Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-s7dlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-22T01:03:38.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-invasive human preimplantation embryos sex determination using STR-based fluorescent multiplex PCR on days 3 and 5 post-fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2025

Maryam Zare ,
Mehdi Totonchi ,
Hamid Gourabi ,
Mohammadreza Zamanian ,
Reza Mohammadi ,
Sirous Zeinali ,
Maryam Mohammadi  and
Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi Open the ORCID record for Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi [Opens in a new window]
Maryam Zare
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences and Advanced Medical Technologies, Royan Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Mehdi Totonchi
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Hamid Gourabi
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Mohammadreza Zamanian
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Reza Mohammadi
Affiliation:
Genetic Laboratory of Shiraz Fertility Center, Shiraz, Iran
Sirous Zeinali
Affiliation:
Dr. Zeinali’s Medical Genetics Laboratory, Kawsar Human Genetics Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Mohammadi
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi*
Affiliation:
Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi. P.O. Box: 16635–148, Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: eftekhari@royaninstitute.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of cell-free DNA (CF-DNA) in the spent cleavage and blastocyst medium versus blastomere biopsy for sex identification using short tandem repeat (STR) markers for the first time. In total, 39 samples of spent culture medium (SCM) from six couples were collected of which 28 samples were CF-DNA from blastocoel fluid + SCM (day 5) and 11 samples from SCM alone (day 3). The frequencies of allele dropout (ADO), fail rate and informativity markers were considered. The relationship between the morphology of embryos and ADO and the fail number of all markers was investigated. Sex identification rate between CF-DNA isolated from culture medium and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was then compared with measurement of Agreement Kappa (AK). The highest frequency of informative markers belonged to DXS6801 and HPRT. There was no relationship between the ADO number of all markers and embryo morphology. A significant difference was seen between embryo morphology and fail numbers. AK value between CF-DNA isolated from culture medium and FISH was 0.516, which is moderate. The ability of CF-DNA to detect the correct diagnosis of males and females showed that all values of specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%. The presence of embryonic CF-DNA in the SCM on day 3 as well as blastocyst medium on day 5 using STR-based multiplex PCR is approximately consistent with FISH for sex identification. Advances in DNA extraction, amplification technique, and testing may allow for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and monogenic/single-gene disorders (PGT-M) as a non-invasive approach without biopsy in the future either in sex determination or chromosomal abnormality.

Keywords

BlastocystCulture mediumMicrosatellite repeatsPreimplantation diagnosisSex determination analysis

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , First View , pp. 1 - 11
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology (2011). Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22(6), 632–646. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.001 Google Scholar
Bahrami Zadegan, S., Dabbagh Bagheri, S., Joudaki, A., Samiee Aref, M. H., Saeidian, A. H., Abiri, M. and Zeinali, S. (2018). Development and implementation of a novel panel consisting 20 markers for the detection of genetic causes of male infertility. Andrologia, 50(4), e12946. doi: 10.1111/and.12946 Google Scholar
Boada, M., Carrera, M., De La Iglesia, C., Sandalinas, M., Barri, P. N. and Veiga, A. (1998). Successful use of a laser for human embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Report of two cases. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 15(5), 302–307. doi: 10.1023/a:1022548612107 Google ScholarPubMed
Breveglieri, G., D’Aversa, E., Finotti, A. and Borgatti, M. (2019). Non-invasive prenatal testing using fetal DNA. Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, 23(2), 291–299. doi: 10.1007/s40291-019-00385-2 Google ScholarPubMed
Brouillet, S., Martinez, G., Coutton, C. and Hamamah, S. (2020). Is cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture medium an alternative to embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing? A systematic review. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 40(6), 779–796. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.002 Google ScholarPubMed
Capalbo, A., Romanelli, V., Patassini, C., Poli, M., Girardi, L., Giancani, A., Stoppa, M., Cimadomo, D., Ubaldi, F. M. and Rienzi, L. (2018). Diagnostic efficacy of blastocoel fluid and spent media as sources of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing in standard clinical conditions. Fertility and Sterility, 110(5), 870–879.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.031 Google Scholar
Chen, D., Fu, Y., Shen, X., Huang, W. and Zhou, C. (2019). 61. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease of spinal muscular atrophy by multiple displacement amplification: 11 unaffected livebirths. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 39 (Supp. 1), e64 Google Scholar
Darwish, E. and Magdi, Y. (2016). Artificial shrinkage of blastocoel using a laser pulse prior to vitrification improves clinical outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(4), 467–471. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0662-z Google ScholarPubMed
Drobnič, K. (2006). A new primer set in a SRY gene for sex identification. International Congress Series, 1288, 268–270. doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.08.020 Google Scholar
ESHRE PGT Consortium Steering Committee, Carvalho, F., Coonen, E., Goossens, V., Kokkali, G., Rubio, C., Meijer-Hoogeveen, M., Moutou, C., Vermeulen, N. and De Rycke, M. (2020) ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the organisation of PGT. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(3), hoaa021. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa021 Google ScholarPubMed
Esteve Codina, A., Niederstätter, H. and Parson, W. (2009). ‘GenderPlex’ a PCR multiplex for reliable gender determination of degraded human DNA samples and complex gender constellations. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 123(6), 459–464. doi: 10.1007/s00414-008-0301-z Google ScholarPubMed
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2017). National DNA Index System (NDIS) operational procedures manual.Google Scholar
Feichtinger, M., Vaccari, E., Carli, L., Wallner, E., Mädel, U., Figl, K., Palini, S. and Feichtinger, W. (2017). Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: A proof-of-concept pilot study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 34(6), 583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.015 Google ScholarPubMed
Gaaib, J. N., Nassief, A. F. et al. (2011). Simple salting-out method for genomic DNA extraction from whole blood. Tikrit, J. (1813–1662). Pure sci. Assi, A, 16, 2.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T. and Schoolcraft, W. B. (2000). Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertility and Sterility, 73(6), 1155–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5 Google ScholarPubMed
Handyside, A. H., Kontogianni, E. H., Hardy, K. and Winston, R. M. (1990). Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature, 344 (6268), 768–770. doi: 10.1038/344768a0 Google ScholarPubMed
Hardy, T. (2020). The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice. Prenatal Diagnosis, 40(6), 647–651. doi: 10.1002/pd.5662 Google ScholarPubMed
Ho, J. R., Arrach, N., Rhodes-Long, K., Ahmady, A., Ingles, S., Chung, K., Bendikson, K. A., Paulson, R. J. and McGinnis, L. K. (2018). Pushing the limits of detection: Investigation of cell-free DNA for aneuploidy screening in embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 110(3), 467–475.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.036 Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, L., Bogale, B., Tang, Y., Lu, S., Xie, X. S. and Racowsky, C. (2019). Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(28), 14105–14112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907472116 Google ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, K., Sahlin, E., Iwarsson, E., Westgren, M., Nordenskjöld, M. and Linnarsson, S. (2015). Amplification-free sequencing of cell-free DNA for prenatal non-invasive diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations. Genomics, 105(3), 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.12.005 Google ScholarPubMed
Kokkali, G., Vrettou, C., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Jones, G. M., Cram, D. S., Stavrou, D., Trounson, A. O., Kanavakis, E. and Pantos, K. (2005). Birth of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocysts for PGD of β-thalassaemia major: Case report. Human Reproduction, 20(7), 1855–1859. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh893 Google Scholar
Li, P., Song, Z., Yao, Y., Huang, T., Mao, R., Huang, J., Ma, Y., Dong, X., Huang, W., Huang, J., Chen, T., Qu, T., Li, L., Zhong, Y. and Gu, J. (2018). Preimplantation genetic screening with spent culture medium/blastocoel fluid for in vitro fertilization. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 9275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27367-4 Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, W., Liu, J., Du, H., Ling, J., Sun, X. and Chen, D. (2017). Non-invasive preimplantation aneuploidy screening and diagnosis of beta thalassemia IVSII654 mutation using spent embryo culture medium. Annals of Medicine, 49(4), 319–328. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1254816 Google ScholarPubMed
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031 Google ScholarPubMed
Munné, S., Cohen, J. and Simpson, J. L. (2007). In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(17), 1769–70; author reply 1770 [Author reply]. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc076314 Google ScholarPubMed
Palini, S., Galluzzi, L., De Stefani, S., Bianchi, M., Wells, D., Magnani, M. and Bulletti, C. (2013). Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 26(6), 603–610. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.012 Google Scholar
Rafi, I., Hill, M., Hayward, J. and Chitty, L. S. (2017). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Use of cell-free fetal DNA in Down syndrome screening. In British Journal of General Practice, 67 (660), 298–299. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691625 Google ScholarPubMed
Reeve, R. and Gottlieb, K. (2020). Sequentially determined measures of interobserver agreement (kappa) in clinical trials may vary independent of changes in observer performance. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 54(3), 681–686. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00102-5 Google ScholarPubMed
Rubio, C., Navarro-Sánchez, L., García-Pascual, C. M., Ocali, O., Cimadomo, D., Venier, W., Barroso, G., Kopcow, L., Bahçeci, M., Kulmann, M. I. R., López, L., De la Fuente, E., Navarro, R., Valbuena, D., Sakkas, D., Rienzi, L. and Simón, C. (2020). Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223(5), e751–e751. e713. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.035 Google ScholarPubMed
Saberzadeh, J., Miri, M., Tabei, M., Dianatpour, M. and Fardaei, M. (2016). Genetic variations of 21 STR markers on chromosomes, 13, 18, 21, X, and Y in the south Iranian population. Genetics and Molecular Research, 15(4), 1–9. doi: 10.4238/gmr15049065 Google Scholar
Schaeffer, E., López-Bayghen, B., Neumann, A., Porchia, L. M., Camacho, R., Garrido, E., Gómez, R., Camargo, F. and López-Bayghen, E. (2017). Whole genome amplification of day 3 or day 5 human embryos biopsies provides a suitable DNA template for PCR-based techniques for genotyping, a complement of preimplantation genetic testing. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1209158. doi: 10.1155/2017/1209158 Google ScholarPubMed
Shamonki, M. I., Jin, H., Haimowitz, Z. and Liu, L. (2016). Proof of concept: Preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertility and Sterility, 106(6), 1312–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1112 Google ScholarPubMed
Shitara, A., Takahashi, K., Goto, M., Takahashi, H., Iwasawa, T., Onodera, Y., Makino, K., Miura, H., Shirasawa, H., Sato, W., Kumazawa, Y. and Terada, Y. (2021). Cell-free DNA in spent culture medium effectively reflects the chromosomal status of embryos following culturing beyond implantation compared to trophectoderm biopsy. PLoS ONE, 16(2), e0246438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246438 Google ScholarPubMed
Steinlechner, M., Berger, B., Niederstätter, H. and Parson, W. (2002). Rare failures in the amelogenin sex test. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 116(2), 117–120. doi: 10.1007/s00414-001-0264-9 Google ScholarPubMed
Timofeeva, A. and Kalinina, E. Drapkina, Yu. S., Chagovets, V. V., Makarova, N. P. and Sukhikh, G. T. (2019). Embryo quality assessment by the small noncoding RNA expression profile in an embryo culture medium in assisted reproductive technology programs. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya [Obstetrics and Gynecology], 6, 79–86. doi: 10.18565/aig.2019.6.79-86 Google Scholar
Tozzo, P., Giuliodori, A., Corato, S., Ponzano, E., Rodriguez, D. and Caenazzo, L. (2013). Deletion of amelogenin Y-locus in forensics: Literature revision and description of a novel method for sex confirmation. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 20(5), 387–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.012 Google ScholarPubMed
Wilton, L., Thornhill, A., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Sermon, K. D. and Harper, J. C. (2009). The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD. Human Reproduction, 24(5), 1221–1228. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den488 Google ScholarPubMed