Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:12:10.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-term storage of the oocytes affects the ploidy status in the yellowtail tetra Astyanax altiparanae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2018

Matheus Pereira dos Santos ,
Nivaldo Ferreira do Nascimento ,
George Shigueki Yasui ,
Nycolas Levy Pereira ,
Takafumi Fujimoto ,
José Augusto Senhorini  and
Laura Satiko Okada Nakaghi
Matheus Pereira dos Santos*
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Nivaldo Ferreira do Nascimento
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
George Shigueki Yasui
Affiliation:
National Center for Research and Conservation of Continental Fish, Chico Mendes Institute of Biodiversity Conservation, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Nycolas Levy Pereira
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Takafumi Fujimoto
Affiliation:
Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan.
José Augusto Senhorini
Affiliation:
National Center for Research and Conservation of Continental Fish, Chico Mendes Institute of Biodiversity Conservation, Pirassununga, Brazil.
Laura Satiko Okada Nakaghi
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Center, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
*
All correspondence to: Aquaculture Center, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil E-mail: matheusps.pereira@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In fish, many factors can affect reproduction during in vitro fertilization, therefore determination of the factors that affect affecting gamete quality is needed. However, few studies have focused on gamete quality and the ploidy status. This study was conducted to elucidate whether oocyte storage can affect ploidy status, survival, and embryo viability in the characid species Astyanax altiparanae. Oocytes were stored in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 26°C, then aliquots were fertilized immediately after extrusion (control) and also after 60, 120, 180, and 240 min of storage. Fertilization and hatching rates were measured, and the developmental stages were analyzed at each stage before describing the main abnormalities. Ploidy status was analyzed by flow cytometry and blood smear. In the control group, 100% of the samples were diploid. After treatment for 60 min, 95.56 ± 4.44% samples were diploid and 4.44 ± 4.44% were triploid. After 120 min, 94.44 ± 9.62% of the samples was diploid and 5.56 ± 5.56% were triploid; 100% of the samples were diploid after 180 min and, after 240 min, there was no survival. In other treatments, the highest percentage of hatching was after 60 min (88.93 ± 5.15%; P = 0.015), and treatment with 180 min storage resulted in the highest percentage of abnormal larvae (95.76 ± 12.67%; P = 0.012). These results show that oocyte storage can affect ploidy status and may be an interesting parameter for analysis in studies on chromosome set manipulation and micromanipulation.

Keywords

EmbryogenesisGametesMorphologyPolyploidyReproduction
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 89 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamov, N.S.M., Nascimento, N.F., Maciel, E.C.S., Pereira-Santos, M., Senhorini, J.A., Calado, L.L. & Yasui, G.S. (2016). Triploid induction in the yellowtail tetra, Astyanax altiparanae, using temperature shock: tools for conservation and aquaculture. J. World Aquacult. Soc.. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12390.Google Scholar
Bertolini, R.M., Senhorini, J.A., Nascimento, N.F., Pereira-Santos, M., Nakaghi, L.S.O., Peres, W.A.M., Silva, R.C. & Yasui, G.S. (2017). First feeding of diploid and triploid yellowtail tetra Astyanax altiparanae: an initial stage for application in laboratory studies. Aquacult. Res. DOI:10.1111/are.13433.Google Scholar
Bobe, J. & Labbé, C. (2010). Egg and sperm quality in fish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 165, 535–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, S., Tyler, C.R. & Sumpter, J.P. (1997). Egg quality in fish: what makes a good egg? Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7, 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauaz, G., Vicente, V.E. & Moreira, O. (1994). Natural triploidy and B-chromosomes in the neotropical fish genus Astyanax (Characidae). Revista Brasileira de Genética 17, 157–63.Google Scholar
Felip, A., Zanuy, S., Carrillo, M. & Piferrer, F. (2001). Induction of triploid and gynogenesis in teleost fish with emphasis on marine species. Genética 111, 175–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Fujimoto, T., Yasui, G.S., Hayakawa, M., Sakao, S., Yamaha, E. & Arai, K. (2010). Reproductive capacity of neo-tetraploid loaches produced using diploid spermatozoa from a natural tetraploid male. Aquaculture (Amsterdam) 308, S133–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantek, D.L.Z., Noleto, R.B., Fenocchio, A.S. & Cestari, M.M. (2007). Cytotaxonomy, heterochromatic polymorphism and natural triploidy of a species of Astyanax (Pisces, Characidae) endemic to the Iguaçu River Basin. Brazilian Archives Biol. Technol. 50, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komen, H. & Thorgaard, G.H. (2007). Androgenesis, gynogenesis and the production of clones in fishes: a review. Aquaculture 269, 150–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, S.N., Neto, M.F., Bakkali, M., Vicari, M.R., Artoni, R.F., Oliveira, C.D. & Foresti, F. (2012). Natural triploidy and B chromosomes in Astyanax scabripinnis (Characiformes, Characidae): a new occurrence. Caryologia 65, 40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maistro, E.L., Lúcia Dias, A., Foresti, F., Oliveira, C. & Filho, O.M. (1994). Natural triploidy in Astyanax scabripinnis (Pisces, Characidae) and simultaneous occurrence of macro B-chromosomes. Caryologia 47 (3–4), 233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelli, S., Bertollo, L.A.C., Foresti, F., Moreira, F.O. & De Almeida Toledo, F.S. (1983). Cytogenetic considerations on the genus Astyanax (Pisces, Characidae). I. Karyotypic variability. Caryologia 36, 235–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascimento, N.F., Pereira-Santos, M., Piva, L.H., Manzini, B., Fujimoto, T., Senhorini, J.A., Yasui, G.S. & Nakaghi, L.S.O. (2017). Growth, fatty acid composition and reproductive parameters of diploid and triploid yellowtail tetra Astyanax altiparanae . Aquaculture 471, 163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, K., Takeda, Y., Unuma, T., Morishima, K., Tanaka, H., Arai, K. & Ohta, H. (2013). Post ovulatory oocyte aging induces spontaneous occurrence of polyploids and mosaics in artificial fertilization of Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. Aquaculture 404–5, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otani, S., Iwai, T., Nakahata, S., Sakai, C. & Yamashita, M. (2009). Artificial fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a teleost fish, the Medaka (Oryzias latipes). Biol. Reprod. 80, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira-Santos, M., Yasui, G.S., Xavier, P.L.P., Adamov, N.S.M., Nascimento, N.F., Fujimoto, T., Senhorini, J.A. & Nakaghi, L.S.O. (2016). Morphology of gametes, post-fertilization events and the effect of temperature on the embryonic development of Astyanax altiparanae (Teleostei, Characidae). Zygote 24, 795–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piferrer, F., Beaumont, A., Falguiere, J.C., Flajshans, M., Haffray, P. & Colombo, L. (2009). Polyploid fish and shellfish: production, biology and applications to aquaculture for performance improvement and genetic containment. Aquaculture 293, 125–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, E., Godinho, H.P. & Sato, Y. (2003). Short-term storage of oocytes from the neotropical teleost fish Prochilodus marggravii . Theriogenology 60, 1059–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, M., Matoso, D.A., Ludwig, A.M., Gomes, E., Almeida, M.C., Vicari, M.R. & Artoni, R.F. (2011). Natural triploidy in Rhamdia quelen identified by cytogenetic monitoring in Iguaçu basin, southern Brazil. Environ. Biol. Fishes 91, 361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y.H., Chen, S.P., Wang, Y.P., Hu, W. & Zhu, Z.Y. (2005). Cytoplasmic impact on cross-genus cloned fish derived from transgenic common carp (Cyprinus carpio) nuclei and goldfish (Carassius auratus) enucleated eggs. Biol. Reprod. 72, 510–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, D., Takahashi, A. & Ueno, K. (2009). Morphometric characteristics and reproductive capacity of nuclear transplants derived from embryonic cells of loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. J. Exp. Zool. 311A, 11–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorgaard, G.H., Sheerer, P.D. & Zhang, J. (1992). Integration of chromosome set manipulation and transgenic technologies for fishes. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1, 251–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Yasui, G.S., Arias-Rodrigues, L., Fujimoto, T. & Arai, K. (2009). A sperm cryopreservation protocol for the loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus and its applicability for other related species. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 116, 335–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasui, G.S., Fujimoto, T., Sakao, S., Yamaha, E. & Arai, K. (2011). Production of loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) germ-line chimera using transplantation of primordial germ cells isolated from cryopreserved blastomeres. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 2380–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasui, G.S., Fujimoto, T., Arias-Rodriguez, l., Takagi, Y. & Arai, K. (2012). The effect of ions and cryoprotectants upon sperm motility and fertilization success in the loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus . Aquaculture (Amsterdam) 344–9, 147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasui, G.S., Senhorini, J.A., Shimoda, E., Pereira-Santos, M., Nakaghi, L.S.O., Fujimoto, T., Arias-Rodrigues, L. & Silva, L.A. (2015). Improvement of gamete quality and its short-term storage: an approach for biotechnology in laboratory fish. Animal 9, 464–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Y., Psenicka, M., Fujimoto, T., Saito, T., Yasui, G.S., Yamaha, E. & Arai, K. (2012). Motility, morphology, mitochondria and ATP content of diploid spermatozoa from sex-reversed clonal diploid and neo-tetraploid loach. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 28, 1006–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar