Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:26:12.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of a PCR-based method to identify fetal sex during IVF cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Atieh Sadat Mousavi
Affiliation:
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sadegh Amiri
Affiliation:
Reproductive Sciences and Technology Research Center, Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Shahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (ShACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
Mehdi Mehdizadeh
Affiliation:
Reproductive Sciences and Technology Research Center, Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mehrdad Bakhtiari
Affiliation:
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Jamileh Sadat Mirsanei
Affiliation:
Reproductive Sciences and Technology Research Center, Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fatemeh Nikmard
Affiliation:
Laleh IVF Clinic, Laleh Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Mahmood Barati*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fatemehsadat Amjadi*
Affiliation:
Reproductive Sciences and Technology Research Center, Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Shahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (ShACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding authors: Mahmood Barati; Email: Mahmood.bararti@gmail.com; Fatemehsadat Amjadi; Email: amjadi.fs@iums.ac.ir
Corresponding authors: Mahmood Barati; Email: Mahmood.bararti@gmail.com; Fatemehsadat Amjadi; Email: amjadi.fs@iums.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most recognizable cases of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is X-linked diseases. Diagnosis of fetal sex is essential for couples who are known to be at risk of some X-linked disorders. The objective of this study was to discriminate between female (XX) and male (XY) embryos by detecting sex chromosomes-specific sequences in spent culture medium and comparing these results to PGD/CGH array results. It may open new window for the development of a non-invasive PGD method. 120 Embryo’s spent media from Day 3 and Day 5 embryos were collected. Modified phenol-chloroform solution was used for DNA extraction from spent media. Sex determination was performed using SRY, TSPY and AMELOGENIN evaluation through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) method. IBM SPSS and MedCalc were used for statistical analyses to compare sex determination of embryos by spent medium with PGD/CGH array results. Culture time was demonstrated to increase the DNA amount among day 5 embryos culture medium samples. Non-invasive PGD by means of spent culture medium gave a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 100% for sex determination. Results of sex determination using spent medium by q-PCR were consistent with the results of PGD/CGH array. Improvements in cell-free DNA extraction and PCR amplification procedures provide us an effective method to perform a PGD test without biopsy in the future, especially about X-linked diseases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a routine clinical tool is combined with invasive procedures such as biopsy of cleavage-stage embryos or trophectoderm cells which can give couples a chance to avoid having a baby with genetic defects during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles (Magli et al., Reference Magli, Pomante, Cafueri, Valerio, Crippa, Ferraretti and Gianaroli2016, McReynolds et al., Reference Mcreynolds, Vanderlinden, Stevens, Hansen, Schoolcraft and Katz-Jaffe2011, Meseguer et al., Reference Meseguer, Herrero, Tejera, Hilligsøe, Ramsing and Remohí2011, Palini et al., Reference Palini, Galluzzi, De Stefani, Bianchi, Wells, Magnani and Bulletti2013). Embryo biopsy procedure for genetic analysis is a traumatic manipulation that may impair embryo development (Shahine and Lathi, Reference Shahine and Lathi2014). This procedure is also expensive and time consuming (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wu, Wang, Chen, Chen and Zhang2017). Thus, a safer and cheaper approach is needed to screen preimplantation embryos for genetic disease (Shamonki et al., Reference Shamonki, Jin, Haimowitz and Liu2016). One of the most recognizable cases of PGD is X-linked diseases. Diagnosis of fetal sex is essential for couples who are known to be at risk of some X-linked disorders (Assou et al., Reference Assou, Ait-Ahmed, El Messaoudi, Thierry and Hamamah2014). If parents have these types of disorders, male fetuses will have the defect, however, the female fetuses will be healthy but the carrier (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Ding, Shen, Wang, Li, Cai, Xu, Zhong and Zhou2015). According to previous studies, embryonic genomic DNA has been reported to be found in spent embryo culture medium (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Fang, Chen, Chen, Xiao, Yang, Wang, Song, Ma and Bo2016, Feichtinger et al., Reference Feichtinger, Vaccari, Carli, Wallner, Mädel, Figl, Palini and Feichtinger2017, Galluzzi et al., Reference Galluzzi, Palini, Stefani, Andreoni, Primiterra, Diotallevi, Bulletti and Magnani2015, Shamonki et al., Reference Shamonki, Jin, Haimowitz and Liu2016). Proposing the spent culture medium of embryos obtained by IVF as a source of embryonic DNA has opened novel perspectives for the development of the non-invasive screening preimplantation embryos method (Stigliani et al., Reference Stigliani, Anserini, Venturini and Scaruffi2013). The reliability of this new technique for clinical use, however, needs to be determined.

A number of Y chromosome-specific sequences such as SRY and TSPY have been investigated for sex determination. The highly conserved TSPY gene, repeated 27–40 times, is one of the widely used genes for this purpose. In the testis, exclusively, a 1.3 kb transcript is produced which is translated to a 33 kDa protein. This protein is homologous to the nucleosome assembly protein 1 (NAP-1) and the proto-oncogene SET (Schnieders et al., Reference Schnieders, Dörk, Arnemann, Vogel, Werner and Schmidtke1996), both of which are able to bind with B-type cyclins to activate the cyclin B1-CDK1 kinase during the cell cycle (Kellogg et al., Reference Kellogg, Kikuchi, Fujii-Nakata, Turck and Murray1995). Detection of TSPY protein in testis sections using in situ hybridization technique shows that the TSPY protein is located primarily in the cytoplasm of the mitotic spermatogonia. It is suggested that TSPY plays a role in spermatogonial differentiation and/or proliferation (Schnieders et al., Reference Schnieders, Dörk, Arnemann, Vogel, Werner and Schmidtke1996).

The SRY gene is located on the nonrecombining region of the Y chromosome and consists of a single exon encoding amino acids. SRY gene contains a region termed the high mobility group (HMG) box which is located in the center. The SRY-HMG box region has special characteristics, which makes it a perfect target for sex determination tests that are DNA based. For instance, the sequence of this region is highly conserved between different species (Shahid et al., Reference Shahid, Dhillon, Khalil, Haque, Batra, Husain and Looijenga2010).

The male genotype can be indicated using these targets, by amplification of the product from the TSPY or SRY gene, but a female genotype cannot be indicated accurately. This limitation may be caused by DNA lack/degeneration in the examined sample. In this case, the amplicon may be absent that limits the test results. Another reason could be a false-negative result, caused by a technical error during the process of examination. Recently, the sex determination test used by various PCR kits for short tandem repeats (STRs) has become a standardized method. In the test, the AMELX and AMELY sequences (homologous sequences) of amelogenin genes in the X and Y chromosomes are simultaneously amplified (Nakahori et al., Reference Nakahori, Hamano, Iwaya and Nakagome1991). On the electropherogram, the single peak caused by the X chromosome can be used to discriminate the female sample from a false negative (Sullivan et al., Reference Sullivan, Mannucci, Kimpton and Gill1993). The amelogenin gene, which has been conserved during the evolution of vertebrates, is translated to a vital protein in the mammalian tooth and enamel matrix. The AMEL amplification by PCR has been used by several studies for sex determination (Sullivan et al., Reference Sullivan, Mannucci, Kimpton and Gill1993). However, in some populations, male subjects might be misidentified as female, due to interstitial deletion in the Yp involving AMELY (Steinlechner et al., Reference Steinlechner, Berger, Niederstätter and Parson2002, Thangaraj et al., Reference Thangaraj, Reddy and Singh2002, Roffey et al., Reference Roffey, Eckhoff and Kuhl2000, Jobling et al., Reference Jobling, Lo, Turner, Bowden, Lee, Xue, Carvalho-Silva, Hurles, Adams and Chang2007, Yong et al., Reference Yong, Gan, Chang and Yap2007).

In this study, we developed a new method for sex determination using a multiplex PCR of the samples derived from blastocyst culture media.

Materials and methods

Fertilized oocytes obtained from patients, candidates for PGD, were cultured individually until day 3 in 20 μl of G-1 PLUS sequential medium (Vitrolife, Gothenburg, Sweden) and from day 3 to day 5 in 20 μl of G-2 PLUS sequential medium (Vitrolife, Gothenburg, Sweden). Medium droplets were overlaid with paraffin oil and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 6% CO2. Trophectoderm biopsy was performed on Day 5 after ICSI as a part of the clinical routine. After embryo removal, embryologist collected spent embryo culture medium in RNAase-DNAase-free tubes and promptly frozen at –80 °C for cell-free DNA analysis. During sample collection, appropriate precautions were followed to avoid contamination. In this study, two groups were evaluated, in the first group, spent media was collected on day 3 and in the second group spent media was collected on day 5.

120 spent culture media samples (64 spent media from day 3 and 56 from day 5) were used in the present study. 30 medium droplets incubated in parallel under the same conditions, without previous exposure with embryo, were also processed for PCR negative controls, to exclude contamination.

Standard group and reference DNA

Male whole blood cells and uterine endometrial cells were employed as standard groups for men and females, respectively, in this investigation. An equivalent volume of embryo culture media cultured under the same conditions without prior contact with the embryo was collected as a negative control. After DNA extraction using a DNA extraction kit (QIAGEN) according to the protocol, the concentration of DNA was measured by Nano drop (Thermo Scientific). The elution buffer from the DNA extraction kit was used as blank. Measured DNA was then serially diluted to calculate the range, linearity and limit of detection (LOD) of the test. Standard curves were plotted with 1 to 10000 copy number/µl concentrations, and serial dilutions of total DNA obtained from DNA were made.

To make a standard solution with a certain quantity of genomic DNA, Nano drop was used to assess the concentration of total extracted DNA. After that, the concentration was divided by the weight of a diploid cell’s DNA (6.5pg). Finally, concentrations of 10,000, 1000, 100, 10 and 1 copy number/l were generated by serial dilution. Finally, we also used this serials dilution as control groups to compare with examined samples.

Cell-free DNA quantification from spent culture media

According to previous studies (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wu, Wang, Chen, Chen and Zhang2017), we first used the boiling method and then the ethanol precipitation of DNA to extract DNA from the culture medium, but no acceptable results were obtained from these methods. The final and efficient method used in this study to extract DNA was a modified phenol-chloroform solution. In this procedure, first, TE (Tris-EDTA) buffer and PK (proteinase k) were added to the culture medium, equivalent and 0.1 volume of culture medium, respectively. Second, this solution was incubated in a water bath for 3 hours at 56 degrees Celsius. The culture medium solution was then mixed with the same amount of phenol-chloroform (1:4) solution and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 12000 RCF. The supernatant was then placed into other tubes, avoiding contact with the tube’s bottom. This step was repeated twice. Afterwards, we added absolute ethanol 96%, glycogen and ammonium acetate, the double volume of Supernatant, 0.2 of Supernatant and the same volume of Supernatant, respectively. This solution was incubated at –20 °C overnight and centrifuged for 15 min in 12000 RCF and then washed pellet with ethanol 75% and centrifuged for 10 min in 10000 RCF twice.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

The present level of SRY, TSPY and AMELOGENIN genes in the culture media sample and control group was evaluated by real-time PCR (Corbett, Australia). The PCR reactions were done in a total volume of 10 µl containing, 1 µl gene-specific primers, 2 µl master mix (5X EVA Green qPCR Master Mix, Bioneer), 5 µl extracted DNA and 2 µl DEPSE water. The thermal cycle profile was one cycle at 95° for 15 min, followed by 55 cycles at, 95°for 15 s, 60°for 20 s and 72° for 20 s, and finally, a melting curve program was from 60 to 95 °C. All assays were performed in triplicate. No template controls were included in each PCR run. Melting curves of PCR reactions were monitored to ensure that there was one single PCR product and no primer dimmer. Standard curves were obtained for each gene using the logarithmic dilution series of samples. Standard curves were used to assess primers efficiency. The gene-specific primers used are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. The primer sequences (5′-3′) used in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Data were analysed using MedCalc software based on this method ability for accurate diagnosis of males and females as well as its specificity, sensitivity and accuracy.

Results

Analytical validation of qPCR method

The gDNA in spent medium samples was detected and quantified by real-time PCR using the SRY, TSPY, AMELOGENIN genes amplification as a target. The gDNA content in the media was estimated using a standard curve plotted with purified human gDNA as serial dilution. The amount of endometrial and men’s whole blood cell gDNA was 86000 and 52000 pg/µl, respectively. According to the weight of haploid DNA is approximately 6.5 pg/µl, we calculated the amount of DNA extracted approximately and used the values obtained for dilution.

Hence, as shown in Figures 14, the LOD of this examination was 1copy number/RXN which means if only 1copy of target DNA has existed in reaction, it will be detected. This finding was corroborated by the same melting temperature of all concentrations of standard DNA and samples. The melting peak of SRY and TSPY genes was 83.27 °C (Figure 1), 83.03 °C (Figure 2), respectively. AMLOGENIN gene showed a single melting peak at 80.33 °C for females and males (Figures 3 and 4).

Figure 1. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification SRY gene of whole blood cell of men.

Figure 2. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification TSPY gene of whole blood cell of men.

Figure 3. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification AMELOGENIN gene of whole blood cell of men.

Figure 4. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification AMELOGENIN gene of endometrial cells of women.

Discovering and quantifying the SRY, TSPY and AMELOGENIN genes in embryo culture media

We evaluated spent culture media samples from 120 individual human embryos that were cultured for Days 3 and 5 Days. Out of 64 spent media collected on day 3, AMELOGENIN and TSPY genes were amplified in none of the samples, whereas amplification of the SRY gene was observed in only 10 samples of them. Among 56 samples which collected on day 5, 33 and 23 of them were male and female, respectively, according to PGD/CGH array results.

Sex determination in all medium samples collected on day 5 was confirmed by comparing with PGD/CGH array results (Figures 58). There was at least one of the mentioned genes compatible (Table 2). Among 33 male samples, 4 samples were SRY and AMELOGENIN positive and TSPY negative. However, in 4 of 33 samples, SRY and TSPY positive and AMELOGENIN negative. In 5 out of 33 male samples, only SRY gene was amplified. In 3 out of 33 male samples, SRY was negative and TSPY or AMELOGENIN positive. Moreover, all three genes, SRY, AMELOGENIN and TSPY, were amplified in 17 of 33 male samples. SRY, AMELOGENIN and TSPY did not amplify in any of the 23 female samples (Figure 9).

Figure 5. Melting curve and quantitation analysis of amplification SRY gene of culture medium.

Figure 6. Melting curve amplification and quantitation analysis_cycling A. Green of AMELOGENIN XY gene of culture medium.

Figure 7. Melting curve of amplification and quantitation analysis_cycling A. Green of AMELOGENIN XX gene of culture medium.

Figure 8. Melting curve of amplification and quantitation analysis_cycling A. Green of TSPY gene of culture medium.

Table 2. Result of sex determination in all medium samples collected on day 5 comparing with PGD/CGH array results

Figure 9. Comparing PGD/CGH array results to cell-free DNA analysis. Sixty-four spent culture media were collected on day 3. Fifty-six spent culture media were collected on day 5. The results from trophectoderm biopsy and cell-free DNA analysis were compared and classified according to the observed patterns.

According to the study results, the test’s sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 90.91 %, 100%, 100% and 88.46 %, respectively, by considering SRY gene alone. These results were 72.7%, 100%, 100% and 71.88 %, respectively, by considering AMELOGENIN or TSPY gene alone. All of these items increase to 100% by considering all three genes. Furthermore, the accuracy of SRY, AMELOGENIN or TSPY gene to determine the sex of embryo was 94.64 %, 83.93% and 83.93%, respectively, that increase to 100% by considering all three genes.

Discussion

Sex-linked diseases are a type of genetic defect which affects the male fetus; therefore, sex determination is essential in these cases (Esmaeili et al., Reference Esmaeili, Bazrgar, Gourabi, Ebrahimi, Boroujeni and Fakhri2020). More than 200 X-linked recessive disorders which affect hemizygous male could be easily prevented by gender selection (Esmaeili et al., Reference Esmaeili, Bazrgar, Gourabi, Ebrahimi, Boroujeni and Fakhri2020). Currently, genetic screening of embryos before implantation relies on an invasive biopsy process to obtain DNA from embryo generated by IVF (Esmaeili et al., Reference Esmaeili, Bazrgar, Gourabi, Ebrahimi, Boroujeni and Fakhri2020, Feichtinger et al., Reference Feichtinger, Vaccari, Carli, Wallner, Mädel, Figl, Palini and Feichtinger2017). Although the biopsy procedure is the preferred method worldwide and highly reproducible among clinics, it can be detrimental to the embryo development and implantation potential. It is also expensive and time-consuming (Feichtinger et al., Reference Feichtinger, Vaccari, Carli, Wallner, Mädel, Figl, Palini and Feichtinger2017). It seems this invasive procedure should be replaced by a non-invasive and more cost-effective PGD technique (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wu, Wang, Chen, Chen and Zhang2017).

Recently, the detection of cell-free DNA in the spent culture medium of embryos proposes the possibility of a non-invasive PGS approach. The probability of amplifying cell-free DNA from the culture medium has been previously investigated for diagnosis of X-linked diseases, cystic fibrosis and alpha thalassemia (Capalbo et al., Reference Capalbo, Romanelli, Cimadomo, Girardi, Stoppa, Dovere, Dell’edera, Ubaldi and Rienzi2016). The result of our study indicates that the amount of cell-free DNA in human embryo spent media is significantly more than in medium that has not been exposed to embryos. It reveals that the embryo releases genetic substances into the culture media.

We investigated and compared the amount of the gDNA using TSPY, SRY and AMELOGENIN expression by qPCR on day 3 and day 5. The results of our experiment represent that expression of these genes was significantly higher on day 5 compared to day 3, suggesting that embryo stage and collection time significantly influenced DNA release in culture medium. However, we could not quantify the amount of extracted DNA because we did not access Bioanalyser or other devices for quantification of very low amount of DNA.

Inconsistent with the results of our experiments, it was reported a high correlation between sex chromosomes determination and a lower rate of false-negative results in culture media from day 5 against samples from day 3 (Feichtinger et al., Reference Feichtinger, Vaccari, Carli, Wallner, Mädel, Figl, Palini and Feichtinger2017). Galluzzi et al. suggested that the TSPY gene appears poorly amplifiable before day 5/6, these results were also consistent with the results of our experiments (Capalbo et al., Reference Capalbo, Romanelli, Cimadomo, Girardi, Stoppa, Dovere, Dell’edera, Ubaldi and Rienzi2016).

The present study removed cumulus cells, ICSI fertilization and single embryo culture to avoid contamination and false-negative results (Shamonki et al., Reference Shamonki, Jin, Haimowitz and Liu2016). We compared the results of medium-based sexing with those obtained by aCGH to assess the accuracy and sensitivity of the test. The sex of embryos was diagnosed correctly from the spent medium samples using TSPY, SRY and AMELOGENIN amplification in all of 56 samples from day 5. Linlin yang investigated the presence of gDNA in culture medium only by amplification of SRY gene (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wu, Wang, Chen, Chen and Zhang2017), while in the current study, TSPY, SRY and AMELOGENIN genes were used to detect the X and Y-chromosomal DNA fragment. Sex determination was not approved in some samples by all three genes amplification together, it means if we used just SRY gene, some samples would be mistakenly considered female and false negative, while evaluation of AMELOGENIN and TSPY genes simultaneously causes the results of the test to become real positive. The choice of SRY and TSPY genes is due to male embryos’ definitive involvement in X-linked diseases. The AMELOGENIN gene was used to detect X, Y chromosomal DNA fragments in spent media. Genetic screening and sex determination using both sex chromosomes (X and Y) are more reliable. However, we could not discriminate between AMELOGEGNIN gene on X and Y chromosomes in real-time PCR results, due to the close melting temperature, but we suggest that this determination should be done on both sex chromosome (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wu, Wang, Chen, Chen and Zhang2017). Three different DNA extraction methods were compared, boiling, ethanol precipitation and phenol-chloroform solution. At first, boiling, which was previously investigated to extract cell-free DNA, was attempted to use (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wu, Wang, Chen, Chen and Zhang2017). According to the results of real-time PCR for sexing, phenol-chloroform solution was a more sensitive, accurate and affordable method among these extraction methods.

Since the sensitivity and accuracy of this method in comparison with CGH array-PGS, as a reliable technique were 100.00%, this method is probably can replace the current invasive PGS. Hence, it seems embryo stage of development, collecting time and optimized DNA extraction method are important factors in spent culture medium-PGS.

Conclusion

Preimplantation non-invasive sexing on culture medium is an alternative approach for the prevention of transmission of sex-linked genetic diseases. However, before its clinical use, further studies with a larger sample size must investigate PGS reliability using spent culture medium.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran, for their cooperation throughout the period of study. This study was financed by Iran University of Medical Sciences (grant no. 32305).

Author contributions

AS.M: acquisition of data, data analysis and drafting the manuscript, S.A: design of study and acquisition of data, M.M: revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, M. B: data analysis, J.SM: acquisition of data, F.N: data analysis, M.B: conception and design and approved final version of article, FS.A: conception and design and approved final version of article.

Funding

This study was financed by Iran University of Medical Sciences (grant no. 32305).

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

All participants signed written informed consent before being enrolled in the study and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1398.341).

Footnotes

These two co-first authors contributed equally to this study.

References

Assou, S., Ait-Ahmed, O., El Messaoudi, S., Thierry, A. R. & Hamamah, S. (2014). Non-invasive pre-implantation genetic diagnosis of X-linked disorders. Medical Hypotheses 83, 506508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capalbo, A., Romanelli, V., Cimadomo, D., Girardi, L., Stoppa, M., Dovere, L., Dell’edera, D., Ubaldi, F. M. & Rienzi, L. (2016). Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management. Journal Of Assisted Reproduction And Genetics 33, 12791286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmaeili, M., Bazrgar, M., Gourabi, H., Ebrahimi, B., Boroujeni, P. B. & Fakhri, M. (2020). Noninvasive sexing of human preimplantation embryos using RT-PCR in the spent culture media: a proof-of-concept study. European Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology And Reproductive Biology 252, 8993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feichtinger, M., Vaccari, E., Carli, L., Wallner, E., Mädel, U., Figl, K., Palini, S. & Feichtinger, W. (2017). Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 34, 583589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galluzzi, L., Palini, S., Stefani, S. D., Andreoni, F., Primiterra, M., Diotallevi, A., Bulletti, C. & Magnani, M. (2015). Extracellular embryo genomic DNA and its potential for genotyping applications. Future Science Oa 1(4), p.FSO62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jobling, M. A., Lo, I. C. C., Turner, D. J., Bowden, G. R., Lee, A. C., Xue, Y., Carvalho-Silva, D., Hurles, M. E., Adams, S. M. & Chang, Y. M. (2007). Structural variation on the short arm of the human Y chromosome: recurrent multigene deletions encompassing amelogenin Y. Human Molecular Genetics 16, 307316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellogg, D. R., Kikuchi, A., Fujii-Nakata, T., Turck, C. W. & Murray, A. W. (1995). members of the NAP/SET family of proteins interact specifically with B-type cyclins. The Journal Of Cell Biology 130, 661673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magli, M. C., Pomante, A., Cafueri, G., Valerio, M., Crippa, A., Ferraretti, A. P., Gianaroli, L. J. (2016). Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic Fertility and Sterility 105, 676683.E5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcreynolds, S., Vanderlinden, L., Stevens, J., Hansen, K., Schoolcraft, W. B. & Katz-Jaffe, M. G. (2011). Lipocalin-1: a potential marker for noninvasive aneuploidy screening. Fertility And Sterility 95, 26312633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsøe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B. & Remohí, J. J. H. R. (2011). The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Human Reproduction 26, 26582671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakahori, Y., Hamano, K., Iwaya, M. & Nakagome, Y. (1991). Sex identification by polymerase chain reaction using X-Y homologous primer. American Journal Of Medical Genetics 39, 472473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palini, S., Galluzzi, L., De Stefani, S., Bianchi, M., Wells, D., Magnani, M. & Bulletti, C. (2013). Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 26, 603610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roffey, P., Eckhoff, C. & Kuhl, J. (2000). A rare mutation in the amelogenin gene and its potential investigative ramifications. Journal Of Forensic Science 45, 10161019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnieders, F., Dörk, T., Arnemann, J., Vogel, T., Werner, M. & Schmidtke, J. (1996). Testis-specific protein, Y-encoded (TSPY) expression in testicular tissues. Human Molecular Genetics 5, 18011807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahid, M., Dhillon, V. S., Khalil, H. S., Haque, S., Batra, S., Husain, S. A. & Looijenga, L. (2010). A SRY-HMG box frame shift mutation inherited from a mosaic father with a mild form of testicular dysgenesis syndrome in turner syndrome patient. BMC Medical Genetics 11, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahine, L. K. & Lathi, R. B.. (2014) Embryo selection with preimplantation chromosomal screening in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Seminars In Reproductive Medicine. New York, USA: Thieme Medical Publishers, 32(2), 093099.Google Scholar
Shamonki, M. I., Jin, H., Haimowitz, Z. & Liu, L. (2016). Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertility And Sterility 106, 13121318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinlechner, M., Berger, B., Niederstätter, H. & Parson, W. (2002). Rare failures in the amelogenin sex test. International Journal Of Legal Medicine 116, 117120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stigliani, S., Anserini, P., Venturini, P. & Scaruffi, P. (2013). Mitochondrial DNA content in embryo culture medium is significantly associated with human embryo fragmentation. Human Reproduction 28, 26522660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, K. M., Mannucci, A., Kimpton, C. P. & Gill, P. (1993). A rapid and quantitative dna sex test: fluorescence-based PCR analysis of XY homologous gene amelogenin. Biotechniques 15, 636-8640-1.Google ScholarPubMed
Thangaraj, K., Reddy, A. & Singh, L. (2002). Is the amelogenin gene reliable for gender identification in forensic casework and prenatal diagnosis? International Journal Of Legal Medicine 116, 121123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, H., Ding, C., Shen, X., Wang, J., Li, R., Cai, B., Xu, Y., Zhong, Y. & Zhou, C. (2015). Medium-based noninvasive preimplantation genetic diagnosis for human α-thalassemias-sea. Medicine 94(12), p.e669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, J., Fang, R., Chen, L., Chen, D., Xiao, J.-P., Yang, W., Wang, H., Song, X., Ma, T. & Bo, S. (2016). Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 113, 1190711912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, L., Lv, Q., Chen, W., Sun, J., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Chen, X. & Zhang, Z. (2017). presence of embryonic DNA in culture medium. Oncotarget 8, 67805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, R. Y., Gan, L. S., Chang, Y. M. & Yap, E. P. (2007). Molecular characterization of a polymorphic 3-Mb deletion at chromosome Yp11. 2 containing the Amely locus in singapore and Malaysia populations. Human Genetics 122, 237249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. The primer sequences (5′-3′) used in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Figure 1

Figure 1. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification SRY gene of whole blood cell of men.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification TSPY gene of whole blood cell of men.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification AMELOGENIN gene of whole blood cell of men.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Melting curve, quantitation and standard curve analysis of Amplification AMELOGENIN gene of endometrial cells of women.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Melting curve and quantitation analysis of amplification SRY gene of culture medium.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Melting curve amplification and quantitation analysis_cycling A. Green of AMELOGENIN XY gene of culture medium.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Melting curve of amplification and quantitation analysis_cycling A. Green of AMELOGENIN XX gene of culture medium.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Melting curve of amplification and quantitation analysis_cycling A. Green of TSPY gene of culture medium.

Figure 9

Table 2. Result of sex determination in all medium samples collected on day 5 comparing with PGD/CGH array results

Figure 10

Figure 9. Comparing PGD/CGH array results to cell-free DNA analysis. Sixty-four spent culture media were collected on day 3. Fifty-six spent culture media were collected on day 5. The results from trophectoderm biopsy and cell-free DNA analysis were compared and classified according to the observed patterns.