Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:50:48.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cytochalasin B treatment of mouse oocytes during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) increases embryo survival without impairment of development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2011

Li-li Hu ,
Xing-hui Shen ,
Zhong Zheng ,
Zhen-dong Wang ,
Zhong-hua Liu ,
Lian-hong Jin  and
Lei Lei
Li-li Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150081, Harbin, China.
Xing-hui Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150081, Harbin, China.
Zhong Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150081, Harbin, China.
Zhen-dong Wang
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, No. 59 Mucai Street Xiangfang District, 150030, Harbin, China.
Zhong-hua Liu
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, No. 59 Mucai Street Xiangfang District, 150030, Harbin, China.
Lian-hong Jin*
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, China.
Lei Lei*
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, China.
*
All correspondence to: Lian-hong Jin or Lei Lei. Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, China. Tel: +86 451 86674518. Fax: +86 451 87503325. E-mail: wstjlh@126.com or leil086@yahoo.com.cn.
All correspondence to: Lian-hong Jin or Lei Lei. Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, 194 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, China. Tel: +86 451 86674518. Fax: +86 451 87503325. E-mail: wstjlh@126.com or leil086@yahoo.com.cn.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a technique commonly used in clinical and research settings. In mouse oocytes, conventional ICSI has a poor survival rate caused by a high level of lysis. Cytochalasin B (CB) is a toxic microfilament-inhibiting agent that is known to relax the cytoskeleton and enhance the flexibility of oocytes. CB has been used widely in nuclear transfer experiments to improve the success rate of the micromanipulation, however information describing the use of CB in ICSI is limited. Here, we demonstrated that the addition of 5 μg/ml CB to the manipulation medium of ICSI procedure significantly improved the survival rate of the ICSI embryos (80.74% vs. 89.50%, p < 0.05), and that there was no harm for the in vitro or in vivo development. The birth rates and birth weights were not significantly different between the CB-treated and -untreated groups. Interestingly, the microfilaments of the ICSI embryos were almost undetectable immediately after CB treatment; however, they gradually re-appeared and had fully recovered to the normal level 2 h later. Moreover, CB did not disturb spindle rotation, second polar body formation or pronuclei migration, and had no effect on the microtubules. We thus conclude that ICSI manipulation in CB-containing medium results in significantly improved survival rate of mouse ICSI embryos, and that short-term treatment with CB during ICSI manipulation does not have adverse effects on the development of ICSI embryos.

Keywords

Cytochalasin BIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionMicrofilamentMicrotubuleMouse embryo
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 361 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araki, Y., Yoshizawa, M., Abe, H. & Murase, Y. (2004). Use of mouse oocytes to evaluate the ability of human sperm to activate oocytes after failure of activation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote 12, 111–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baguisi, A., Behboodi, E., Melican, D.T., Pollock, J.S., Destrempes, M.M., Cammuso, C., Williams, J.L., Nims, S.D., Porter, C.A., Midura, P., Palacios, M.J., Ayres, S.L., Denniston, R.S., Hayes, M.L., Ziomek, C.A., Meade, H.M., Godke, R.A., Gavin, W.G., Overstrom, E.W. & Echelard, Y. (1999). Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 456–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatot, C.L., Ziomek, C.A., Bavister, B.D., Lewis, J.L. & Torres, I. (1989). An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 86, 679–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Y.H., Love, L.B., Westhusin, M.E. & Hinrichs, K. (2004). Activation of equine nuclear transfer oocytes: methods and timing of treatment in relation to nuclear remodeling. Biol. Reprod. 70, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collas, P. & Robl, J.M. (1990). Factors affecting the efficiency of nuclear transplantation in the rabbit embryo. Biol. Reprod. 43, 877–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erbach, G.T., Lawitts, J.A., Papaioannou, V.E. & Biggers, J.D. (1994). Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media. Biol. Reprod. 50, 1027–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, A.J., Adams, C.A., Anderson, L.S., Kitchen, J.R., Hughes, M.R. & Wood, S.H. (2008). Development of human cloned blastocysts following somatic cell nuclear transfer with adult fibroblasts. Stem. Cells. 26, 485–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, K., Kinoshita, A., Takuma, Y. & Ogawa, K. (1990). Fertilisation of bovine oocytes by the injection of immobilised, killed spermatozoa. Vet. Rec. 127, 517–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Heindryckx, B., Van der Elst, J., De Sutter, P. & Dhont, M. (2005). Treatment option for sperm- or oocyte-related fertilization failure: assisted oocyte activation following diagnostic heterologous ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 20, 2237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iritani, A., Utsumi, K., Miyake, M., Hosoi, Y. & Saeki, K. (1988). In vitro fertilization by a routine method and by micromanipulation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 541, 583–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. (1992). Synchronous division of mouse two-cell embryos with nocodazole in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 95, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1995). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 52, 709–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanzendorf, S.E., Maloney, M.K., Veeck, L.L., Slusser, J., Hodgen, G.D. & Rosenwaks, Z. (1988). A preclinical evaluation of pronuclear formation by microinjection of human spermatozoa into human oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 49, 835–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longo, F.J. & Chen, D.Y. (1985). Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev. Biol. 107, 382–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maro, B., Johnson, M.H., Pickering, S.J. & Flach, G. (1984). Changes in actin distribution during fertilization of the mouse egg. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 81, 211–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Maro, B., Kubiak, J., Gueth, C., De Pennart, H., Houliston, E., Weber, M., Antony, C. & Aghion, J. (1990). Cytoskeleton organization during oogenesis, fertilization and preimplantation development of the mouse. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 34, 127–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Miranda, A.F., Godman, G.C. & Tanenbaum, S.W. (1974). Action of cytochalasin D on cells of established lines. II. Cortex and microfilaments. J. Cell. Biol. 62, 406–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, A. (2003). Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.Google Scholar
Niemierko, A. (1975). Induction of triploidy in the mouse by cytochalasin B. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 34, 279–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Ogura, A., Inoue, K., Takano, K., Wakayama, T. & Yanagimachi, R. (2000). Birth of mice after nuclear transfer by electrofusion using tail tip cells. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 57, 55–9.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otaegui, P.J., O'Neill, G.T., Campbell, K.H. & Wilmut, I. (1994). Transfer of nuclei from 8-cell stage mouse embryos following use of nocodazole to control the cell cycle. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 39, 147–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palermo, G., Joris, H., Devroey, P. & Van Steirteghem, A.C. (1992). Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340, 17–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paoloni-Giacobino, A. (2006). Implications of reproductive technologies for birth and developmental outcomes: imprinting defects and beyond. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 8, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polejaeva, I.A., Chen, S.H., Vaught, T.D., Page, R.L., Mullins, J., Ball, S., Dai, Y., Boone, J., Walker, S., Ayares, D.L., Colman, A. & Campbell, K.H. (2000). Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407, 86–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, Z. & Hansen, P.J. (2005). Disruption of nuclear maturation and rearrangement of cytoskeletal elements in bovine oocytes exposed to heat shock during maturation. Reproduction 129, 235–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffer, H.E., Schaeffer, B.E. & Brick, I. (1973). Effects of cytochalasin B on the adhesion and electrophoretic mobility of amphibian gastrula cells. Dev. Biol. 34, 163–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, K.A., Yamazaki, Y., Yamamoto, M., Lin, Y., Melhorn, S.J., Krause, E.G., Woods, S.C., Yanagimachi, R., Sakai, R.R. & Tamashiro, K.L. (2010). Glucose parameters are altered in mouse offspring produced by assisted reproductive technologies and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod. 83, 220–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiota, K. & Yamada, S. (2005). Assisted reproductive technologies and birth defects. Congenit. Anom. 45, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L.C. & Wilmut, I. (1989). Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation. Biol. Reprod. 40, 1027–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, M.H. (1973). Tetraploid mouse embryos produced by cytochalasin B during cleavage. Nature. 244, 513–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, M.H. (1975). Embryonic development of tetraploid mice during the second half of gestation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 34, 707–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Soewarto, D., Schmiady, H. & Eichenlaub-Ritter, U. (1995). Consequences of non-extrusion of the first polar body and control of the sequential segregation of homologues and chromatids in mammalian oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 10, 2350–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spooner, B.S., Yamada, K.M. & Wessells, N.K. (1971). Microfilaments and cell locomotion. J. Cell. Biol. 49, 595–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, P. & Schultz, R.M. (2010). ICSI in the mouse. Methods. Enzymol. 476, 251–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Q.Y. & Schatten, H. (2006). Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. Reproduction 131, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Q.Y., Lai, L., Park, K.W., Kuhholzer, B., Prather, R.S. & Schatten, H. (2001). Dynamic events are differently mediated by microfilaments, microtubules, and mitogen-activated protein kinase during porcine oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 64, 879–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarkowski, A.K., Witkowska, A. & Opas, J. (1977). Development of cytochalasin in B-induced tetraploid and diploid/tetraploid mosaic mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 41, 47–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Tesarik, J., Rienzi, L., Ubaldi, F., Mendoza, C. & Greco, E. (2002). Use of a modified intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique to overcome sperm-borne and oocyte-borne oocyte activation failures. Fertil. Steril. 78, 619–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uehara, T. & Yanagimachi, R. (1976). Microsurgical injection of spermatozoa into hamster eggs with subsequent transformation of sperm nuclei into male pronuclei. Biol. Reprod. 15, 467–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uehara, T. & Yanagimachi, R. (1977). Behavior of nuclei of testicular, caput and cauda epididymal spermatozoa injected into hamster eggs. Biol Reprod. 16, 315–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakayama, T. (2007). Production of cloned mice and ES cells from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer: how to improve cloning efficiency? J. Reprod. Dev. 53, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakayama, T. & Yanagimachi, R. (2001). Effect of cytokinesis inhibitors, DMSO and the timing of oocyte activation on mouse cloning using cumulus cell nuclei. Reproduction 122, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakayama, T., Perry, A.C., Zuccotti, M., Johnson, K.R. & Yanagimachi, R. (1998). Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature. 394, 369–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W.H., Abeydeera, L.R., Prather, R.S. & Day, B.N. (2000). Polymerization of nonfilamentous actin into microfilaments is an important process for porcine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, D.N., Misica, P.M. & Tervit, H.R. (1999). Production of cloned calves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granulosa cells. Biol. Reprod. 60, 996–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamada, K.M., Spooner, B.S. & Wessells, N.K. (1971). Ultrastructure and function of growth cones and axons of cultured nerve cells. J. Cell. Biol. 49, 614–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R. (2005). Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa and spermatogenic cells: its biology and applications in humans and animals. Reprod. Biomed. Online 10, 247–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Z.Y., Chen, D.Y., Li, J.S., Lian, L., Lei, L., Han, Z.M. & Sun, Q.Y. (2003). Rotation of meiotic spindle is controlled by microfilaments in mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 68, 943–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed