Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:43:39.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Power of Dance and Its Social and Political Uses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Anca Giurchescu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Elaborating upon the social aspects of dance (or dancing), makes reference to its most general and comprehensive features, because dance is in essence a particular form of social interaction. Even if dance can be artificially separated from its social context and considered solely in its physical features as an independent artistic means of expression, the social component is implicit to the dancing person as an individual and as a member of a socio-cultural community. From this perspective dance structure may be considered as a culturally determined “program” where social, historical and environmental factors interlock with the physical, psychological and mental features of the individual (Giurchescu 1984: 35). Considered as a psychosomatic entity, the dancer is the “soul and body” of dance. He or she is the dance.

Type
Articles
Information
Yearbook for Traditional Music , Volume 33 , 2001 , pp. 109 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Barth, Frederik 1969 Ethnic groups and boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Blacking, John 1984 Dance as cultural system and human capability: An anthropological perspective. In Dance a multicultural perspective. Report of the third study of dance conference, ed. Adshead, J., 4–21. Guilford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Niculae 1983 Conceptul de text folcloric (The concept of folklore text). In Revista de etnografie şi folclor 28(1): 38–45. Bucureşti: Academia RSR.Google Scholar
Dabrowska, G. and Petermann, K., eds 1983 Studien zur Struktur- und Formanalyse des Volkstanzes (Studies on the folk dance structure and form analysis). In Analyse und Klassifikation von Volkstänzen (Analysis and classification of folk dances), 9–55. Krakow: PWM.Google Scholar
Dubinskas, Frank A. 1984 The politics of tradition: Two eras of organized “folklore” performing in Croatia. Rresearch paper presented at the State and Folklore Conference, sponsored by the American Council of Learned Societies, Rockefeller Foundation, IREX), Bellagio, Italy.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca 1984 European perspectives in structural analysis of dance. In Dance a multicultural perspective. Report of the third study of dance conference, ed. Adshead, J., 33–48. Guilford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca 1986 Power and charm. Interaction of adolescent men and women in traditional settings of Transylvania. Yearbook for Traditional Music 18: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca 1987 The national festival “Song to Romania”: Manipulation of symbols in the political discourse. In Symbols of power. The aesthetics of political legitimation in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, ed. Arvidsson, C. and Bomqvist, L., 163–171. Stockholm: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca 1989 A question of method: Contextual analysis of dancing at the Vlach Hora in Denmark. In The dance event: A complex cultural phenomenon, ed. L. Torp 34-43. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca 1990 The use of traditional symbols for recasting the present: A case study of tourism in Rumania. In Dance Studies, ed. Lange, R., 47–63. Jersey, C. I.: Centre for Dance Studies.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca 1992 A comparative analysis between the cărluş of the Danube Plain and the cărluşerul of Transylvania (Romania). Studia Musicologica 34: 31–44. Budapest: Akademia Kiado.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A. J. 1975 Despre sens. Eseuri semiotice (About sense. Semiotic essays). Bucureşti: Univers. First edition Du sens, Paris: Seuil, 1970).Google Scholar
Hanna, Judith Lynne 1979 To dance is human. A theory of nonverbal communication. Austin, London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne 1972 Method and theory in analyzing dance structure with an analysis of Tongan dance. Ethnomusicology 16(2): 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Suzanne K. 1979 Feeling and form. A theory of art developed from Philosophy in a New Key. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. First edition 1953.Google Scholar
Mesnil, Marianne 1997 Etnologul, între şarpe şi balaur (The ethnologist between the snake and the dragon). Bucuresti: Edition Paideia (The collection of Cultural Anthropology).Google Scholar
Loutzaki, I., ed. 1994 Dance and its sociopolitical aspects and Dance and costume. Proceedings. 17th Symposium of the Study Group on Ethnochoreology, 1992. Nafplion: Peloponnesian Folklore Foundation.Google Scholar
Report of the IFMC Study Group for Folk Dance Terminology, 1972Google Scholar
Loutzaki, I. 1974 Foundation for the analysis of the structure and form of folk dance: A syllabus. Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council 6: 115–135.Google Scholar
Royce, Anya Peterson 1982 Ethnic identity: Strategies of diversity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Siegfried J. 1973 Texttheorie. Probleme einer Linguistik der Sprachlichen Kommunikation. (The text theory. Problems of a linguistics of verbal communication.) ed. Fink, Wilhem. München: Uni-Taschenbücher.Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann 1978 Lotman: The dialectic of a semiotician. In The Sign. Semiotics Around the World, eds R.W. Bailey, L. Mateika, P. Steiner, No 9: 194–206. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Torp, Lisbet 1986 Hip hop dances. Their adoption and function among boys in Denmark from 1983-84. Yearbook for Traditional Music 18:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max 1977 On nationalism, ethnicity and race. Race, ethnicity and social change, ed. Stone, J. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Winner, Irene Portis and Winner, Thomas G. 1976 The semiotics of cultural texts. Semiotica. Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar