Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T01:33:50.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robert Clewis on Kant and Aesthetic Normativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

Jessica J. Williams
Jessica J. Williams*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
*
Email: jjwilli7@usf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics, Robert Clewis characterises Kant’s early views of aesthetic normativity in terms of a synthesis of a rationalist appeal to laws of sensibility and an empiricist appeal to rules of taste that are arrived at through consensus about great works of art. On the consensus approach, sharing the experience of beauty with others is itself a source of pleasure and normativity. For Clewis, the mature Kant no longer ties aesthetic normativity to sociality, but instead grounds it in the a priori principle of judgement. In these comments, I challenge Clewis’ narrative about Kant’s development and argue that the mature Kant continues to connect aesthetic normativity to the sociality of taste.

Keywords

aesthetic judgementaesthetic normativitycommon sensebeautyaesthetic communitarianism
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , First View , pp. 1 - 7
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guyer, Paul (1982) ‘Pleasure and society in Kant’s theory of taste’. In Cohen, T. and Guyer, P. (eds.), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 21–54.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997) Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900 -) Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lanford, Michael (2011) ‘Ravel and “The Raven”: The realisation of an inherited aesthetic in “Boléro”’. Cambridge Quarterly, 40, 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2006) ‘Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful’. In Kukla, R. (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 194–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matherne, Samantha (2019) ‘Kant on aesthetic autonomy and common sense’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19, 1–22.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2011) ‘Kant on enlightened moral pedagogy’. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49, 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, Nick (2022) ‘Toward a communitarian theory of aesthetic value’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 80, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jessica J. (2024) ‘Autonomy and community in Kant’s theory of taste’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 82, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar