Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T09:55:33.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Addressing Competitiveness Concerns of EU exporters with Industrial Policy: The Role of Innovation Support

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

Michael Jakob  and
Michael Mehling
Michael Jakob*
Affiliation:
Climate Transition Economics, Berlin, Germany
Michael Mehling
Affiliation:
Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA School of Law, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
*
Corresponding author: Michael Jakob; Email: mj@ct-economics.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the recent passage of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the free allocation of emission permits under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) that currently acts as a safeguard against emissions leakage and industrial relocation will progressively be phased out. Because the CBAM only covers imports, however, European goods exported into global markets stand to become more vulnerable to emissions leakage. Different policy options have been discussed to counter such export-related leakage, but they variously face concerns regarding their environmental, political, and legal implications. We describe and evaluate the three most important policy options based on their potential to reduce export-related leakage, support the net-zero transformation in Europe as well as globally, ensure conformity with international trade law, secure administrative feasibility, and foster political acceptance by affected trade partners. While no single option outperforms its alternatives on all criteria, our analysis identifies targeted innovation support as a promising option because it minimizes legal and political risks while also offering climate benefits beyond leakage protection for European industry. We then discuss the sectors that are most likely to require innovation support, the policy instruments that could serve to operationalize such support, and potential funding sources. We conclude with guiding principles for technology support measures, reflecting on the implications of the current surge in industrial policy within Europe and beyond.

Keywords

Carbon LeakageExportsCBAMInnovation
Type
Original Article
Information
World Trade Review , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Secretariat of the World Trade Organization

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antoci, A., Borghesi, S., Iannucci, G., and Sodini, M. (2022) ‘Free Allocation of Emission Permits to Reduce Carbon Leakage: An Evolutionary Approach’, in Jakob, M. (ed.), Handbook on Trade Policy and Climate Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 76–93. www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781839103230/9781839103230.00014.xmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASCM (1994) ‘Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’, 1869 UNTS 14. www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/24-scm.pdfGoogle Scholar
Beaufils, T., Ward, H., Jakob, M., and Wenz, L. (2023) ‘Assessing Different European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Implementations and Their Impact on Trade Partners’, Communications Earth & Environment 4(1), 131. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00788-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BCG (2022) ‘Transforming the Steel Industry May Be the Ultimate Climate Challenge’, www.bcg.com/publications/2022/steel-industry-carbon-emissions-challenge-solutions.Google Scholar
Bistline, J., Mehrotra, N., and Wolfram, C. (2023) ‘Economic Implications of the Climate Provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. doi:10.3386/w31267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branger, F. and Quirion, P. (2014) ‘Would Border Carbon Adjustments Prevent Carbon Leakage and Heavy Industry Competitiveness Losses? Insights from a Meta-Analysis of Recent Economic Studies’, Ecological Economics 99, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, W., Dippl, L., and Eichenseer, M. (2019) ‘Subsidizing Renewables as Part of Taking Leadership in International Climate Policy: The German Case’, Energy Policy 129, 765–773. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, J. (2022) ‘Empirical Evidence and Projections of Carbon Leakage: Some, but Not Too Much, Probably’, in Jakob, M. (ed.), Handbook on Trade Policy and Climate Change. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2014) Green Subsidies and the WTO. Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-7060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, N. (2023) ‘The Energy Transition, Protectionism and Transatlantic Relations’, Survival 65(2), 75–102. doi:10.1080/00396338.2023.2193101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criscuolo, C., Gonne, N., Kitazawa, K., and Lalanne, G.. (2022) ‘Are Industrial Policy Instruments Effective? A Review of the Evidence in OECD Countries’, 128. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/57b3dae2-en.pdf?expires=1691242997&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=97905EEAF27CACFD040A66DFDF52F54AGoogle Scholar
Criscuolo, C., Dechezleprêtre, A., and Lalanne, G. (2023) ‘Industrial Strategies for the Green Transition’, Sparking Europe's New Industrial Revolution. A Policy for Net Zero, Growth and Resilience. Simone Tagliapietra and Reinhilde Veugelers (eds). Blueprint Series 33. bruegel. www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/Bruegel%20Blueprint%2033%20030723.pdfGoogle Scholar
Crompton, P. and Lesourd, J.-B. (2008) ‘Economies of Scale in Global Iron-Making’, Resources Policy 33(2), 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, M.R., Karplus, V.J., Lewis, J.I., Nahm, J., and Wang, A. (2022) ‘Risks of Decoupling from China on Low-Carbon Technologies’, Science 377(6612), 1266–1269. doi:10.1126/science.abq5446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Commerce (2020) ‘Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the Federal Republic of Germany and Italy: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination’, www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/11/2020-27335/forged-steel-fluid-end-blocks-from-the-federal-republic-of-germany-final-affirmative-countervailingGoogle Scholar
ECJ (2011) ‘Air Transport Association of America v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change’, ECLI:EU:C:2011:864. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0366Google Scholar
European Commission (2019) ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal, COM(2019)640 Final’, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFINGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2020) ‘EU Green Deal (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism). Public Consultation: Summary Report’, Ares(2021)70541. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12228-EU-Green-Deal-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-/public-consultation_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2021a) ‘Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, SWD(2021) 643 Final’, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021SC0643Google Scholar
European Commission (2021b) ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, COM(2021)564 Final’, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021PC0564Google Scholar
European Parliament, and Council of the European Union (2023) ‘Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2023.130.01.0052.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AL%3A2023%3A130%3ATOCGoogle Scholar
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2024) ‘Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Establishing a Framework of Measures for Strengthening Europe's Net-Zero Technology Manufacturing Ecosystem and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724’, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401735.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2023) International Trade. International Trade. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/Google Scholar
Focus Economics (2023) ‘Steel (Europe) Prices’, www.focus-economics.com/commodities/base-metals/steel-europe/Google Scholar
Ghisetti, C. (2017) ‘Demand-Pull and Environmental Innovations: Estimating the Effects of Innovative Public Procurement’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 125, 178–187. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldthau, A. and Hughes, L. (2020) ‘Protect Global Supply Chains for Low-Carbon Technologies’, Nature 585(7823), 28–30. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02499-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartmann, J. (2013) ‘A Battle for the Skies: Applying the European Emissions Trading System to International Aviation’, Nordic Journal of International Law 82(2), 187–220. doi:10.1163/15718107-08202001.Google Scholar
Hausmann, R. and Ahuja, K.. (2023) ‘A More Globally Minded European Green Industrial Policy’, in Sparking Europe's New Industrial Revolution. A Policy for Net Zero, Growth and Resilience. Edited by Simone Tagliapietra and Reinhilde Veugelers. Blueprint Series 33. Bruegel. www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/Bruegel%20Blueprint%2033%20030723.pdfGoogle Scholar
Helveston, J.P., He, G., and Davidson, M.R. (2022) ‘Quantifying the Cost Savings of Global Solar Photovoltaic Supply Chains’, Nature 612(7938), 83–87. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05316-6.Google ScholarPubMed
Hermwille, L., Lechtenböhmer, S., Åhman, M., van Asselt, H., Bataille, C., Kronshage, S., Tönjes, A., et al. (2022) ‘A Climate Club to Decarbonize the Global Steel Industry’, Nature Climate Change 12(6), 494–96.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. and Manak, I. (2023) Rethinking International Rules on Subsidies. Council on Foreign Relations. www.cfr.org/report/rethinking-international-rules-subsidiesGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2022) ‘Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change’,Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., and Stavins, R.N. (2005) ‘A Tale of Two Market Failures: Technology and Environmental Policy’, Ecological Economics 54(2–3), 164–174. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, M. (2021a) ‘Climate Policy and International Trade – A Critical Appraisal of the Literature’, Energy Policy 156, 112399. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, M. (2021b) ‘Why Carbon Leakage Matters and What Can Be Done against It’, One Earth 4(5), 609–614. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.010.Google Scholar
Jakob, M. (2023) ‘The Political Economy of Carbon Border Adjustment in the EU’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 39(1), 134–146. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grac044.Google Scholar
Jakob, M., Afionis, S., Åhman, M., Antoci, A., Arens, M., Ascensão, F., van Asselt, H., et al. (2022) ‘How Trade Policy Can Support the Climate Agenda’, Science 376(6600), 1401–1403. doi:10.1126/science.abo4207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joltreau, E., and Sommerfeld, K. (2019) ‘Why Does Emissions Trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Not Affect Firms’ Competitiveness? Empirical Findings from the Literature’, Climate Policy 19(4), 453–471. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köveker, T., Chiappinelli, O., Kröger, M., Lösch, O., Neuhoff, K., Richstein, J.C., and Sun, X. (2023) ‘Green Premiums Are a Challenge and an Opportunity for Climate Policy Design’, Nature Climate Change 13(7), 592–595. doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01689-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehner, A.-K., Jakob, M., and Flachsland, C. (2022) ‘German Stakeholder Perceptions of an EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, Environmental Research Letters 17(12), 124007. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac9f23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, A., Mehling, M.A., Cosbey, A., and Maratou, A.. (2022) ‘Addressing Exports in the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, ERCST Report, https://ercst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/20220318-Summary-for-Policymakers.pdfGoogle Scholar
Marcu, A.C., Mehling, M.A., and Cosbey, A.J. (2022) Border Carbon Adjustments in the EU: Treatment of Exports in the EU CBAM. Brussels: European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition (ERCST). https://ercst.org/treatment_of_exports_in_the_eu_cbam/Google Scholar
Martin, R., Muûls, M., de Preux, L.B., and Wagner, U.J. (2014) ‘On the Empirical Content of Carbon Leakage Criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme’, Ecological Economics 105, 78–88. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010.Google Scholar
McNamara, K.R. (2023) ‘Transforming Europe? The EU's Industrial Policy and Geopolitical Turn’, Journal of European Public Policy July, 1–26. doi:10.1080/13501763.2023.2230247.Google Scholar
Mehling, M.A., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., and Verkuijl, C. (2019) ‘Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action’, American Journal of International Law 113(3), 433–481. doi:10.1017/ajil.2019.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minx, J.C., Lamb, W.F., Callaghan, M.W., Fuss, S., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., et al. (2018) ‘Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis’, Environmental Research Letters 13(6), 063001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monjon, S. and Quirion, P. (2011) ‘A Border Adjustment for the EU ETS: Reconciling WTO Rules and Capacity to Tackle Carbon Leakage’, Climate Policy 11(5), 1212–1225. doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.601907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemet, G.F. (2019) How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-Carbon Innovation. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, L.J., Bauer, F., Åhman, M., Andersson, F.N.G., Bataille, C., Can, S.D.L.R.D., Ericsson, K., et al. (2021) ‘An Industrial Policy Framework for Transforming Energy and Emissions Intensive Industries towards Zero Emissions’, Climate Policy 21(8), 1053–1065. doi:10.1080/14693062.2021.1957665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richstein, J.C. and Neuhoff, K. (2022) ‘Carbon Contracts-for-Difference: How to de-Risk Innovative Investments for a Low-Carbon Industry?’, iScience 25(8), 104700. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrik, D. (2014) ‘Green Industrial Policy’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30(3), 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartor, O. and Bataille, C.. (2019) ‘Decarbonising Basic Materials in Europe: How Carbon Contracts-for-Difference Could Help Bring Breakthrough Technologies to Market’, IDDRI Report, www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Etude/201910-ST0619-CCfDs_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sartor, O., Cosbey, A., and Shawkat, A. (2022) Getting the Transition to CBAM Right: Finding Pragmatic Solutions to Key Implementation Questions, Agora Industry Report. www.agora-industry.org/publications/getting-the-transition-to-cbam-right.Google Scholar
Schütze, F. and Stede, J. (2021) ‘The EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy and Its Contribution to Climate Neutrality’, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 1–33. doi:10.1080/20430795.2021.2006129.Google Scholar
Springmann, M. (2013) ‘Carbon Tariffs for Financing Clean Development’, Climate Policy 13(1), 20–42. doi:10.1080/14693062.2012.691223.Google Scholar
Staub-Kaminski, I., Zimmer, A., Jakob, M., and Marschinski, R. (2014) ‘Climate Policy in Practice: A Typology of Obstacles and Implications for Integrated Assessment Modeling’, Climate Change Economics 5(1). www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2010007814400041?src=recsys&CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, J.C. and Jakob, M. (2018) ‘The Role of Financing Cost and De-Risking Strategies for Clean Energy Investment’, International Economics. doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2018.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliapietra, S., Trasi, C., and Veugelers, R. (2023) ‘Europe's Green Industrial Policy’, in Tagliapietra, S. and Veugelers, R. (eds.), Sparking Europe's New Industrial Revolution: A Policy for Net Zero, Growth and Resilience. Blueprint Series 33. Bruegel. www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/Bruegel%20Blueprint%2033%20030723.pdfGoogle Scholar
Terzi, A. (2023) ‘Green Industrial Policy: The Necessary Evil to Avoid a Climate Catastrophe’, in Tagliapietra, S. and Veugelers, R. (eds.), Sparking Europe's New Industrial Revolution. A Policy for Net Zero, Growth and Resilience. Blueprint Series 33. Bruegel. www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/Bruegel%20Blueprint%2033%20030723.pdfGoogle Scholar
Verde, S.F. (2020) ‘The Impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage: The Econometric Evidence’, Journal of Economic Surveys 34(2), 320–343. doi:10.1111/joes.12356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, V., Åhman, M., and Nilsson, L.J. (2018) ‘Assessment of Hydrogen Direct Reduction for Fossil-Free Steelmaking’, Journal of Cleaner Production 203, 736–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279.Google Scholar
Vogl, V., Olsson, O., and Nykvist, B. (2021) ‘Phasing out the Blast Furnace to Meet Global Climate Targets’, Joule 5(10), 2646–2662. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, N. (2022) ‘Transforming the Steel Industry May Be the Ultimate Climate Challenge’, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), www.bcg.com/publications/2022/steel-industry-carbon-emissions-challenge-solutions.Google Scholar
World Bank (2023) State and Trends of Carbon Pricing. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/items/58f2a409-9bb7-4ee6-899d-be47835c838fGoogle Scholar