Book contents
- Reimagining Prosperity
- Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
- Reimagining Prosperity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Imaginaries of Prosperity
- 3 Reimagining Consumption
- 4 Designing Technology
- 5 Reinventing Industrial Policy
- 6 Transforming the Corporation
- 7 Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Select Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2024
Book contents
- Reimagining Prosperity
- Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
- Reimagining Prosperity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Imaginaries of Prosperity
- 3 Reimagining Consumption
- 4 Designing Technology
- 5 Reinventing Industrial Policy
- 6 Transforming the Corporation
- 7 Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reimagining ProsperityToward a New Imaginary of Law and Political Economy in the EU, pp. 215 - 228Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Select Bibliography
Aalbers, Manuel B. ‘The Variegated Financialization of Housing’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41, no. 4 (1 July 2017): 542–54.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Profile Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Frank, and Heinzerling, Lisa. Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing. The New Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Adams, Suzi. Ricoeur and Castoriadis in Discussion: On Human Creation, Historical Novelty, and the Social Imaginary. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.Google Scholar
Aimaer, Karl, and Rodrik, Dani. ‘Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20, no. 2 (6 January 2020): 189–207.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Andre, Thomas J., Jr. ‘Cultural Hegemony: The Exportation of Anglo-Saxon Corporate Governance Ideologies to Germany’. Tulane Law Review 73, no. 1 (1998): 104–16.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P. S. The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augenstein, Daniel. ‘Integration through Law’ Revisited: The Making of the European Polity. Ashgate Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Balanyá, Belén. Europe Inc: Regional and Global Restructuring and the Rise of Corporate Power. Pluto Press (UK), 2000.Google Scholar
Barkhausen, Robin, Durand, Antoine, and Fick, Katharina. ‘Review and Analysis of Ecodesign Directive Implementing Measures: Product Regulations Shifting from Energy Efficiency towards a Circular Economy’. Sustainability 14, no. 16 (19 August 2022): 10318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, John M. ‘Green Republicanism and a “Just Transition” from the Tyranny of Economic Growth’. In Green Politics and Civic Republicanism, edited by Dodsworth, Ashley and Honohan, Iseult, 59–76. Routledge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija. ‘The Affordability of Energy: How Much Protection for the Vulnerable Consumers?’ Journal of Consumer Policy 33, no. 3 (9 February 2010): 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija. ‘Contesting Austerity: On the Limits of EU Knowledge Governance’. Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 1 (3 February 2017): 150–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija. ‘Hayek Upside-Down: On the Democratic Effects of Transnational Lists’. German Law Journal 21, no. 1 (1 January 2020): 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija. ‘Imaginaries of Progress as Constitutional Imaginaries’. In European Constitutional Imaginaries: Between Ideology and Utopia, edited by Komárek, Jan, 360–77. Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Bartl, Marija ‘Internal Market Rationality, Private Law and the Direction of the Union: Resuscitating the Market as the Object of the Political’, European Law Journal 21, no. 5 (15 January 2015), 572–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija ‘Internal Market Rationality: In the Way of Re‐imagining the Future’. European Law Journal 24, no. 1 (1 January 2018): 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija ‘Making Transnational Markets: The Institutional Politics behind the TTIP’. Europe and the World 1, no. 1 (1 June 2017): 1–37.Google Scholar
Bartl, Marija ‘Regulatory Convergence through the Back Door: TTIP’s Regulatory Cooperation and the Future of Precaution in Europe’. German Law Journal 18, no. 4 (1 July 2017): 969–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija ‘Towards the Imaginary of Collective Prosperity in the European Union (EU): Reorienting the Corporation’. European Law Open 1, no. 4 (2022): 957–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartl, Marija ‘The Way We Do Europe: Subsidiarity and the Substantive Democratic Deficit’. European Law Journal 21, no. 1 (1 January 2015): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, Tim. ‘Transnational Corporations and Global Governance’. Annual Review of Sociology 44, no. 1 (30 July 2018): 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Elizabeth Popp. Thinking Like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy. Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul. ‘The Imaginary Constitution of Constitutions’. Social Imaginaries 3, no. 1 (1 January 2017): 167–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Boas, Ingrid, Farbotko, Carol, Adams, Helen, Sterly, Harald, Bush, Simon R., Van Der Geest, Kees, Wiegel, Hanne et al. ‘Climate Migration Myths’. Nature Climate Change 9, no. 12 (2019): 901–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogoeski, Vladimir. ‘The Aftermath of the Laval Quartet: Emancipating Labour (Law) from the Rationality of the Internal Market in the Field of Posting’. PhD diss., Hertie School, Berlin, 2021. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3717.Google Scholar
Bollier, David, and Helfrich, Silke. Free, Fair, and Alive: The Insurgent Power of the Commons. New Society Publishers, 2019.Google Scholar
Bradford, Anu. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruna, Natacha. ‘A Climate-Smart World and the Rise of Green Extractivism’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 49, no. 4 (2022): 839–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruszt, László, and Vukov, Višnja. ‘Making States for the Single Market: European Integration and the Reshaping of Economic States in the Southern and Eastern Peripheries of Europe’. West European Politics 40, no. 4 (2017): 663–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard, Anja Marie, Mosgaard, Mette, and Remmen, Arne. ‘From Energy Efficiency towards Resource Efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive’. Journal of Cleaner Production 144 (1 February 2017): 358–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, Laura. ‘Private Rights of Nature’. Transnational Environmental Law 11, no. 3 (1 November 2022): 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel. ‘Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics’. The Sociological Review 46, no. S1 (1 May 1998): 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, Katherine, Dasgupta, Dipak, Krinner, Gerhard, Mukherji, Aditi, Thorne, Peter, Trisos, Christopher H., Romero, José et al. ‘IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. IPCC (25 July 2023): 1–34.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro, Seccombe, Monica, and Weiler, Joseph. Integration through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience. De Gruyter, 1985.Google Scholar
Caruso, Daniela. ‘Non-parties: The Negative Externalities of Regional Trade Agreements in a Private Law Perspective’. Harvard International Law Journal 59 (2018): 389–430.Google Scholar
Chamorel, Patrick. ‘Macron versus the Yellow Vests’. Journal of Democracy 30, no. 4 (1 January 2019): 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandhoke, Neera. Democracy and Revolutionary Politics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. ‘The Corporate Takeover of U.S. Democracy’. Chomsky.info (24 January 2010). https://chomsky.info/20100124/.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, Emilios. ‘Europe’s Donors and Its Supplicants: Reflections on the Greek Crisis’. In Constitutional Sovereignty and Social Solidarity in Europe, edited by ven der Walt, Johan and Ellsworth, Jeffrey, 241–66. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, Emilios. The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law. Cambridge University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closa, Carlos, Kochenov, Dimitry, and Weiler, Joseph H. H.. ‘Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union’. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, No. 2014/25 (2014).Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., and Keohane, Robert O.. ‘The Liberal Order Is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither’. Foreign Affairs 96, no. 3 (2017): 36–44.Google Scholar
Copeland, Paul, and Daly, Mary E.. ‘The European Semester and EU Social Policy’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56, no. 5 (28 February 2018): 1001–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremaschi, Simone, Rettl, Paula, Cappelluti, Marco, and De Vries, Catherine E.. ‘Geographies of Discontent: Public Service Deprivation and the Rise of the Far Right in Italy’. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 24-024 (1 November 2023).Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. ‘Privatised Keynesianism: An Unacknowledged Policy Regime’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11, no. 3 (1 August 2009): 382–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dani, Marco, Chiti, Edoardo, Mendes, Joana, Menéndez, Agustín José, Schepel, Harm, and Wilkinson, Michael, ‘At the End of the Law: A Moment of Truth for the Eurozone and the EU,’ University of Luxembourg Working Paper (2020). https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/45861/1/Weiss-VB.pdf.Google Scholar
Dari‐Mattiacci, Giuseppe, Gelderblom, Oscar, Jonker, Joost, and Enrico, Perotti. ‘The Emergence of the Corporate Form’. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 33, no. 2 (24 March 2017): 193–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Mark. ‘New Governance and the Displacement of Social Europe: The Case of the European Semester,’ European Constitutional Law Review 14, no. 1 (2018): 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domurath, Irina, and Chantal, Mak. ‘Private Law and Housing Justice in Europe’. The Modern Law Review 83, no. 6 (2020): 1188–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukes, Ruth. The Labour Constitution: The Enduring Idea of Labour Law. Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Kesic, Josip. ‘The Return of the Native: Can Liberalism Safeguard Us against Nativism?’ In Oxford Studies in Culture and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellinas, Antonis A. ’Media and the Radical Right’. In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Rydgren, Jens, 269–84. Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Esposito, Roberto. Politics and Negation: For an Affirmative Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.Google Scholar
European Banking Authority. ‘Final EBA Report on Undue Short-Term Pressures from the Financial Sector’. European Banking Authority (2019) www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document_library/Final%20EBA%20report%20on%20undue%20short-term%20pressures%20from%20the%20financial%20sector%20v2_0.pdf.Google Scholar
European Economists for an Alternative Economic Policy in Europe, ‘EuroMemorandum 2020: A Green New Deal for Europe – Opportunities and Challenges’. Euromemo Group (2019) www.euromemo.eu/euromemorandum/euromemorandum_2020/index.html.Google Scholar
Feichtner, Isabel, Krajewski, Markus, and Roesch, Ricarda, eds. Human Rights in the Extractive Industries: Transparency, Participation, Resistance, vol. 3, Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights. Springer International Publishing, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennis, Bob M., and Stroebe, Wolfgang. The Psychology of Advertising. Psychology Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Valeria. ‘The Platformisation of Digital Payments: The Fabrication of Consumer Interest in the EU FinTech Agenda’. Computer Law & Security Review 45 (1 July 2022): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, , Thiemo. ‘Did Austerity Cause Brexit?’ American Economic Review 109, no. 11 (1 November 2019): 3849–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fici, Antonio. ‘The New Italian Code of the Third Sector. Essence and Principles of a Historic Legislative Reform’. In The Law of Third Sector Organizations in Europe, edited by Fici, Antonio, 115–39. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flamant, Eloi, Godar, Sarah, and Richard, Gaspard. ‘New Forms of Tax Competition in the European Union: An Empirical Investigation’. EU-Tax Observatory (2021).Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy. ‘The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16, no. 3 (1 April 1991): 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. ‘Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no. 3 (16 August 2006): 533–62.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Jaeggi, Rahel. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Polity, 2018.Google Scholar
Frey, Carl Benedikt. The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation. Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Funke, , Manuel, Schularick, Moritz, and Trebesch, Christoph. ‘Going to Extremes: Politics after Financial Crises, 1870–2014’. European Economic Review 88C (1 September 2016): 227–60.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Ricardo Duque, Klein, Mathias, and Pessoa, Ana Sofia. ‘The Political Costs of Austerity’. The Review of Economics and Statistics (27 September 2023): 1–45. https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-abstract/doi/10.1162/rest_a_01373/117705/The-Political-Costs-of-Austerity?redirectedFrom=fulltext.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galofré‐Vilà, Gregori, Meissner, Christopher M., McKee, Martin, and Stuckler, David. ‘Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi Party’. The Journal of Economic History 81, no. 1 (11 January 2021): 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. ‘Common Sense as a Cultural System’. The Antioch Review 33, no. 1 (1 January 1975): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelter, Martin. EU Company Law Harmonization between Convergence and Varieties of Capitalism. ECGI, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghodsee, Kristen R. Everyday Utopia: What 2,000 Years of Wild Experiments Can Teach Us about the Good Life. Simon & Schuster, 2023.Google Scholar
Ging, Debbie. ‘Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere’. Men And Masculinities 22, no. 4 (10 May 2017): 638–57.Google Scholar
Green, Andy. The Crisis for Young People: Generational Inequalities in Education, Work, Housing and Welfare. Springer, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’ European Law Journal 1, no. 3 (1995): 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundmann, Stefan. ‘The Concept of the Private Law Society: After 50 Years of European Business and European Business Law’. European Review of Private Law 16, no. 4 (2008): 553–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guriev, Sergei, and Elias, Papaioannou. ‘The Political Economy of Populism’. Journal of Economic Literature 60, no. 3 (1 September 2022): 753–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics. John Wiley & Sons, 2023.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity Press, 1997Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”’ European Law Journal 1, no. 3 (1 November 1995): 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, Andrew. ‘Whose Recovery?’ Speech at the Bank of England (30 June 2016). www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2016/whose-recovery.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert L. ‘Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State’. Political Science Quarterly 38, no. 3 (1 September 1923): 470–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harremoes, Paul, Gee, David, MacGarvin, Malcom, Stirling, Andy, Keys, Jane, Wynne, Brian, and Vaz, Sofia Guedes. The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings. Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Kris, Van Santen, Ralf, and Kirchherr, Julian. ‘Policies for Transitioning towards a Circular Economy: Expectations from the European Union (EU)’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 155 (1 April 2020): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. ‘The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism’. New Commonwealth Quarterly 5 (1939): 131–49.Google Scholar
Hermann, Christoph, and Verhoest, Koen. ‘Varieties and Variations of Public-Service: Liberalisation and Privatisation in Europe’. PIQUE Policy Paper 1 (2008): 1–12.Google Scholar
Hess, David J., and Sovacool, Benjamin K.. ‘Sociotechnical Matters: Reviewing and Integrating Science and Technology Studies with Energy Social Science’. Energy Research & Social Science 65 (1 July 2020): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselink, Martijn W. ‘Alienation Commodification: A Critique of the Role of EU Consumer Law’. European Law Open 2, no. 2 (1 June 2023): 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselink, Martijn W. ‘Common Frame of Reference & Social Justice’. European Review of Contract Law 4, no. 3 (1 January 2008): 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselink, Martijn W. Justifying Contract in Europe: Political Philosophies of European Contract Law. Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickel, Jason, and Kallis, Giorgos. ‘Is Green Growth Possible?’ New Political Economy 25, no. 4 (2019): 469–86.Google Scholar
Hinteregger, Monika. ‘Civil Liability and the Challenges of Climate Change: A Functional Analysis’. Journal of European Tort Law 8, no. 2 (2 November 2017): 238–60.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Harvard University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hishiyama, Izumi. ‘The Tableau Economique of Quesnay’. Kyoto University Economic Review 30, no. 1 (1960): 1–46.Google Scholar
Hüller, Thorsten, and Kohler‐Koch, Beate. ‘Assessing the Democratic Value of Civil Society Engagement in the European Union’. in EU Governance to Civil Society – Gains and Challenges, edited by Beate Kohler-Koch, Dirk de Bièvre, and William Maloney, CONNEX Report Series 05 (1 January 2008): 145–81.Google Scholar
Ireland, Paddy. ‘Corporate Schizophrenia: The Corporation as a Separate Legal Person and an Object of Property’, University of Bristol Working Paper (2016).Google Scholar
Irion, Kristina, Yakovleva, Svetlana, and Bartl, Marija, ‘Trade and Privacy: Complicated Bedfellows?,’ How to Achieve Data Protection-Proof Free Trade Agreements (13 July 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2877166 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2877166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaakkola, Jussi. ‘Taming the Leviathan or Dismantling Democratic Government? Evolving Political Ideas on Spontaneous Income Tax Integration in the European Union’. European Law Open 2, no. 3 (2023): 575–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabko, Nicolas. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Jackson, Tim. Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. Taylor & Francis, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, Thomas, and Gran, Brian. ‘Political Citizenship: Foundations of Rights’. In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, edited by Isin, Engin F. and Turner, Bryan S., 13–52. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun, Kim. ‘Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea’. Minerva 47, no. 2 (1 June 2009): 119–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Polanyi, Karl. Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets. Hart Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh. Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions. Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, Mény, Yves, Weiler, Joseph, Burgess, Inge, Engert, Chris, and Scharpf, Fritz W.. ’Mountain of Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance’. Jean Monnet Working Papers, Harvard Law School (2001).Google Scholar
Johnson, Simon, and Daron, Acemoglu. Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. Hachette UK, 2023.Google Scholar
José Menéndez, Agustín. ‘The Existential Crisis of the European Union,’ German Law Journal 14, no. 5 (2013): 453–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaupa, Clemens. ‘Has (Downturn-)Austerity Really Been “Constitutionalized” in Europe? On the Ideological Dimension of Such a Claim’. Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 1 (2017): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaupa, Clemens. The Pluralist Character of the European Economic Constitution. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
Kellij, Sara, and Hilhorst, Ester. ‘Negen Op Tien Nederlanders: Sprake van “wooncrisis”’. Ipsos I&O (2 November 2023). www.ioresearch.nl/actueel/negen-op-tien-nederlanders-sprake-van-wooncrisis/.Google Scholar
Kelton, Stephanie. The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and How to Build a Better Economy. Hachette UK, 2020.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’. In The New Law and Economic Development, edited by Alvaro Santos and Trubek, David M., 19–73. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keune, Maarten ‘Not Balanced and Hardly New: The European Commission’s Quest for Flexicurity’. ETUI, The European Trade Union Institute (2007).Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. ‘The End of Laissez-Faire’. In Essays in Persuasion, 272–94. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjaer, Poul F. ‘The Law of Political Economy: An Introduction’. In The Law of Political Economy: Transformation in the Function of Law, 1–30. Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, Christoph, and Tosun, Jale. Public Policy: A New Introduction. Red Globe Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Komárek, Jan. European Constitutional Imaginaries: Between Ideology and Utopia. Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komárek, Jan. ‘European Constitutional Imaginaries: Utopias, Ideologies and the Other,’ SSRN Scholarly Paper (29 October 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. ‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession Essay’. Foreign Affairs 73, no. 2 (1994): 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kukovec, Damjan. ‘Law and the Periphery’. European Law Journal 21, no. 3 (20 November 2015): 406–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Kibum, and Soebin, Jang. ‘There Is No Good War for Talent: A Critical Review of the Literature on Talent Management’. Employee Relations 44, no. 1 (2021): 94–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards A Radical Democratic Politics. Verso Books, 2014.Google Scholar
Leaman, , Jeremy The Bundesbank Myth: Towards a Critique of Central Bank Independence. Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, Päivi. ‘Constitutional Imaginaries of Solidarity: Framing Fiscal Integration Post-NGEU,’ University of Helsinki Working Paper (2023). https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstreams/6c044fbd-a8ee-4bb1-a884-baf52446888a/download;.Google Scholar
Leone, Candida. ‘The Missing Stone in the Cathedral: Of Unfair Terms in Employment Contracts and Coexisting Rationalities in European Contract Law’. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam, 2022. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/48074023/Thesis_complete_.pdf.Google Scholar
Leone, Candida. ‘Transparency Revisited – On the Role of Information in the Recent Case-Law of the CJEU’. European Review of Contract Law 10, no. 2 (1 January 2014): 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, Candida, and Van Duin, Joanna M. L.. ‘The Real (New) Deal: Levelling the Odds for Consumer-Litigants: On the Need for a Modernization, Part II’. European Review of Private Law 27, no. 6 (2019): 1227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesniewska, Feja, and Steenmans, Katrien. Circular Economy and the Law: Bringing Justice into the Frame. Taylor & Francis, 2023.Google Scholar
Liverman, Diana. ‘Who Governs, at What Scale and at What Price? Geography, Environmental Governance, and the Commodification of Nature,’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94, no. 4 (1 December 2004): 734–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofstedt, Ragnar E.. The ‘Plateau-ing’ of the European Better Regulation Agenda: An Analysis of Activities Carried Out by the Barroso Commission 1,’ Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals 10, no. 4 (June 2007):423–447.Google Scholar
Loos, Marco B. M. ‘Full Harmonisation as a Regulatory Concept and Its Consequences for the National Legal Orders. The Example of the Consumer Rights Directive’. Centre for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series, No. 2010/03 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, and Millo, Yuval. ‘Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange’. American Journal of Sociology 109, no. 1 (1 July 2003): 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Chantal. ‘Gutiérrez Naranjo – On Limits in Law and Limits of Law’. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, No. 2017-38 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Chantal. ‘Giving Voice: A Public Sphere Theory of European Private Law Adjudication’. European Law Open 2, no. 4 (2023): 697–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Chantal, and Kas, Betül. Civil Courts and the European Polity: The Constitutional Role of Private Law Adjudication in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Vanessa, and Terryn, Evelyne. ‘Circular Economy and Consumer Protection: The Consumer as a Citizen and the Limits of Empowerment through Consumer Law’. Journal of Consumer Policy 43, no. 1 (2020): 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mańko, Rafał, Škop, Martin, and Štěpáníková, Markéta, ‘Carving Out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?,’ Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 6, no. 2 (1 December 2016): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Markovits, Daniel. The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. Penguin, 2020.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Warren H. ‘A New Pillar of the WTO: Sound Science’. International Lawyer 32, no. 3 (1 January 1998): 651–77.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. ‘The German Ideology’ (1845). In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by Szeman, Imre and Kaposy, Timothy. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana. Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. Penguin UK, 2021.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, 1st ed. Anthem Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Penguin UK, 2019.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana, and Rodrik, Dani. ‘Industrial Policy with Conditionalities: A Taxonomy and Sample Cases’. Working paper WP 2023/07, Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (2023).Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana, and Collington, Rosie. The Big Con: How the Consulting Industry Weakens Our Businesses, Infantilizes Our Governments and Warps Our Economies. Penguin Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Meagher, Michelle. Competition Is Killing Us: How Big Business Is Harming Our Society and Planet – and What to Do About It. Penguin UK, 2020.Google Scholar
Mellink, Bram, Oudenampsen, Merijn, and Woltring, Naomi. Neoliberalisme: Een Nederlandse Geschiedenis. Boom Amsterdam, 2022.Google Scholar
Meuwese, Anne C. M. ‘EU–US Horizontal Regulatory Cooperation: Mutual Recognition of Impact Assessment?’ In Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: The Shifting Roles of the EU, the US and California, edited by Vogel, David and Swinnen, Johan F. M., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Michel, Anaïs. ‘Premature Obsolescence: In Search of an Improved Legal Framework’. PhD diss., KU Leuven, 2022.Google Scholar
Micklitz, Hans-W. ‘A “Certain” Future for the Optional Instrument’. In A European Optional Contract Law: Policy Choices, edited by Jansen, Sanne, 181–94. De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar
Micklitz, Hans-W. ‘The Measuring of the Law through EU Politics’. In The Politics of European Legal Research, 223–38. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.Google Scholar
Micklitz, Hans-W. The Politics of Justice in European Private Law: Social Justice, Access Justice, Societal Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklitz, Hans-W. ‘The Visible Hand of European Regulatory Private Law – The Transformation of European Private Law from Autonomy to Functionalism in Competition and Regulation’. Yearbook of European Law 28, no. 1 (1 January 2009): 3–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklitz, Hans‐W., and Patterson, Dennis. ‘From the Nation State to the Market: The Evolution of EU Private Law’. In The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension, edited by van Vooren, Bart, 59–78. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklitz, Hans‐W., and Reich, Norbert. ‘The Court and Sleeping Beauty: The Revival of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (UCTD)’. Common Market Law Review 51, no. 3 (1 June 2014): 771–808.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Miller, Toby. ‘Michel Foucault, the Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79’. International Journal of Cultural Policy 16, no. 1 (1 February 2010): 56–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Jason W. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. ‘The Myth of Europe’s Democratic Deficit’. Intereconomics 43, no. 6 (2008): 331–40.Google Scholar
Morvillo, Marta, and Weimer, Maria. ‘Who Shapes the CJEU Regulatory Jurisprudence? On the Epistemic Power of Economic Actors and Ways to Counter It’. European Law Open 1, no. 3 (1 September 2022): 510–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time. Penguin Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Niglia, Leone. The Structural Transformation of European Private Law: A Critique of Juridical Hermeneutics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Riordan, Timothy, and Cameron, James. ‘The History and Contemporary Significance of the Precautionary Principle’. In Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, 1–19. Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Fintan. ‘Review of Defying Tribalism, by Susan Neiman’. The New York Review of Books (2 November 2023).Google Scholar
Pacces, Alessio M. ‘Civil Liability in the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Proposal: A Law & Economics Analysis,’ European Corporate Governance Institute – Law Working Paper, No. 691 (2023).Google Scholar
Pargendler, Mariana. ‘The Corporate Governance Obsession’. Journal of Corporation Law 42 (2016): 359–402.Google Scholar
Pelkmans, Jacques. ‘The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization’. Journal of Common Market Studies 25, no. 3 (1987): 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst‐Ulrich. ‘Neoliberalism, Ordoliberalism and the Future of Economic Governance’. Journal of International Economic Law 26, no. 4 (December 2023): 836–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianta, Mario. ‘An Industrial Policy for Europe’. Seoul Journal of Economics 27 (2014): 277–305.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pistor, Katharina. The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Polverini, Davide. ‘Regulating the Circular Economy within the Ecodesign Directive: Progress so Far, Methodological Challenges and Outlook’. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27 (1 July 2021): 1113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponticelli, Jacopo, and Hans-Joachim, Voth. ‘Austerity and Anarchy: Budget Cuts and Social Unrest in Europe, 1919–2008’. Journal of Comparative Economics 48, no. 1 (2020): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Přibáň, Jiří. Constitutional Imaginaries: A Theory of European Societal Constitutionalism. Routledge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. The Upswing: How America Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can Do It Again. Simon & Schuster, 2020.Google Scholar
Rau, Thomas, and Oberhuber, Sabine. Material Matters: Developing Business for a Circular Economy. Taylor & Francis, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raworth, Kate. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a Twenty-first-Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Read, Rupert, and O’Riordan, Tim. ‘The Precautionary Principle under Fire’. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 59, no. 5 (18 August 2017): 4–15.Google Scholar
Reich, Norbert, and Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang. ‘Crónica de una muerte anunciada: The Commission Proposal for a “Directive on Consumer Rights”’. Common Market Law Review 46 (2009): 471–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robé, Jean-Philippe. Property, Power and Politics: Why We Need to Rethink the World Power System. Policy Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Anat. ‘Exaggeration: Advertising, Law and Medical Quackery in Britain, c. 1840–1914’. The Journal of Legal History 42, no. 2 (4 May 2021): 202–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosset, Jan, Giger, Nathalie, and Bernauer, Julian. ‘More Money, Fewer Problems? Cross-Level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation’. West European Politics 36, no. 4 (1 July 2013): 817–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, David R. Our Tribal Future: How to Channel Our Foundational Human Instincts into a Force for Good. St. Martin’s Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? Allen Lane, 2020.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. ‘Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy’. MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 11, 2011, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. ‘The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a “Social Market Economy”’. Socio-Economic Review 8, no. 2 (24 December 2010), 211–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepel, Harm. ‘The Bank, the Bond, and the Bail-Out: On the Legal Construction of Market Discipline in the Eurozone’. Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 1 (1 March 2017): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Christoph U. ‘The Instrumentalist Conception of the Acquis Communautaire in Consumer Law and Its Implications on a European Contract Law Code,’ European Review of Contract Law 1, no. 2 (July 2005): 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A., and Mark, Thatcher. ‘Why Are Neoliberal Ideas so Resilient in Europe’s Political Economy?’ Critical Policy Studies 8, no. 3 (3 July 2014): 340–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. ‘Neo-Neofunctionalism’. In European Integration Theory, 1st ed., edited by Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas, 46–74. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schularick, Moritz. ‘Public and Private Debt: The Historical Record (1870–2010)’. German Economic Review 15, no. 1 (1 February 2014): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Kate Alexander. Baby Boomers versus Millennials: Rhetorical Conflicts and Interest. Shefffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI) (2018).Google Scholar
Siems, Mathias M. ‘Shareholder Protection around the World (‘Leximetric II’)’. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper, No. 359 (December 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Margarida. ‘The European Union’s Revolving Door Problem’. In Lobbying in the European Union, edited by Dialer, Doris and Richter, Margarethe, 273–89. Springer, 2019Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, Beate. ‘Redefining the Corporation for a Sustainable New Economy’. Journal of Law and Society 45, no. 1 (2018): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjåfjell, Beate, Johnston, Andrew, Anker-Sørensen, Linn, and Millon, David K.. ‘Shareholder Primacy: The Main Barrier to Sustainable Companies’. In Company Law and Sustainability, edited by Sjåfjell, Beate and Richardson, Benjamin J., 79–147. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodian, Quinn. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Şorman, Alevgül H. ‘Deceitful Decoupling: Misconceptions of a Persistent Myth’. In Studies in Ecological Economics, edited by Kerry Turner, R., Costanza, Robert, and Farley, Joshua, 165–77. Springer, 2023.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, and McAdams, Stephen. ‘News, Politics, and Negativity’. Political Communication 32, no. 1 (2 January 2015): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, Amia. The Right to Sex: Feminism in the Twenty-First Century in the United States. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021 .Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. ‘Government Failure vs. Market Failure: Principles of Regulation’. In Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, edited by Balleisen, Edward J. and Moss, David A., 13–51. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. ‘The Crises of Democratic Capitalism’. New Left Review, no. 71 (January 1, 2011): 5–29.Google Scholar
Sum, Ngai-Ling, and Jessop, Bob. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory’. In Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, edited by Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inge-Johanne, and Teubner, Gunther, 3–28. Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law & Society Review 17, no. 2 (1 January 1983): 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. Pantheon, 1975.Google Scholar
Tørsløv, Thomas, Wier, Ludvig, and Zucman, Gabriel. ‘The Missing Profits of Nations’. The Review of Economic Studies 90, no. 3 (2023): 1499–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentmann, Frank. Empire of Things: How We Became a World of Consumers, from the Fifteenth Century to the Twenty-First. Penguin UK, 2016.Google Scholar
Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. ‘Transnational Class Agency and European Governance: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists’. New Political Economy 5, no. 2 (1 July 2000): 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dam, P. ‘The Entangled Consumer: Rethinking the Rise of the Consumer after 1945’. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 33, no. 2 (2021): 212–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoek, Aukje A. H. ‘Re-Embedding the Transnational Employment Relationship: A Tale about the Limitations of (EU) Law?,’ Common Market Law Review 55, no. 2 (2018): 449–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, Ingo. ‘Possibilities of the Past: Histories of the NIEO and the Travails of Critique,’ Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire Du Droit International 20, no. 3 (2018): 263–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Jefim, Guérin, Gauthier, O’Neill, Daniel W., and Steinberger, J.. ‘Safeguarding Livelihoods against Reductions in Economic Output’. Ecological Economics 215 (1 January 2024): 107977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vukov, Visnja. ‘Growth Models in Europe’s Eastern and Southern Peripheries: Between National and EU Politics’. New Political Economy 28, no. 5 (3 September 2023): 832–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Wendy. ‘Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture’. Duke Law Journal 59, no. 7 (1 January 2010): 1321–1432.Google Scholar
Weatherill, Stephen. ‘Competence Creep and Competence Control’. Yearbook of European Law 23, no. 1 (1 January 2004): 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 2. University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Wettstein, Florian. ‘The History of Business and Human Rights and Its Relationship with Corporate Social Responsibility’. In Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business, edited by Deva, Surya and Birchall, David, 23–45. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Senator Sheldon. Captured: The Corporate Infiltration of American Democracy. The New Press, 2019.Google Scholar
World Bank. Doing Business – an Independent Evaluation: Taking the Measure of the World Bank-IFC Doing Business Indicators. World Bank Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Young, J. Michael. ‘Kant’s View of Imagination’. Kant-Studien 79, nos. 1–4 (1 January 1988): 140–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan, and Bart, Vanhercke. ‘Socializing the European Semester: EU Social and Economic Policy Co-ordination in Crisis and Beyond’. Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 2 (2018): 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access