Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:44:22.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deficiencies in extrusion of the second polar body due to high calcium concentrations during in vitro fertilization in inbred C3H/He mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2015

Yuki Ohta ,
Yoshikazu Nagao ,
Naojiro Minami ,
Satoshi Tsukamoto  and
Seiji Kito
Yuki Ohta
Affiliation:
Science Service Inc., 4-9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan. Department of Technical Support and Development, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan. University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Shimokomoriya 443, Mohka, Tochigi 321–4415, Japan. Present address: Yakult Central Institute, 5–11 Izumi, Kunitachi-shi, Tokyo, 186–8650, Japan.
Yoshikazu Nagao
Affiliation:
University Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Shimokomoriya 443, Mohka, Tochigi 321–4415, Japan.
Naojiro Minami
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606–8502, Japan.
Satoshi Tsukamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Technical Support and Development, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan.
Seiji Kito*
Affiliation:
Department of Technical Support and Development, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4–9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan. Department of Technical Support and Development, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan.
*
All correspondence to: S. Kito. Department of Technical Support and Development, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4–9-1 Anagawa Inage-ku, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan. Tel: +81 43 206 3059. Fax: +81 43 206 4093. E-mail: sk126@nirs.go.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Successful in vitro fertilization (IVF) of all inbred strains of laboratory mice has not yet been accomplished. We have previously shown that a high calcium concentration improved IVF in various inbred mice. However, we also found that in cumulus-free ova of C3H/He mice such IVF conditions significantly increased the deficiency of extrusion of the second polar body (PBII) in a dose-dependent manner (2% at 1.71 mM and 29% at 6.84 mM, P < 0.05) and that PBII extrusion was affected by high calcium levels at 2–3 h post-insemination. While developmental competence of ova without PBII extrusion to blastocysts after 96 h culture was not affected, a significant reduction in the nuclear number of the inner cell mass was observed in blastocyst fertilized under high calcium condition. We also examined how high calcium concentration during IVF affects PBII extrusion in C3H/He mice. Cumulus cells cultured under high calcium conditions showed a significantly alleviated deficient PBII extrusion. This phenomenon is likely to be specific to C3H/He ova because deficient PBII extrusion in reciprocal fertilization between C3H and BDF1 gametes was observed only in C3H/He ova. Sperm factor(s) was still involved in deficient PBII extrusion due to high calcium concentrations, as this phenomenon was not observed in ova activated by ethanol. The cytoskeletal organization of ova without PBII extrusion showed disturbed spindle rotation, incomplete formation of contractile ring and disturbed localization of actin, suggesting that high calcium levels affect the anchoring machinery of the meiotic spindle. These results indicate that in C3H/He mice high calcium levels induce abnormal fertilization, i.e. deficient PBII extrusion by affecting the cytoskeletal organization, resulting in disturbed cytokinesis during the second meiotic division. Thus, use of high calcium media for IVF should be avoided for this strain.

Keywords

C3H/He miceCalcium and cytoskeletal organizationIn vitro fertilizationInbredOvaSecond polar body
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 603 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, P.L. & Katz, D.D. (1979). Part 1 mouse and rat. I. Mice. In Inbred and Genetically Defined Strains of Laboratory Animals, pp. 9–229. Federation of American Society for Experimental Biology, Bethesda, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Azoury, J., Verlhac, M.H. & Dumont, J. (2009) Actin filaments: key players in the control of asymmetric divisions in mouse oocytes. Biol. Cell 101, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biggers, J., Lynda, K. McGinnis, L. & Raffin, M (2000). Amino acids and preimplantation development of the mouse in protein-free potassium simplex optimized medium. Biol. Reprod. 63, 281–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockmann, C., Huarte, J., Dugina, V., Challet, L., Rey, E., Conne, B., Swetloff, A., Nef, S., Chaponnier, C. & Vassalli, J.D. (2011). Beta- and gamma-cytoplasmic actins are required for meiosis in mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 85, 1025–39.Google Scholar
Brunet, S. & Verlhac, M.H. (2011). Positioning to get out of meiosis: the asymmetry of division. Hum. Reprod. Update 17, 68–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, S.L., Payson, S.J. & Taft, R.A. (2006). Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Theriogenology 65, 1716–26.Google Scholar
Chaigne, A., Verlhac, M.H. & Terret, M.E. (2012). Spindle positioning in mammalian oocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 318, 1442–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critser, J.K. & Mobraaten, L.E. (2000). Cryopreservation of murine spermatozoa. ILAR J. 41, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthbertson, K.S.R, Whittingham, D.G. & Cobbold, P.H. (1981) Free Ca2+ increases in exponential phases during mouse oocyte activation. Nature 294, 754–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, M.Q. & Fan, B.Q. (1996). Intracellular Ca2+ during fertilization and artificial activation in mouse oocytes. Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao 17, 357–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Ducibella, T. & Fissore, R. (2008). The roles of Ca2+, downstream protein kinases, and oscillatory signaling in regulating fertilization and the activation of development. Dev. Biol. 315, 257–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducibella, T., Schultz, R.M. & Ozil, J.P. (2006) Role of calcium signals in early development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 17, 324–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, L.R. (1987). Minimum and maximum extracellular Ca2+ requirements during mouse sperm capacitation and fertilization in vitro . J. Reprod. Fertil. 81, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, L.R. (1993). In vitro capacitation and fertilization. Method Enzymol. 225, 239–53Google Scholar
Gaunt, S.J. (1983). Spreading of a sperm surface antigen within the plasma membrane of the egg after fertilization in the rat. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 75, 259–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Gundersen, G.G., Medill, L. & Shapiro, B.M. (1986). Sperm surface proteins are incorporated into the egg membrane and cytoplasm after fertilization. Dev. Biol. 113, 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hino, T., Oda, K., Nakamura, K., Tateno, H., Toyoda, Y. & Yokoyama, M. (2011). Accelerated modification of the zona pellucida is the primary cause of decreased fertilizability of oocytes in the 129 inbred mouse strain. Zygote 19, 315–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, Y., Wigglesworth, K., Eppig, J.J. & Schultz, R.M. (1995). Preimplantation development of mice embryos in KSOM: augmentation by amino acids and analysis of gene expression. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 41, 232–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huneau, D. & Crozet, N. (1989). In vitro fertilization in the sheep: effect of elevated calcium concentration at insemination. Gamete Res. 23, 119–25.Google Scholar
Itagaki, Y. & Toyoda, Y. (1992). Effects of prolonged sperm preincubation and elevated calcium concentration on fertilization of cumulus-free mouse eggs in vitro . J. Reprod. Dev. 38, 219–24.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., Bierle, B.M., Gallicano, G.I. & Capco, D.G. (1998). Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and calmodulin: regulators of the meiotic spindle in mouse eggs. Dev. Biol. 204, 464–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, R. & Kraicer, P.F. (1978). Effect of elevated calcium concentration on fertilization of rat oocyte in vitro . Gamete Res. 1, 281–5.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M.H. (1982). The chromosome complement of single-pronuclear haploid mouse embryos following activation by ethanol treatment. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 71, 139–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, E., Yamashita, M., Kimura, M., Honda, A., Kashiwabara, S., & Baba, T. (2008). Sperm penetration through cumulus mass and zona pellucida. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52, 677–82.Google Scholar
Kito, S., Hayao, T., Noguchi-Kawasaki, Y., Ohta, Y., Hideki, U. & Tateno, S. 2004. Improved in vitro fertilization and development by use of modified human tubal fluid and applicability of pronucleate embryos for cryopreservation by rapid freezing in inbred mice. Comp. Med. 54, 564–70.Google Scholar
Kito, S. & Ohta, Y. (2005). Medium effects on capacitation and sperm penetration through the zona pellucida in inbred BALB/c spermatozoa. Zygote 13, 145–53.Google Scholar
Kito, S. & Ohta, Y. (2008a). In vitro fertilization in inbred BALB/c mice I: isotonic osmolarity and increased calcium-enhanced sperm penetration through the zona pellucida and male pronuclear formation. Zygote 16, 249–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kito, S. & Ohta, Y. (2008b). In vitro fertilization in inbred BALB/c mice II: effects of lactate, osmolarity and calcium on in vitro capacitation. Zygote 16, 259–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauchunas, A.R. & Wolfner, M.F. (2013). Molecular changes during egg activation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 102, 267–92.Google Scholar
Lawitts, J.A. & Biggers, J.D. (1993). Culture of preimplantation embryos. Methods Enzymol. 225, 153–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, H.J. & Barton, A.M. (1985). Production of pyruvate by isolated mouse cumulus cells. J. Exp. Zool. 234, 231–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marangos, P., Fitzharris, G. & Carroll, J. (2003) Ca2+ oscillations at fertilization in mammals are regulated by the formation of pronuclei. Development 130, 1461–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markoulaki, S., Matson, S., Abbott, A.L. & Ducibella, T. (2003). Oscillatory CaMKII activity in mouse egg activation. Dev. Biol. 258, 464–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miao, Y.L., Stein, P., Jefferson, W.N., Padilla-Banks, E. & Williams, C.J. (2012). Calcium influx-mediated signaling is required for complete mouse egg activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4169–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyamoto, H. & Ishibashi, T. (1975). The role of calcium ions in fertilization of mouse and rat eggs in vitro . J. Reprod. Fertil. 45, 523–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagasawa, H., Miyamoto, M. and Fujimoto, M. (1973). Reproductivity in inbred strains of mice and project for their efficient production. Exp. Animals (Japan) 22, 119–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, S.H., Miyoshi, K. & Funahashi, H. (1998) Rat oocytes fertilized in modified rat 1-cell embryo culture medium containing a high sodium chloride concentration and bovine serum albumin maintain developmental ability to the blastocyst stage. Biol. Reprod. 59, 884–9.Google Scholar
Ozil, J.P., Banrezes, B., Tóth, S., Pan, H. & Schultz, R.M. (2006). Ca2+ oscillatory pattern in fertilized mouse eggs affects gene expression and development to term. Dev. Biol. 300, 534–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozil, J.P., Markoulaki, S., Tóth, S., Matson, S., Banrezes, B., Knott, J.G., Schultz, R.M., Huneau, D. & Ducibella, T. (2005). Egg activation events are regulated by the duration of a sustained [Ca2+]cyt signal in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 282, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, P., Warnes, G.M., Kerin, J.F. & Kirby, C. (1985) Culture factors affecting the success rate of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 442, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, P. & Whittingham, D.G. (1982) Effect of fatty acids on fertilization and development of mouse embryos in vitro . J. Androl. 3, 440–444 Google Scholar
Rogers, N.T., Halet, G., Piao, Y., Carroll, J., Ko, M.S. & Swann, K. (2006). The absence of a Ca2+ signal during mouse egg activation can affect parthenogenetic preimplantation development, gene expression patterns, and blastocyst quality. Reproduction 132, 45–57.Google Scholar
Saunders, C.M., Larman, M.G., Parrington, J., Cox, L.J., Royse, J., Blayney, L.M., Swann, K. & Lai, F.A. (2002). PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca2+ oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 129, 3533–44.Google Scholar
Simon, M.M., Greenaway, S., White, J.K., Fuchs, H., Gailus-Durner, V., Wells, S., Sorg, T., Wong, K., Bedu, E., Cartwright, E.J., Dacquin, R., Djebali, S., Estabel, J., Graw, J., Ingham, N.J., Jackson, I.J., Lengeling, A., Mandillo, S., Marvel, J., Meziane, H., Preitner, F., Puk, O., Roux, M., Adams, D.J., Atkins, S., Ayadi, A., Becker, L., Blake, A., Brooker, D., Cater, H., Champy, M.F., Combe, R., Danecek, P., di Fenza, A., Gates, H., Gerdin, A.K., Golini, E., Hancock, J.M., Hans, W., Hölter, S.M., Hough, T., Jurdic, P., Keane, T.M., Morgan, H., Müller, W., Neff, F., Nicholson, G., Pasche, B., Roberson, L.A., Rozman, J., Sanderson, M., Santos, L., Selloum, M., Shannon, C., Southwell, A., Tocchini-Valentini, G.P., Vancollie, V.E., Westerberg, H., Wurst, W., Zi, M., Yalcin, B., Ramirez-Solis, R., Steel, K.P., Mallon, A.M., de Angelis, M.H., Herault, Y. & Brown, S.D. (2013). A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains. Genome Biol. 14, R82.Google Scholar
Simpson, E.M., Linder, C.C., Sargent, E.E., Davisson, M.T., Mobraaten, L.E. & Sharp, J.J. (1997). Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice. Nat. Genet. 16, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Q.Y. & Schatten, H. (2006). Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. Reproduction 131, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sztein, J.M., Farley, J.S. & Mobraaten, L.E. (2000). In vitro fertilization with cryopreserved inbred mouse sperm. Biol. Reprod. 63, 1774–80.Google Scholar
Takagi, N., Wake, N. & Sasaki, M. (1978). Cytologic evidence for preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in XX mouse blastocysts. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 20, 240–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatone, C., Delle Monache, S., Iorio, R., Caserta, D., Di Cola, M. & Colonna, R. (2002) Possible role for Ca2+ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II as an effector of the fertilization Ca2+ signal in mouse oocyte activation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 8, 750–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, C.E., Brown, S.D. & Glenister, P.H. (1999). Large numbers of mice established by in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved spermatozoa: implications and applications for genetic resource banks, mutagenesis screens, and mouse backcrosses. Mamm. Genome 10, 987–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Threadgill, D.W., Yee, D., Matin, A., Nadeau, J.H. & Magnuson, T. (1997) Genealogy of the 129 inbred strains: 129/SvJ is a contaminated inbred strain. Mamm. Genome 8, 390–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toyoda, Y., Yokoyama, M. & Hoshi, T. (1971). Studies on fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. I. In vitro fertilization of eggs by fresh epididymal sperm. Jpn J. Anim. Reprod. 16, 147–51.Google Scholar
Tóth, S., Huneau, D., Banrezes, B. & Ozil, J.P. (2006). Egg activation is the result of calcium signal summation in the mice. Reproduction 131, 27–34.Google Scholar
Vasudevan, K., Raber, J. & Sztein, J. (2010). Fertility comparison between wild type and transgenic mice by in vitro fertilization. Transgenic Res. 19, 587–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakai, T., Vanderheyden, V. & Fissore, R.A. (2011). Ca2+ signaling during mammalian fertilization: requirements, players, and adaptations. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, pii: a006767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C. & Machaty, Z. (2013). Calcium influx in mammalian eggs. Reproduction 145, R97–R105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R. (1994). Mammalian fertilization. In The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd edn (eds Knobil, E. & Neill, J.D.), pp. 189–317. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn, pp. 277–305. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar