Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:06:38.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The safeguards mess: a critique of WTO jurisprudence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2004

ALAN O. SYKES
Affiliation:
Frank and Bernice Greenberg Professor of Law, University of Chicago

Abstract

The creation of the WTO revived the use of ‘safeguard’ measures to protect troubled industries against surges in import competition. Many of these measures have now been challenged in the WTO dispute resolution process, and in each case the process has found the challenged measure to be a violation of WTO law. This paper examines the WTO rules on safeguards from an economic perspective. Among other things, it argues that the textual preconditions for the use of safeguards in the treaty text are incoherent, and that the Appellate Body has compounded the problem through a series of dubious and unhelpful rulings. The result is a situation in which nations cannot use safeguards without facing a near certainty that they will be found invalid. Those who believe that safeguard measures are wasteful protectionism may welcome these developments, but it is by no means clear that the trading system will benefit in the long run.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Alan O. Sykes

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)