certain egg quality characteristics: a review. In: Egg Quality: A Study of the Hen's Egg (Ed. Carter, T.C.), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 207–249Google Scholar
Wesley, R.L. and Stadelman, W.J. (1959) Measurement of interior egg quality. Poultry Science 38: 474–481Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (1988) Egg oiling – an answer to Queensland's egg freshness problems. In: Proceedings of 1988 Poultry Information Exchange (Ed. Byrnes, R.V.), Poultry Information Exchange Organising Committee, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 109–115Google Scholar