Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:51:18.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collection and in vitro maturation of Mazama gouazoubira (brown brocket deer) oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2021

Luciana Diniz Rola Open the ORCID record for Luciana Diniz Rola [Opens in a new window] ,
Eveline dos Santos Zanetti ,
Maite del Collado ,
Ellen de Fátima Carvalho Peroni  and
José Maurício Barbanti Duarte
Luciana Diniz Rola*
Affiliation:
NUPECCE - Núcleo de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cervídeos, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil Departamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal da Paraíba,Areia, PB, Brazil
Eveline dos Santos Zanetti
Affiliation:
NUPECCE - Núcleo de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cervídeos, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
Maite del Collado
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
Ellen de Fátima Carvalho Peroni
Affiliation:
NUPECCE - Núcleo de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cervídeos, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
José Maurício Barbanti Duarte
Affiliation:
NUPECCE - Núcleo de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cervídeos, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Luciana D. Rola. Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Rodovia PB 079 - Km 12, Areia, PB, CEP: 58.397-000, Brazil. Tel: +55 83 3362-1700. E-mail: lucianadinizr@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In vitro production of embryos has gained prominence as a tool for use in wildlife conservation programmes in situ and ex situ. However, the development of this technique depends on steps that include ovarian stimulation, collection and oocyte maturation. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of an ovarian stimulation protocol for follicular aspiration, the efficiency of videolaparoscopy for follicular aspiration and test a medium for in vitro oocyte maturation for the species Mazama gouazoubira. Five females were submitted to repeated ovarian stimulation (hormone protocol using controlled internal drug release), and estradiol benzoate on D0 and eight injections of follicle-stimulating hormone, once every 12 h, from D4 onwards at 30-day intervals. Fourteen surgical procedures were performed in superstimulated females, resulting in the collection of 94 oocytes and an average of 17.1 ± 9.1 follicles observed, 13.5 ± 6.6 follicles aspirated and 7.2 ± 3.7 oocytes collected per surgery. After collection, the oocytes were submitted to in vitro maturation for 24 h and stained with Hoechst 33342 dye to evaluate their nuclear status; 64.5% of the oocytes reached MII and 16.1% were spontaneously activated by parthenogenesis. The nuclear status of oocytes that did not undergo in vitro maturation was evaluated; 80.9% were found to be immature.

Keywords

Assisted reproductive technologiesDeerFSHLaparoscopic ovum pick-upWild animals
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 216 - 222
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdoon, ASS, Kandil, OM, Zeng, S-M and Cui, M (2011). Mitochondrial distribution, ATP-GSH contents, calcium [Ca2+] oscillation during in vitro maturation of dromedary camel oocytes. Theriogenology 76, 1207–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdullah, R, Liow, S, Rahman, A, Chan, W, Wan-Khadijah, W and Ng, S (2008). Prolonging the interval from ovarian hyperstimulation to laparoscopic ovum pick-up improves oocyte yield, quality, and developmental competence in goats. Theriogenology 70, 765–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abreu, CO (2006). Efeito da vitamina E na criopreservação de sêmen de veado-bororó-do-sul (Mazama nana). [Doctoral dissertation.] Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, p. 57.Google Scholar
Alberio, R, Echegoyen, E, Olivera, J, Roche, A, Alabart, J, Fernandez-Arias, A and Folch, J (2001). Performance in an OPU program of FSH stimulated and non stimulated Ramanov and Rasa Aragonesa ewe breeds. Theriogenology 55, 509.Google Scholar
Alberio, R, Olivera, J, Roche, A, Alabart, J and Folch, J (2002). Performance of a modified ovum pick-up system using three different FSH stimulation protocols in ewes. Small Rumin Res 46, 81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertini, DF, Sanfins, A and Combelles, CM (2003). Origins and manifestations of oocyte maturation competencies. Reprod Biomed Online 6, 410–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, M, Anel, L, Anel, E, Rodríguez, C, Kaabi, M, Boixo, J, Paz, P and Olmedo, J (1999). Efficiency of laparoscopic follicular aspiration in sheep. Theriogenology 51, 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argo, CM, Jabbour, H, Goddard, P, Webb, R and Loudon, A (1994). Superovulation in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and Père David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus), and fertilization rates following artificial insemination with Père David’s deer semen. J Reprod Fertil 100, 629–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, G, Jabbour, H, Thompson, J, Tervit, H and Morrow, C (1995). Superovulation of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) and fallow deer (Dama dama): incidence of ovulation and changes in plasma hormone concentrations during the pre-ovulatory period in relation to ova recovery and fertilisation. Anim Reprod Sci 38, 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, G, O’Neill, K, Scott, I, Mockett, B and Fisher, M (2000). Genetic influences on reproduction of female red deer (Cervus elaphus): (1) seasonal luteal cyclicity. Anim Reprod Sci 59, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainbridge, D and Jabbour, H (1998). Potential of assisted breeding techniques for the conservation of endangered mammalian species in captivity: a review. Vet Rec 143, 159–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bainbridge, D, Hunter, MG, Chapple, DG, Flint, A and Jabbour, HN (1996). Role of estrogen and prostaglandin F2 alpha in premature luteal regression in monovulatory and superovulated red deer (Cervus elaphus). Biol Reprod 54, 347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainbridge, D, Catt, S, Evans, G and Jabbour, H (1999). Successful in vitro fertilization of in vivo matured oocytes aspirated laparoscopically from red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus). Theriogenology 51, 891–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarre, H, Wang, B, Kafidi, N, Gauthier, M, Neveu, N, Lapointe, J, Sneek, L, Leduc, M, Duguay, F and Zhou, J (2003). Production of transgenic goats by pronuclear microinjection of in vitro produced zygotes derived from oocytes recovered by laparoscopy. Theriogenology 59, 831–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baril, G, Remy, B, Vallet, J and Beckers, J-F (1992). Effect of repeated use of progestagen-PMSG treatment for estrus control in dairy goats out of breeding season. Reprod Domest Anim 27, 161–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, D and Asher, G (2003). New developments reproductive technologies in deer. Theriogenology 59, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, D, Thompson, J, Pugh, P, Tervit, H and Asher, G (1995). Successful in vitro culture of early cleavage stage embryos recovered from superovulated red deer (Cervus elaphus). Theriogenology 44, 247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, D, Thompson, J and Asher, G (2002). Development of in vitro embryo production systems for red deer (Cervus elaphus): Part 2. The timing of in vitro nuclear oocyte maturation. Anim Reprod Sci 70, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comizzoli, P, Mermillod, P and Mauget, R (2000). Reproductive biotechnologies for endangered mammalian species. Reprod Nutr Dev 40, 493–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comizzoli, P, Mermillod, P, Cognie, Y, Chai, N, Legendre, X and Mauget, R (2001). Successful in vitro production of embryos in the red deer (Cervus elaphus) and the sika deer (Cervus nippon). Theriogenology 55, 649–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordeiro, MF, Teixeira, PPM, Oliveira, MEF, Di Filippo, PA, Dias, DPM, Beretta, CAG, Dória, RGS, Feliciano, MAR, Coutinho, LN and Vicente, WRR (2014). Reproductive efficiency of adult and prepubertal goats subjected to repeated follicular aspiration. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 66, 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocomo, L, Marques Filho, W, Landim Alvarenga, F and Bicudo, S (2012). Peculiaridades da coleta de oócitos para produção in vitro de embriões ovinos. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 36, 25–31.Google Scholar
Cursino, MS, Zanetti, ES, Saraiva, NZ and Duarte, JMB (2009). Dinâmica nuclear de oócitos de Veado-Catingueiro (Mazama gouazoubira) maturados in vitro. XVIII Congresso Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal, Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Cursino, MS, Salviano, MB, Abril, VV, dos Santos Zanetti, E and Duarte, JMB (2014). The role of chromosome variation in the speciation of the red brocket deer complex: the study of reproductive isolation in females. BMC Evol Biol 14, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, J (1996). Guia de identificação de cervídeos brasileiros. FUNEP, Jaboticabal, p. 8.Google Scholar
Duarte, J (2010). Captive management. In Duarte, JMB and Gonzaléz, S (eds). Neotropical Cervidology: Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer. Jaboticabal, FUNEP. 393 pp.Google Scholar
Duarte, J and Garcia, J (1995). Reprodução assistida em Cervidae brasileiros. Rev Brasil Reprod Anim 19, 111–21.Google Scholar
Duarte, J and Garcia, J (1997). Tecnologia da reprodução para propagação e conservação de espécies ameaçadas de extinção. In Duarte JMB (ed.). Biologia e Conservação de Cervídeos Sul-americanos: Blastocerus, Ozotocerus e Mazama, pp. 228–38.Google Scholar
Favoretto, SM, Zanetti, ES and Duarte, JM (2012). Cryopreservation of red brocket deer semen (Mazama americana): comparison between three extenders. J Zoo Wildl Med 43, 820–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukui, Y, McGowan, L, James, R, Asher, G and Tervit, H (1991). Effects of culture duration and time of gonadotropin addition on in vitro maturation and fertilization of red deer (Cervus elaphus) oocytes. Theriogenology 35, 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A, Bonnet, FP, Cueto, M, Catala, M, Salamone, D and Gonzalez-Bulnes, A (2007). Procedure for maximizing oocyte harvest for in vitro embryo production in small ruminants. Reprod Domest Anim 42, 423–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonçalves, P, Visintin, J, Oliveira, M, Montagner, M and Costa, L (2002). Produção in vitro de embriões. In Biotécnicas Aplicadas à Reprodução Animal, pp. 195–226.Google Scholar
Holt, WV and Pickard, AR (1999). Role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation. Rev Reprod 4, 143–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IUCN (2015). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. v.2015-4 Available at www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 20 May 2018).Google Scholar
Jainudeen, M, Hafez, E, Gollnick, P and Moustafa, LA (1966). Antigonadotropins in the serum of cows following repeated therapeutic pregnant mare serum injections. Am J Vet Res 27, 669.Google ScholarPubMed
Kikuchi, K, Izaike, Y, Noguchi, J, Furukawa, T, Daen, F, Naito, K and Toyoda, Y (1995). Decrease of histone H1 kinase activity in relation to parthenogenetic activation of pig follicular oocytes matured and aged in vitro . J Reprod Fertil 105, 325–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koeman, J, Keefer, CL, Baldassarre, H and Downey, BR (2003). Developmental competence of prepubertal and adult goat oocytes cultured in semi-defined media following laparoscopic recovery. Theriogenology 60, 879–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krogenaes, A, Ropstad, E, Thomassen, R, Pedersen, Ø and Forsberg, M (1994). In vitro maturation and fertilization of oocytes from Norwegian semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Theriogenology 41, 371–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledda, S, Bogliolo, L, Calvia, P, Leoni, G and Naitana, S (1997). Meiotic progression and developmental competence of oocytes collected from juvenile and adult ewes. J Reprod Fertil 109, 73–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locatelli, Y, Vallet, JC, Huyghe, FP, Cognie, Y, Legendre, X and Mermillod, P (2006). Laparoscopic ovum pick-up and in vitro production of sika deer embryos: effect of season and culture conditions. Theriogenology 66, 1334–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loskutoff, N, Bartels, P, Meintjes, M, Godke, R and Schiewe, M (1995). Assisted reproductive technology in nondomestic ungulates: a model approach to preserving and managing genetic diversity. Theriogenology 43, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, C, Asher, G, Berg, D, Tervit, H, Pugh, P, McMillan, W, Beaumont, S, Hall, D and Bell, A (1994). Embryo transfer in fallow deer (Dama dama): superovulation, embryo recovery and laparoscopic transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Theriogenology 42, 579–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigon, H, Clegg, M and Cole, H (1960). The formation of antigonadotrophin in sheep and its effect on the endocrines and reproductive system. Acta Endocrinol 35, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, J, Bringans, M and Buckrell, B (1995). In-vitro production of wapiti and red deer (Cervus elaphus) embryos. Theriogenology 43, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C, Anel, L, Anel, E, Kaabi, M, Boixo, JC, De Paz, P and Olmedo, J (2000). Variación de la respuesta ovárica en aspiraciones foliculares repetidas en corderas. In Libro de Ponencias y Comunicaciones de las XXV Jornadas Científicas de la Sociedad Española de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia, pp. 571–4.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C, Anel, L, Alvarez, M, Anel, E, Boixo, J, Chamorro, C and Paz, PD (2006). Ovum pick-up in sheep: a comparison between different aspiration devices for optimal oocyte retrieval. Reprod Domest Anim 41, 106–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirard, M (2001). Resumption of meiosis: mechanism involved in meiotic progression and its relation with developmental competence. Theriogenology 55, 1241–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siriaroonrat, B (2006). Development of in vitro fertilization for the endangered Eld´s deer (Cervus eldi thamin): Effects of in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture on developmental competence. [Doctoral dissertation.] George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Siriaroonrat, B, Comizzoli, P, Songsasen, N, Monfort, S, Wildt, D and Pukazhenthi, B (2010). Oocyte quality and estradiol supplementation affect in vitro maturation success in the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Theriogenology 73, 112–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stangl, M, Kühholzer, B, Besenfelder, U and Brem, G (1999). Repeated endoscopic ovum pick-up in sheep. Theriogenology 52, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibary, A, Anouassi, A and Khatir, H (2005). Update on reproductive biotechnologies in small ruminants and camelids. Theriogenology 64, 618–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viana, JHM, de Almeida Camargo, LS, de Moraes Ferreira, A, de Sa, WF, de Carvalho Fernandes, CA and Junior, ADPM (2004). Short intervals between ultrasonographically guided follicle aspiration improve oocyte quality but do not prevent establishment of dominant follicles in the Gir breed (Bos indicus) of cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 84, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriach, HM and Chohan, KR (2004). Thickness of cumulus cell layer is a significant factor in meiotic competence of buffalo oocytes. J Vet Sci 5, 247–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, K and Greve, T (1988). A detailed analysis of early events during in-vitro fertilization of bovine follicular oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 82, 127–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X, Kubota, C, Suzuki, H, Taneja, M, Bols, P and Presicce, G (1998). Control of oocyte maturation in cows—biological factors. Theriogenology 49, 471–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanetti, ES (2009). Protocolos de superovulação em veado-catingueiro (Mazama gouazoubira). [Doctoral dissertation.] Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, p. 87.Google Scholar
Zanetti, EdS and Duarte, JMB (2012). Comparison of three protocols for superovulation of brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira). Zoo Biol 31, 642–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanetti, ES, Duarte, JMB, Polegato, BF, Garcia, JM and Canola, JC (2010). Assisted reproductive technology. In Neotropical Cervidology, Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer (Duarte, JMB and Gonzalez, S, eds), pp. 255–270. FUNEP/IUCN: Jaboticabal, Brazil.Google Scholar
Zanetti, ES, Munerato, MS, Cursino, MS and Duarte, JMB (2014). Comparing two different superovulation protocols on ovarian activity and fecal glucocorticoid levels in the brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 12, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar