Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:08:32.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Writing A Dance: Epistemology for Dance Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Extract

Over several years the authors of this article have had intensive discussions to find common ground in the topic they both specialize in: dance. Egil Bakka is a Norwegian ethnochoreologist, specializing in Nordic traditional dance/folk dance; Gediminas Karoblis is a Lithuanian philosopher, specializing in phenomenology and ballroom dancing. Our starting point was a philosophical question about the notion of dance knowledge and a shared worry about the empirical basis for many academic works on dance that other colleagues have also pointed to (Hoerburger 1959; Lange 1983; Adshead-Lansdale 1994; Grau 1998; Farnell 1999; Fügedi 2003). Bakka then brought up the widespread reservation against the use of film/video for the documentation and analysis of dance. We continued with a wish to clarify to ourselves the epistemological basis for research in dance, and somewhere along the way we started writing this article. We experienced that a dialogue in which methodological issues in dance research were confronted with philosophical scrutiny brought about a number of interesting perspectives. We hope that our exercise may be of interest to a broader audience. The aim is to explore how our different disciplinary points of departure—philosophy and ethnochoreology—can be brought to interact in creating a deeper understanding of our topic, rather than comparing the disciplines or discussing their differences.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 By The International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adshead-Lansdale, Janet 1994Dance Analysis in Performance.” Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 12/2:1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Folklore Society 1974 “Proceedings of the Annual Business Meeting of the American Folklore Society.” The Journal of American Folklore 87/Supplement: 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jack 1983Idealists, Materialists and the Thirty-two Fouettés.” In Copeland and Cohen 1983:410–20.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. 1978 Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakka, Egil 1970 Danse, danse, lett ut på foten, folkedansar og songdansar. Oslo: Noregs boklag.Google Scholar
1981Folk Dance Research in Norway.” Dance Studies 5:22–17.Google Scholar
1991The Centre of the Norwegian Council for Folk Music and Folk Dance.” Dance Research Journal 23/2 (Fall): 5455.Google Scholar
1994Heir, User, or Researcher: Basic Attitudes within the Norwegian Revival Movement.” In Proceedings of the 17th Symposium of the Study Group on Ethnochoreology: Dance and Its Socio-political Aspects; Dance and Costume, ed. Alexandra Doumas and Irene Loutzaki, 117–26. Nafplion: Peloponisiako Laografiko Idrima.Google Scholar
1999Or Shortly They Would Be Lost Forever: Documenting for Revival and Research.” In Buckland 1999:7181.Google Scholar
2001Voices of the Revival.” In Proceedings, 21st Symposium of the ICTM Study Group on Ethnochoreology, 2000, ed. Elsie Ivancich Dunin and Tvrtko Zebec, 138–42. Korcula: ICTM Study Group Ethnochoreology and Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research.Google Scholar
2005Dance Paradigms: Movement Analysis and Dance Studies.” In Dance and Society: Dancer as a Cultural Performer, ed. Elsie Ivancich Dunin, Anne von Bibra Wharton, and László Felföldi, 7280. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bakka, Egil, Aksdal, Bjørn, and Flem, Erling 1995 Springar and Pols; Variation, Dialect and Age: Pilot Project on the Methodology for Determining Traditions Structures and Historical Layering of Old Norwegian Couple Dances. Trondheim: Rff Center, Rådet for folkemusikk og folkedans.Google Scholar
Bakka, Egil, Frogner, Liv Jorunn, Kjørstad, Magne, Bergstøl, Målfrid Blaavarp, Kollandsrud, Gro, and Lislien, Jan 1987Dansar frå Numedal: Utkast til nedteikningar.” Unpublished manuscript. Rådet for folkemusikk og folkedans, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Bakka, Egil, Moen, Ruth A., and Sørstrønen, Berta n.d. “Pariserpolka frå Sauda.” Unpublished manuscript. The Norwegian Centre for Traditional Music and Dance, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L. 1990Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19:5988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1988 Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Buckland, Theresa Jill 1999 Ed. Dance in the Field. Theory Methods and Issues in Dance Ethnography. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carter, Alexandra 1998 Ed. Routledge Dance Studies Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Copeland, Roger, and Cohen, Marshall 1983 Ed. What Is Dance? Readings in Theory and Criticism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copleston, Frederick C. 1990 A History of Medieval Philosophy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, Arlene 1994-95 “A Critic at Bay, Discussing the Undiscussable.” The New Yorker (26 December 1994): 54–56; (2 January 1995): 5860.Google Scholar
Dale, J. A., Hyatt, Janyce, and Hollerman, Jeff 2007The Neuroscience of Dance and the Dance of Neuroscience: Defining a Path of Inquiry.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 41/3:89110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Ann 1988Movement Analysis: Piecing Together the Puzzle.” The Drama Review 32/4:4052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1986 Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Orig. pub. 1969)Google Scholar
2001Are We Explaining Consciousness Yet?Cognition 79:221–37.Google Scholar
2003Who's on First? Heterophenomenology Explained.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 9–10/10:1930.Google Scholar
2007Heterophenomenology Reconsidered.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6/1:247–70.Google Scholar
Depraz, Natalie, and Cosmelli, Diego 2003Empathy and Openness: Practices of Intersubjectivity at the Core of the Science of Consciousness.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29:163203.Google Scholar
Depraz, Natalie, Vermersch, Pierre, and Varela, Charles 2002 On Becoming Aware: A Pragmatics of Experiencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1973 Speech and Phenomena: And Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
1984 Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dils, Ann, and Crosby, Jill F. 2001Dialogue in Dance Studies Research.” Dance Research Journal 33/1:6281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnell, Brenda M. 1999Moving Bodies, Acting Selves.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28:341–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felföldi, László 1999Folk Dance Research in Hungary: Relation among Theory, Fieldwork, and the Archive.” In Buckland 1999:5570.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul 1975 Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: NLB.Google Scholar
János, Fügedi 1999Springs in Traditional Dance: An Analysis and Classification.” Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 40/13:159–88.Google Scholar
2003Movement Cognition and Dance Notation.” Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44/34:393410.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1960 Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun, and Zahavi, Dan 2008 The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gere, David 2004 How to Make Dances in an Epidemic: Tracking Choreography in the Age of AIDS. Madison, USA: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca, and Torp, Lisbet 1991Theory and Methods in Dance Research: A European Approach to the Holistic Study of Dance.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 23:110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, Georgiana, and Bakka, Egil 2007 “Constructing Dance Knowledge in the Field: Bridging the Gap between Realisation and Concept.” In Re-thinking Practice and Theory; Proceedings Thirtieth Annual Conference, Society for Dance History Scholars, Paris, 21–24 June 2007, comp. Ann Cooper Albright, Dena Davida, and Sarah Davies Cordova, 93–97. Co-sponsored with CORD.Google Scholar
2009Intangible Cultural Heritage: Agency and/or Critical Distance.” In Transmitting Dance as Cultural Heritage and Dance and Religion; Proceedings of the 25th Symposium of the ICTM Study Group on Ethnochoreology, ed. Mohd Anis Md Nor, Elsie Ivancich Dunin, and Anna von Bibra Wharton, 1521. Kuala Lumpur: Cultural Centre University of Malaya, ICTM Study Group on Ethnochoreology.Google Scholar
Gosselin, Mia 1990 Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism: Ontological and Epistemological Implications of the Work of W. V. O. Quine and of N. Goodman. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, Andrée 1998Myths of Origin.” In Carter 1998:197202.Google Scholar
Grau, Andrée, and Wierre-Gore, Georgiana 2005 Anthropologie de la danse: Genèse et construction d'une discipline. Patin, France: Centre national de la danse.Google Scholar
Guest, Ann Hutchinson 2000 “Is Authenticity to Be Had?” In Preservation Politics: Dance Revived, Reconstructed, Remade; Proceedings from the Conference at the University of Surrey Roehampton, November 8–9, 1997, ed. Stephanie Jordan, 6571. London: Dance Books.Google Scholar
Hanna, Judith L. 2002Lost Dance Research, Found New Hubris.” Dance Research Journal 34/1:710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, Peggy 1969Dance in Nigeria.” Ethnomusicology 13/2:280–95.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1993 Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag. (Orig. pub. 1927)Google Scholar
Hoerburger, Felix 1959The Study of Folk Dance and the Need for a Uniform Method of Notation.” Journal of the International Folk Music Council 11:7173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer 2000Personal and Sub-personal: A Defence of Dennett's Early Distinction.” Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 3/1:624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes-Freeland, Felicia 1999Dance on Film: Strategy and Serendipity.” In Buckland 1999:111–22.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1991 Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. 2nd ed. reprint. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1950, ed. Stephan Strasser; 2nd ed. 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isachsen, Janny 1886 Lommebog for dansende: Til støtte for erindringen ved menuet, française, lanciers, fandango med flere af de mest brugelige nutidsdandse: Samt anvisning til nogle cottillontoure. Kristiania: Cammermeyer.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne L. 1972Method and Theory in Analyzing Dance Structure with an Analysis of Tongan Dance.” Ethnomusicology 16/2:173217. 1999 “The Mystique of Fieldwork.” In Buckland 1999:1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001Dance and the Concept of Style.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 33:4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karoblis, Gediminas 2007aControlling Gaze, Chess Play and Seduction in Dance: Phenomenological Analysis of the Natural Attitude of the Body in Modern Ballroom Dance.” Janus Head 9/2:329–43. See also http://www.janushead.org/9-2/Karoblis.pdf (accessed 15 July 2010).Google Scholar
2007bThe Question Concerning Dance Technique.” In Phenomenology 2005, Volume 4: Selected Essays from Northern Europe, ed. Hans Rainer Sepp and Ion Copoeru, 363–98. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
2010Dance.” In Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics, ed. Hans Rainer Sepp and Lester Embree, 6770. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kozel, Susan 2007 Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Roderyk 1983Anthropology and Dance Scholarship.” Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 1/1:108–18.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve 1979 Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Levin, David M. 1983Philosophers and the Dance.” In Copeland and Cohen 1983:8594.Google Scholar
Marbach, Eduard 2007No Heterophenomenology without Autophenomenology: Variations on a Theme of Mine.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6:7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1964 The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. Ed. James M. Edie. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Orig. pub. in French)Google Scholar
1968 The Visible and the Invisible, Followed by Working Notes. Ed. Claude Lefort. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Orig. pub. in French, 1964)Google Scholar
1973 The Prose of the World. Ed. Claude Lefort. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Orig. pub. in French, 1969)Google Scholar
1996 Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge. (Orig. pub. in French, 1945; in English, 1962).Google Scholar
Morphy, Howard 1994The Interpretation of Ritual: Reflections from Film on Anthropological Practice.” Man 29/1:117–46.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1986 The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nahachewsky, Andriy 1995Participatory and Presentational Dance as Ethnochoreological Categories.” Dance Research Journal 27/1:115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overgaard, Morten 2004On the Naturalising of Phenomenology.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3/4:365–79.Google Scholar
Parviainen, Jaana 2006Towards a Phenomenological Method in the Body's Movement Analysis.” In Finnish Dance Research at the Crossroads: Practical and Theoretical Challenges, ed. Päivi K. Pakkanen and Aino Sarje, 136–47. Helsinki: Arts Council of Finland.Google Scholar
Reed, Susan A. 1998The Politics and Poetics of Dance.” Annual Review of Anthropology 27:503–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Timothy 1997Toward a Mediation of Field Methods and Field Experience in Ethnomusicology.” In Shadows in the Field: New Perspectives for Fieldwork in Ethnomusicology, ed. Gregory F. Barz and Timothy J. Cooley, 4261. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothfield, Philipa 2005Differentiating Phenomenology and Dance.” Topoi 24/1:4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royce, Anya P. 2002 The Anthropology of Dance. Alton: Dance Books.Google Scholar
Said, Edward 1978 Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de 2006 Writings in General Linguistics. Ed. Matthew Pires and Carol Sanders. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Orig. pub. in French, 1916)Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine 1979 The Phenomenology of Dance. London: Dance books.Google Scholar
Sklar, Deidre 1991On Dance Ethnography.” Dance Research Journal 23/1:610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparti, Barbara, and Adshead-Lansdale, Janet 1996Dance History: Current Methodologies.” Dance Research Journal 28/1:36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, George 1989 Real Presences: Is There Anything in What We Say? London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php?pg=00006 (accessed 16 July 2010).Google Scholar
Van Zile, Judy 1985What Is the Dance? Implications for Dance Notation.” Dance Research Journal 17/2:4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999Capturing the Dance: Why and How.” In Buckland 1999:8599.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco, and Shear, Jonathan 1999First-person Methodologies: What, Why, How.” In The View from Within: First-Person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness, ed. Francisco Varela and Jonathan Shear, 114. London: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Vermersch, Pierre 1994 L'entretien d'explicitation. Paris: ESF.Google Scholar
Wiley, Hannah C. 1987 “A New Model for Teaching Saut de Basque. Dance Research Journal 19/2:913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1958 Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Youngerman, Suzanne 1975Method and Theory in Dance Research. An Anthropological Approach.” Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council 7:116–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan 2001 Husserl and Transcendental Inter subjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique. Trans. Elizabeth A. Behnke. Athens, USA: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar