Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:07:04.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Once Again: On the Concept of “Second Existence Folk Dance”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Extract

Many early western dance historians, influenced by romanticism, never really thought about “folk” dance changing as a historical entity. Since they imagined it connected to the original and pure national spirit of a people, they often assumed that such a dance appeared right from the birth of that people itself, and that it is (or should be) changeless. Dance traditions generally continue on among the peasants as archaic remnants of the olden days (or in some cases, perhaps, they simply become extinct). One could represent this history on a two-dimensional timeline (Figure 1), drawing an arrow to symbolize the dance tradition as it progresses from left to right across time. A ball or node in the line could indicate a specific moment in the dance tradition's history, a documented performance for example.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Clifford, James, and Marcus, George E., eds 1986 Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, John Jr. and Collier, Malcolm. 1986 Visual anthropology: photography as a research method. Second edition. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Dewalt, Kathleen M., Dewalt, Billie R., and Wayland, Coral B. 1998 Participant observation. In Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, ed. Bernard, H. Russell, 259–99. Walnut Creek, Callifornia: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Dommett, Roy 1982 The Cotswold morris in the twentieth century. Traditional Dance 1:5992.Google Scholar
Dunin, Elsie Ivancich 1988 “Salonsko Kolo” as cultural identity in a Chilean Yugoslav community (1917-1986). In Narodna Umjetnost, Special Issue 2, 109–22. Zagreb: Institute of Folklore Research.Google Scholar
Forrest, John 1984 Morris and matachin: A study in comparative choreography. Sheffield, England: CECTAL.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Pauline 1994 Morris: An “English male dance tradition”. In Ethnicity in the mainstream: Three studies of English Canadian culture in Ontario, 64125. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Judith Lynne 1987 [1979] To dance is human: A theory of nonverbal communication. Second edition. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Harasymczuk, Roman 1939 Tance huculskie. In Prace etnograficzne 5. L'viv: Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze.Google Scholar
Hoerburger, Felix 1965 Folk dance survey. International Folk Music Journal 17: 78.Google Scholar
Hoerburger, Felix 1968 Once again: On the concept of “folk dance”. Journal of the International Folk Music Council 20: 30–1.Google Scholar
Kealiinohomoku, Joann Wheeler 1972 Folk dance. In Folklore and folklife: An introduction, ed. Dorson, Richard M., 381404. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nahachewsky, Andriy 1985 First existence folk dance forms among Ukrainians in Smoky Lake, Alberta and Swan Plain, Saskatchewan. Master's thesis. University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Nahachewsky, Andriy 1991 The kolomyika: Change and diversity in Canadian Ukrainian folk dance. Doctoral dissertation. University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Sharp, Cecil J. and Karpeles, Maud 1918 The country dance book, part 5. London: Novello.Google Scholar
Townsend, A.D 1988 Cecil James Sharp as collector and editor of traditional dance. Traditional Dance 5/6: 5376.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, John 1988 Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar